"Let There Be Light in
The Firmament"
Jesus Said,
"There Shall Be Sign's in the Sun,
and In the Moon and in the Stars"
http://www.thefirmament.org/
Tuesday, March 31, 2009
Proof of The Creator - The Firmament
And God Said,
"Let There Be Light in
The Firmament"
Jesus Said,
"There Shall Be Sign's in the Sun,
and In the Moon and in the Stars"
http://www.thefirmament.org/
"Let There Be Light in
The Firmament"
Jesus Said,
"There Shall Be Sign's in the Sun,
and In the Moon and in the Stars"
http://www.thefirmament.org/
Monday, March 30, 2009
Critics call WTC tower name change Unpatriotic
Well Guys, You can't call it "Freedom Tower"
when the 1st Occupants to Be there are a Communist China Real estate Agency.
Now that Would make Hillary Rottingham Clinton Appear to be Anti-American? ~Lisa~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I'm passing this article from the associated press on to you all. I must say that, I to, find it very strange that they are changing the name at this juncture. I have a feeling about this, one that I can't exactly pin point. I don't know; however, past experiences have shown me that significant clues and tell tale signs can be found in the things we may tend to blow off and or count as insignificant. Just a little "Old Lady" wisdom....for whatever it's worth.
Baroness Machiavelli
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Critics call WTC tower name change unpatriotic
By AMY WESTFELDT
NEW YORK (AP) — Even without the name, the symbolism of the Freedom Tower as an American response to the Sept. 11 terror attacks was hard to miss.
The original architect designed a twisting form he wanted to imitate the Statue of Liberty, with a spire that rose to the deliberate height of 1,776 feet to recognize the year of American independence. Politicians called the tower proof of the country's triumph over terrorism.
Former Gov. George Pataki said visitors to the iconic skyscraper "will know our determination to overcome evil" in a 2003 speech that first gave the Freedom Tower its name.
The tower — still under construction with a projected completion date of 2013 — no longer has the same architect, design or footprint on the 16-acre site. And this week, the owners of ground zero publicly parted ways with the Freedom Tower name, saying it would be more practical to market the tallest building in New York as the former north tower's name, One World Trade Center.
Critics called the name drop an unpatriotic shedding of symbolism by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. Some newspaper editorials blasted the agency for years of missed deadlines and changing plans for the site.
"When you've broken your promises on everything else to do with redeveloping ground zero, it's no big deal to discard the name by which the public has come to know the iconic skyscraper at the heart of the plan," the New York Daily News wrote on Friday.
But others privately repeated fears that have plagued the building as negotiations with major corporations to take up space in the tower came and went: that the 102-story Freedom Tower's name could make it more susceptible to future attacks than a symbol of defiance against it.
"The fact is, more than 3 billion dollars of public money is invested in that building and, as a public agency, we have the responsibility to make sure it is completed and that we utilize the best strategy to make certain it is fully occupied," the agency said in a statement Friday.
Agency chairman Anthony Coscia was more critical in remarks Thursday, when the Port Authority announced its first corporate lease at the tower with a Chinese business center.
"As we market the building, we will ensure the building is presented in the best possible way," he said. One World Trade Center is "easiest for people to identify with, and frankly, we've gotten a very interested and warm reception to it."
Coscia had expressed concerns about the Freedom Tower three years earlier, saying he would never ask Port Authority employees to move into the tallest, most symbolic skyscraper being built at the site because they had survived 1993 and 2001 terrorist attacks and would find it too emotionally difficult to return.
Several other government offices were located in the original trade center, and the Port Authority is trying to finalize leases with the federal and state governments that would lease half the building. No other corporate tenants have signed on. The Port Authority has agreed to lease space in another tower being built at the site.
Pataki — who named the Freedom Tower in his 2003 speech and continued to refer to it in rebuilding speeches as a symbol of America's ability to come back after Sept. 11, took offense at the loss of the Freedom Tower moniker and its replacement.
"Where One and Two World Trade Center once stood, there will be a memorial with two voids to honor the heroes we lost. In my view, those addresses should never be used again," he said.
The Daily News and New York Post published editorials backing the former governor. But The New York Times on Saturday wrote that Pataki's name for the building became "its burden," and said the Port Authority was "quietly and sensibly" using another name to market the tower to high-profile commercial tenants.
The Port Authority suggested that people could still call the building the Freedom Tower; the name has stuck despite the fact that the agency quietly stopped it on first reference years ago. The agency made One World Trade Center the building's legal name when it took over its construction in 2006, although it also acquired the trademark for the Freedom Tower name.
Mayor Michael Bloomberg — who said Friday he prefers the name Freedom Tower — said the building's true name may be left to the public.
"One of the things is we call things what we want to call them. So Avenue of Americas is a good example. It's Sixth Avenue to most people," the mayor said. "If they name this One World Trade Center, people will still call it the Freedom Tower."
when the 1st Occupants to Be there are a Communist China Real estate Agency.
Now that Would make Hillary Rottingham Clinton Appear to be Anti-American? ~Lisa~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I'm passing this article from the associated press on to you all. I must say that, I to, find it very strange that they are changing the name at this juncture. I have a feeling about this, one that I can't exactly pin point. I don't know; however, past experiences have shown me that significant clues and tell tale signs can be found in the things we may tend to blow off and or count as insignificant. Just a little "Old Lady" wisdom....for whatever it's worth.
Baroness Machiavelli
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Critics call WTC tower name change unpatriotic
By AMY WESTFELDT
NEW YORK (AP) — Even without the name, the symbolism of the Freedom Tower as an American response to the Sept. 11 terror attacks was hard to miss.
The original architect designed a twisting form he wanted to imitate the Statue of Liberty, with a spire that rose to the deliberate height of 1,776 feet to recognize the year of American independence. Politicians called the tower proof of the country's triumph over terrorism.
Former Gov. George Pataki said visitors to the iconic skyscraper "will know our determination to overcome evil" in a 2003 speech that first gave the Freedom Tower its name.
The tower — still under construction with a projected completion date of 2013 — no longer has the same architect, design or footprint on the 16-acre site. And this week, the owners of ground zero publicly parted ways with the Freedom Tower name, saying it would be more practical to market the tallest building in New York as the former north tower's name, One World Trade Center.
Critics called the name drop an unpatriotic shedding of symbolism by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. Some newspaper editorials blasted the agency for years of missed deadlines and changing plans for the site.
"When you've broken your promises on everything else to do with redeveloping ground zero, it's no big deal to discard the name by which the public has come to know the iconic skyscraper at the heart of the plan," the New York Daily News wrote on Friday.
But others privately repeated fears that have plagued the building as negotiations with major corporations to take up space in the tower came and went: that the 102-story Freedom Tower's name could make it more susceptible to future attacks than a symbol of defiance against it.
"The fact is, more than 3 billion dollars of public money is invested in that building and, as a public agency, we have the responsibility to make sure it is completed and that we utilize the best strategy to make certain it is fully occupied," the agency said in a statement Friday.
Agency chairman Anthony Coscia was more critical in remarks Thursday, when the Port Authority announced its first corporate lease at the tower with a Chinese business center.
"As we market the building, we will ensure the building is presented in the best possible way," he said. One World Trade Center is "easiest for people to identify with, and frankly, we've gotten a very interested and warm reception to it."
Coscia had expressed concerns about the Freedom Tower three years earlier, saying he would never ask Port Authority employees to move into the tallest, most symbolic skyscraper being built at the site because they had survived 1993 and 2001 terrorist attacks and would find it too emotionally difficult to return.
Several other government offices were located in the original trade center, and the Port Authority is trying to finalize leases with the federal and state governments that would lease half the building. No other corporate tenants have signed on. The Port Authority has agreed to lease space in another tower being built at the site.
Pataki — who named the Freedom Tower in his 2003 speech and continued to refer to it in rebuilding speeches as a symbol of America's ability to come back after Sept. 11, took offense at the loss of the Freedom Tower moniker and its replacement.
"Where One and Two World Trade Center once stood, there will be a memorial with two voids to honor the heroes we lost. In my view, those addresses should never be used again," he said.
The Daily News and New York Post published editorials backing the former governor. But The New York Times on Saturday wrote that Pataki's name for the building became "its burden," and said the Port Authority was "quietly and sensibly" using another name to market the tower to high-profile commercial tenants.
The Port Authority suggested that people could still call the building the Freedom Tower; the name has stuck despite the fact that the agency quietly stopped it on first reference years ago. The agency made One World Trade Center the building's legal name when it took over its construction in 2006, although it also acquired the trademark for the Freedom Tower name.
Mayor Michael Bloomberg — who said Friday he prefers the name Freedom Tower — said the building's true name may be left to the public.
"One of the things is we call things what we want to call them. So Avenue of Americas is a good example. It's Sixth Avenue to most people," the mayor said. "If they name this One World Trade Center, people will still call it the Freedom Tower."
Sunday, March 29, 2009
A Wow Moment! Unborn Baby Grabs a Surgeons Finger
A picture began circulating in November. It should be 'The Picture of the Year,' or perhaps, 'Picture of the Decade..' The picture is that of a 21-week-old unborn baby named Samuel Alexander Armas, who is being operated on by surgeon named Joseph Bruner.
The baby was diagnosed with spina bifida and would not survive if removed from his mother's womb. Little Samuel's mother, Julie Armas, is an obstetrics nurse in Atlanta. She knew of Dr. Bruner's remarkable surgical procedure.Practicing at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, he performs these special operations while the baby is still in the womb.
During the procedure, the doctor removes the uterus via C-section and makes a small incision to operate on the baby. As Dr. Bruner completed the surgery on Samuel, the little guy reached his tiny, but fully developed hand through the incision and firmly grasped the surgeon's finger. Dr. Bruner was reported as saying that when his finger was grasped, it was the most emotional moment of his life, and that for an instant during the procedure he was just frozen, totally immobile.
The photograph captures this amazing event with perfect clarity. The editors titled the picture, 'Hand of Hope.' The text explaining the picture begins, 'The tiny hand of 21-week-old fetus Samuel Alexander Armas emerges from the mother's uterus to grasp the finger of Dr. Joseph Bruner as if thanking the doctor for the gift of life.
Little Samuel's mother said they 'wept for days' when they saw the picture. She said, 'The photo reminds us pregnancy isn't about disability or an illness, it's about a little person.'Samuel was born in perfect health, the operation 100 percent successful.
Now see the actual picture, and it is awesome.........incredible.......and hey, pass it onThe world needs to see this one!
Don't tell me our God isn't an awesome God!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Wow! that is Beautiful. And in His Mothers Womb makes Him a Person...
The Moral of the Story is... Stop Killing Babies... You Evil Morons! ~Lisa~
Thursday, March 26, 2009
No we are not "All In This Together" by Cindy Sheehan
No we are not, that's the point.
By Cindy Sheehan
March 25, 2009 "ICH" -- President Obama basically said that we can't demonize every investor who earns a profit, because "we are all in this together." Sorry, but I am going to have to call a big fat "bull-shit" on this one.
When Obama said "we" did he have a mouse in his pocket? Obama, and his family have a very opulent, slave-built roof over their heads. He travels on the public nickel, his children attend an exclusive Washington, DC private school that has organic food on its menu, and has health care that covers everyone in his family from head to toe and side to side and inside out.
Even though he and every member of the administration, Congress and the Supreme Court are not hurting for anything, the bastard (sorry if your parents weren't married when you were conceived) Wall Street banksters are receiving billions of dollars of government welfare and are not so good about being in "this together" with us.
The only concrete steps the Treasury and Fed have taken are to buy "toxic" assets (if something is toxic can it still be an asset?) so companies like Goldman Sachs (via AIG) can have the public tit rescue them from their stupider than crap mistakes.
WE the ROBBED Class are in this together. THEY the ROBBER Class are in it for themselves. How many times does Obama have to demonstrate that his economic recovery is nothing but Reaganomics wrapped in a little bit of populist rhetoric to make it easier for the mis-informed Robbed Class to swallow. If anything transpires to alleviate the suffering in our Class at all, it will be because some of the prosperity got through the cracks in the deeply cancerous system and trickled ON us. Rest assured, this is just a mistake and the only time the Robber Class cares about us, is when the interests of the two classes collide.
I will feel like I am "in this" with the Obamas when I have a free house, free health care and if my children would not have to go into lifelong debt to pay for university.
I wonder if the wall to wall homeless population (it's growing at an alarming rate) here in San Francisco feels "in this together" with the Wall Street Robbers?
I wonder if the people standing waiting for hours in municipal Emergency Rooms waiting to get some, any medical attention feel "in this together" with Congress which has 110% medical coverage?
I wonder if the foot soldiers for the Empire feel "in this together" with the War Profiteer Robbers?
I wonder if the victims of the drug wars and street wars feel "in this together" with the children of the Robbers who ride to their schools in limos with bodyguards?
I wonder if our brothers and sisters living in tent cities with their children feel "in this together" with the Pelosis and Feinsteins of the world who live in their obscenely huge mansions in exclusive neighborhoods and fly back and forth from DC in private jets that suck down gas at an immoral rate?
I wonder if our brothers and sisters who just cashed a final unemployment check feels "in this together" with the Robbers who just cashed millions in bonuses?
I, myself, feel "in this together" with the homeless, hungry, sick, jobless, struggling, stressed, frightened, confused, yet resilient, brave and strong.
WE are in this together. WE need to step outside of the Robber Class system and start to build our own systems to help each other through this Robber Class/Goldman Sachs/Federal Reserve depression.
http://informationclearinghouse.info/article22296.htm
By Cindy Sheehan
March 25, 2009 "ICH" -- President Obama basically said that we can't demonize every investor who earns a profit, because "we are all in this together." Sorry, but I am going to have to call a big fat "bull-shit" on this one.
When Obama said "we" did he have a mouse in his pocket? Obama, and his family have a very opulent, slave-built roof over their heads. He travels on the public nickel, his children attend an exclusive Washington, DC private school that has organic food on its menu, and has health care that covers everyone in his family from head to toe and side to side and inside out.
Even though he and every member of the administration, Congress and the Supreme Court are not hurting for anything, the bastard (sorry if your parents weren't married when you were conceived) Wall Street banksters are receiving billions of dollars of government welfare and are not so good about being in "this together" with us.
The only concrete steps the Treasury and Fed have taken are to buy "toxic" assets (if something is toxic can it still be an asset?) so companies like Goldman Sachs (via AIG) can have the public tit rescue them from their stupider than crap mistakes.
WE the ROBBED Class are in this together. THEY the ROBBER Class are in it for themselves. How many times does Obama have to demonstrate that his economic recovery is nothing but Reaganomics wrapped in a little bit of populist rhetoric to make it easier for the mis-informed Robbed Class to swallow. If anything transpires to alleviate the suffering in our Class at all, it will be because some of the prosperity got through the cracks in the deeply cancerous system and trickled ON us. Rest assured, this is just a mistake and the only time the Robber Class cares about us, is when the interests of the two classes collide.
I will feel like I am "in this" with the Obamas when I have a free house, free health care and if my children would not have to go into lifelong debt to pay for university.
I wonder if the wall to wall homeless population (it's growing at an alarming rate) here in San Francisco feels "in this together" with the Wall Street Robbers?
I wonder if the people standing waiting for hours in municipal Emergency Rooms waiting to get some, any medical attention feel "in this together" with Congress which has 110% medical coverage?
I wonder if the foot soldiers for the Empire feel "in this together" with the War Profiteer Robbers?
I wonder if the victims of the drug wars and street wars feel "in this together" with the children of the Robbers who ride to their schools in limos with bodyguards?
I wonder if our brothers and sisters living in tent cities with their children feel "in this together" with the Pelosis and Feinsteins of the world who live in their obscenely huge mansions in exclusive neighborhoods and fly back and forth from DC in private jets that suck down gas at an immoral rate?
I wonder if our brothers and sisters who just cashed a final unemployment check feels "in this together" with the Robbers who just cashed millions in bonuses?
I, myself, feel "in this together" with the homeless, hungry, sick, jobless, struggling, stressed, frightened, confused, yet resilient, brave and strong.
WE are in this together. WE need to step outside of the Robber Class system and start to build our own systems to help each other through this Robber Class/Goldman Sachs/Federal Reserve depression.
http://informationclearinghouse.info/article22296.htm
NEW CANNIBALS HAVE TAKEN CONTROL OF OUR MEDICAL INDUSTRY
Subtitle: As predicted in New Age circles in 1987, American doctors and medical professionals have reached the point in practice of Satanism that they have become the new cannibals! Cannibalization is now HUGE business.
NEWS BRIEF: "Selling Body Parts Is Big Business: But nowhere in the country are grieving families told that the cadavers they donate fuel a fast-growing industry predicted to hit $1 billion within three years", by Mark Katches, William Heisel, and Ronald Campbell, The Orange County Register, reported in The Providence Sunday Journal, April 16, 2000, p. A-1, 24.
"American businesses make hundreds of millions of dollars selling products crafted from donated human bodies, even though it is illegal to profit from cadaver parts, an Orange County Register investigation found. Cadaver skin puffs up the lips of fashion models at $1,050 a shot. Dentists use ground bone about 200,000 times a year to treat their patients. Glossy catalogs advertise 650 products made from body parts."
"A single dead body yields raw materials worth tens of thousands of dollars to businesses whose stock is traded on Wall Street and to nonprofit agencies that obtain the parts for them ... Nowhere in the country are grieving families told that their gifts fuel a fast-growing industry predicted to hit $1 billion within three years. Neither are millions of people who indicate on their driver's licenses their willingness to donate body parts."
Twice in the past two paragraphs, we have seen use of the words, "body parts ". This effort to harvest human body parts so they can be put into another body fulfills one of the two major definitions of "Cannibalize". The dictionary defines cannibalize as: "To remove serviceable parts for use in the repair of other equipment". Thus, by this definition alone, these modern doctors harvesting organs are involved in cannibalization.
" 'People who donate have no idea that tissue is being processed into products that, per gram or per ounce, are in the price range of diamonds' ... The products enhance millions of lives, according to industry trade groups. Cadaver tendons help athletes return to the playing field. Slings crafted from human skin solve bladder troubles. Corneas prepared for implant allow the blind to see. About 20,000 dead Americans became part of this manufacturing cycle last year, four times the number of bodies used for vital-organ transplants."
"Organs can only be harvested from donors who are brain dead but whose heart and other organs are still functioning ... The tissue trade now generates about $500 million dollar annually. 'There is a profit', said Michael Jeffries, chief financial officer for Osteotech, Inc., a leader in the bone business. 'It's not an evil thing because the profit is put to good use." [p. A-1, 22; Emphasis added]
Did I just hear Karl Marx speaking? Marx said "The end justifies the means". In Communism, the perceived end is considered so very "good" that the most unspeakable -- and numerous -- crimes against humanity have been perpetrated by Communists trying to change the society for the 'better', which meant putting hundreds of millions of people to death, enslaving tens of millions more in gulags, and enslaving the entire population indefinitely.
Further, as I read this "defense" of the satanic practice of "harvesting" body parts for organ donation by this Michael Jeffries, I remembered a verse from the Old Testament that fits perfectly. "Such is the way of an adulterous woman; she eateth, and wipeth her mouth, and saith, 'I have done no wickedness'." [Proverbs 30:20]
Truly, this entire wicked industry commits sin against God and His commands far more grievous than adultery; and then her participants wipe their mouths, uttering the vile excuse, "I have done no wickedness".
This sorry state of affairs is simply one of the last steps in the dreary road mankind has steadily marched from the throne of Darwinism. Evolution teaches that man is not created, but has evolved; Evolution teaches that no loving Creator made man in His own image; Evolution teaches that man is simply, and only, another animal, an advanced one to be sure, but still just an animal. Evolution teaches that man possesses no eternal soul, bound either for eternal Heaven or Hell; some evolutionists teach we are only like animals who possess no soul, while others teach the lie of Reincarnation, i.e., "You shall surely not die".
Thus, evolutionists shake their heads in wonder as to why anyone should get upset by the killing of babies within the womb, since we are just animals. Evolutionists similarly shake their heads in wonder that anyone could possibly object to the selling of human body parts since such activity accomplishes the twin goals of "making lives better" while making a whole lot of money.
Still, the pragmatists amongst the Evolutionists do understand that a lot of people today have not yet been "freed" from the bondage of Judeo-Christian morality; therefore, they understand the need to mislead most of the people today. Let us return to our article with this concept in mind.
"Families are led to believe they are giving the gift of life. They are not told that skin goes to enlarge penises or smooth out wrinkles, or that executives of tissue banks ... routinely earn six-figure salaries. The products are rarely life-saving, as advertised".
I hope this last sentence goes a long way to convince people not be to taken in by slick advertising designed to appeal to the emotional side of people hurting over the fresh loss of a loved one, particularly when the loss was unexpected. We need to understand the degree to which we are being manipulated, and resist. Our current President, Bill Clinton, is especially adept at crafting his goals and those of his programs, in such emotionally laden language that people are touched to the inner part of their being. He has no interest in 'feeling your pain'; he is just callously trying to manipulate you so he can get the program passed in which he has great interest.
"After interviewing hundreds of people and reviewing thousands of pages of documents, the newspaper found that donated bodies follow one of two paths. They become further research subjects or raw materials for medical products that are sold commercially for profit. It is more likely that body parts will be made into products ... A typical donor produces $14,000 to $34,000 in sales ... But yields can be far greater. Skins, tendons, and corneas are listed at about $110,000. Add bone from the same body, and one cadaver can be worth about $220,000."
I can only shake my head in wonder at the satanic end to which our society has arrived. Then, another Biblical doctrine hit me like a ton of bricks. "The heart is deceitful above all things, and it is exceedingly perverse and corrupt and severely, mortally sick! Who can know it [perceive, understand, be acquainted with his own heart and mind?" [Jeremiah 17:9; Amplified Bible Commentary] During seminars one and two, I teach the truth that the goal of the Bush/Clinton team in propelling the world into the planned New World Order is identical to the goal Adolf Hitler had as he preached his New World Order. The only difference is that Bush/Clinton have learned to hide behind a cleverly-constructed mask of normalcy, while Hitler was far more bold in showing himself for the German Wolf he always was.
And, here our society stands, at the precipice of the next human holocaust, blindly pursuing the greed of monetary profits in this most macabre marketing of human body parts.
This train of thought then produced the next revelation: The Apostle Paul was absolutely correct when he stated, "The love of money is the root of all evil". [1 Timothy 6:10]
Let us continue with our story so we can see the amount of demand for body parts currently in our nation. "The two largest for-profit companies in the tissue industry recorded a combined $142.3 million in sales last year, and each pays its chief executives more than $460,000 annually ... The nation's four largest nonprofit tissue banks say they will generate a total of $261 million in sales this year. And prices are rising. Patients pay $2,400 for a cornea at San Francisco's Pacific Eye Associates. The same eye center charged $1,000 four years ago. Osteotech's trademark bone putty, used in spinal surgery, sells for $853 for 2 teaspoons -- about $100 more than in 1999... Costs can vary by hundreds or thousands of dollars. An Achilles tendon at a Seattle bank sells for $865. Georgia's CryoLife ... charges $2,000 for the same product."
Whenever you get that kind of differential in costs for the same product, you can know a couple of facts to be absolutely true: 1). The cost being charged is based upon "what the market will bear", and not upon actual cost of obtaining finished product. The people running the Seattle tissue operation believed they could only get $853 for a tendon, while the folk at CryoLife believe they can get $2,000. 2). Margins are huge, so huge the final retail price is set without worrying particularly about the actual cost. People managing the Seattle tissue firm are just as pleased with their margins at the lower price as are the people of CryoLife. In this situation, the actual costs for obtaining body parts is extremely low, since the "raw material" is freely donated.
This situation is another instance of the double-dealing of the Federal Government. "Strict Federal laws ban any buying or selling of hearts, lungs, livers or other organs needed for transplant. But the government has helped boost profits in the tissue trade. The Clinton administration adopted rules in 1998 requiring hospitals to notify organ agencies of all deaths. That makes it more likely that families will hear from a tissue bank within four hours of a loved-one's death. The rules are designed to increase the number of organ transplants ... The government is trying new methods to increase organ and tissue donations. Last fall, Vice President Al Gore announced $5 million in grants to organ and tissue donations." So much for the Government passing a law "banning " something!
As terrible as this situation is in America today, it is highly predictable. Christian leaders have been warning that America is heading toward this kind of moral quicksand for decades now. We have warned that a decline in the Biblical high view of man toward the lower view of man as simply another animal makes the next Holocaust inevitable. You see, when people believe they are just animals, then the law of the jungle takes over, and the struggle becomes one of the "survival of the fittest". Inevitably, a dominant group begins to believe they are superior to other groups, and since they possess dominate economic and/or military power, they can begin to plan to eliminate those other "inferior" groups.
In Nazi Germany, "superior" Aryans began to plan to eliminate the "inferior" groups of Jews, Christians, the homeless, the insane, the mentally unstable, the retarded, the elderly, the unwanted babies, and just about anybody they deemed to be different. Even Gypsies were targeted for extinction. At the end of the war, people whose noses were different were sent to the death camps, since the Nazi myth that Jews had a peculiar type of nose ran rampant through Germany.
The New World Order has the same list of groups targeted for removal, with the exception that they are planning to come after the Christian first, and then the Jew. We have already begun the holocaust against the unborn, the partially-born, the elderly, the mentally ill, and the retarded. A former Holocaust survivor, Dr. Wolf Wolfensberger, has sounded the alarm over the past three decades. He estimates that America is killing far more of these "devalued people" per year than did the Nazis from 1938-1945! Dr. Wolfensberger further warns that, if you have a loved one who falls into one of these 'devalued' categories, you had better station a family member by the bed side of that loved one, or they have a very good chance of never walking out of the hospital!
We have sounded Dr. Wolfensberger's warnings in many articles, which we list below:
NEWS1006 -- Six Step Attitudinal Change Plan -- Euthanasia Explored
NEWS1022 -- Movie 'Mortal Fear' Promotes Adult Euthanasia
NEWS1055 -- Review of Six Step Attitudinal Change Plan And How It Is Being Used Today
NEWS1058 -- Death In The Netherlands: Study of Euthanasia In Action, Parallel With Nazism
NEWS1060 -- Army of God
NEWS1061 -- Cloning Will Quickly Become Heart and Soul of the Coming New World Order
In 1987, Omni Magazine was -- and still is -- one of the most important official media publications for the New World Order Agenda. Owned by Playboy Enterprises, Omni ran articles that were shocking "leading edge" concepts that the satanic New World Order crowd wanted adopted eventually. The initial Omni article would serve as the initial impetus toward convincing the American people to accept this radical concept utilizing the Six Step Attitudinal Change Plan. We are going to reprint relevant portions of this article. We can only ask you to remember that many people to whom I showed this article were so shocked at its contents, they vehemently denied that American society could ever, ever accept these values; yet, here we are busily implementing most of them.
"Last Right", Omni Magazine , September, 1987, by Michael Henricott, p. 59+.
This article begins with Michael, the author, watching a team of surgeons busily "harvesting" the organs of a still-living 42-year-old man who had been so severely injured by an aneurysm he had been declared "Brain Dead", thus stripping him of all his normal rights to live. Michael was quite taken by the scene in front of him.
"On his back, eyes shut, breathing rhythmically, R.H. six three, 170 pounds, is a handsome man. Yet even as one admires the strong lines of his body, surgeons with scalpels incise the skin and muscle of his chest and abdomen with long, sure strokes. Using a small electric saw, they cleave the sternum as easily as if it were made of balsa. There is surprisingly little blood, but there's a certain amount of dismay in the operating room (O.R.) when as many as eight doctors have their hands and arms inside the cadaver, working quickly to disconnect the organs from their many vessels."
Once the doctors were finished with their "harvesting", they quietly left the room, and the last guy out switched off both the lights and the respirator. No one seemed to care that they had just deliberately killed a human being for the sole purpose of harvesting his organs for profit. In fact, Michael commented on their cold, business-like demeanor.
After recording this scene of "Organ Harvesting", Michael then proceeded to take the reader through the labyrinth of philosophical reasoning that would allow this type of behavior to be readily accepted by the general public. After an "expert" debunked the Biblical definition of death as heart stoppage, Michael then began to examine the new definitions of death that ranged from "Brain Death" to "Lack of Awareness", a term suspiciously close to the Nazi definition of "death" as a lack of a "Quality of Life". In this discussion, Michael used many terms deliberately chosen because they remove the element of the human, a technique used craftily by the Nazis in the early years of their Holocaust. Some of the terms Michael use are:
* A late-twentieth-century corpse, one of a new class of dead people
* 'Beating heart cadavers' or neo-morts
* "Biologically tenacious' -- quoting Former Surgeon General C. Everett Koop
* Persistent Vegetative State -- people in comas that do not fit the Brain Death scenario, but who certainly have no "Quality of Life".
* Brain dead
* 100,000 Americans 'living' in this kind of 'black hole of the soul'.
* "The 'moment of death' is fiction" . This was the beginning of the next section of Michael's article. After determining that the new definition of death was "Brain Death", or "Lack of Awareness", Michael then boldly turned to the bright "New Frontier" of New Age Medicine, the wholesale selling of human body parts. Listen to him discuss this newest money-making venture.
"I found that the future, as they say, is already with us. After discussing definitions of Brain Death and Persistent Vegetative State, Michael approached the newest satanic concept a little gingerly. He called this concept of death "Cognitive death": A number of bioethicists, philosophers, and M.D.'s are beginning to contemplate expanding the definition of death to include people in persistent vegetative states, individuals who have lost their intellect, memory, speech, and awareness of self or environment." Of course, the huge loop-hole opening for wholesale murder in Cognitive Death is that it is so subjective, rather than being objective as is the Biblical definition. Anyone in authority can decide what the current definition of "Cognitive Death" is; of course, such a malleable definition allows those in authority to progressively change their definition as they see fit.
Thus, the time might come here -- as it has in Communist countries all these many years -- where people who simply disagree with those in authority could be declared "Cognitively Dead" and subsequently executed, probably for the sake of their organs! Christians are a real target here, because New Age writings have already referred to us as being "dead" to the New Age, and therefore, unworthy to partake of it. Furthermore, our healthy lifestyle makes our organs really attractive to the satanic doctors of this new profession. Perhaps, in the 7-year Tribulation Period, many Christians might be martyred by being harvested for their organs.
As Michael was discussing his newest concept of "bioethics", he used a term that, at the time, greatly shocked me. He said it was highly possible that "human vegetable farms " might be set up for the express purpose of providing needed organs. These "human vegetable farms" would be comprised of the "biologically tenacious" people who had been declared "dead", but who refused to actually die! Listen:
"In the movie, Coma, a female anesthesia 'accident' victim is declared dead, they pack her off to the nefarious Jefferson Institute where her body will be maintained artificially until her parts can be harvested and sold ... Many physicians foresee the massive proliferation of 'Jefferson Institutes' devoted to harvesting organs, from the vegetative 'dead'. There is no end to possible scenarios. Female vegetatives, for example, might be employed as surrogate wombs -- providing that endocrine balances could be reestablished after the disruptions that often accompany profound brain damage. The vegetatives could even be mated to produce fertilized eggs or offspring."
Now the "dirty little secret" of New Age planners is out of the bag; now, you know they plan to set up such "Human Vegetable Farms" for many satanic purposes. According to this paragraph, Jefferson Institutes will be set up for the following purposes:
1. Devoted to harvesting organs
2. Surrogate wombs to produce more bodies to be grown expressly for organ harvesting. As we speak, biologists are working with geneticists to produce human bodies without heads, so they can be grown for organ harvesting! This goal is unbelievably satanic, but real.
3. Fertilized eggs or even offspring. Not only could the children born be used for organ donation, but these women in vegetative state could be used to produce the "superior Aryan race" that the New World Order contemplates. Can you see the specter of Adolf Hitler behind all of this?
Michael then returns to the concept of being able to just declare a person "Cognitively Dead". Listen and weep:
"I believe that the meaning of life is cognition and self-awareness , not merely visceral survival", states Fred Plum, neurologist in chief at Cornell University Medical College -- "over the next 20 years, the overwhelming demand for organs may increase the pressure to simply declare the 'brain absent' dead. There is already something of a black market for buying and selling organs. If the cognitive-death definition were instituted, organ-merchandising corporations might establish enterprises beyond Wall Street's wildest insider fantasies. The world would find itself in a situation where death itself would be an industry -- an economic incentive and this economic pressure is not necessarily bad. " [I again think of Proverbs 30:20, "Such is the way of an adulterous woman; she eateth, and wipeth her mouth, and saith, I have done no wickedness."; emphasis added]
Believe me, this is exactly the direction in which this country is heading, as this newspaper article at the beginning of our article, clearly demonstrates. Behind the current explosion of organ harvesting lies this hidden agenda to "build death itself into an industry -- an economic incentive". Further, believe me when I declare that the spiritual Satanism behind this entire effort will reach a point where they will declare that anyone who cannot accept the claims of their New Age Christ [Antichrist] is already dead!
WHERE THIS DEATH INDUSTRY -- ECONOMIC INCENTIVE -- IS REALLY LEADING US
As I began to read the last page of this shocking article, I was further shocked beyond all belief or reason. After speaking in normal tones of the most unbelievable subject of harvesting human beings for organs, Michael took a turn that nearly caused me to drop the magazine in horror! Suddenly, Michael was speaking, not of harvesting human organs, but of eating human flesh! Listen:
"... were it not for the viral infection in the tissue, eating brains would have "provided a good source of protein for a meat-starved community ... the "neocannibalism" of modern medicine ... With the great advances in life-support technology and organ transplantation, the dead today do indeed have much 'protein' to offer us -- in the form of their organs and body parts. We are the neo-cannibals."
This unbelievable quote came from Dr. Carelton Gajdusek, a Nobel prize-winning virologist. I was totally stunned; how could a discussion of harvesting human organs suddenly turn into a discussion of eating human flesh? What an unexpected turn of events! How can this be?
Suddenly, I remembered the problems that the other New World Order advocate experienced during his Holocaust -- Adolf Hitler. Once the new automated killing machines and ovens were set into place in late 1942, precisely half-way through the 7-year Holocaust period, the Nazis were able to kill many more people than they ever dreamed of killing before. However, Nazi engineers suddenly came face-to-face with an unexpected problem: the new, automated "showers" were killing far more people than the ovens could cremate. Bodies began to stack up outside, awaiting cremation. These bodies suddenly presented a health hazard that could not be ignored. Hitler's death camps were threatened with a shut-down unless the engineers could find a solution.
Nazi engineers dug a series of huge trenches, at the bottom of which they placed extremely large natural gas pipes into which had been drilled many holes. When the gas escaping from these holes was ignited, a fiery furnace of almost unbelievable intensity was created. Bodies tossed into this kind of incinerator were consumed before they hit bottom. The problem was ingeniously solved; Hitler's Holocaust continued at a new and much higher, pace. The total number of people killed by Hitler totaled 20 million, including 6 million Jews.
While this number is impressive, Antichrist will kill even more. New Age plans call for a reduction of human population of two-thirds, or 4 billion people. Hitler's problem of body disposal will become even more pronounced when the New World Order Holocaust gets under way, lead by Antichrist.
Can it be that the solution arrived at by New World Order planners is the eating of human flesh, along the order of that old 1950's movie, "Solient Green"? In that movie, human flesh was converted into tasty morsels resembling potato chips. These chips were tasty, and people loved them. As much as you would like to think such a scenario would be impossible to contemplate, I believe this is the reason this Omni article on human organ harvesting took such an unbelievable turn at the end toward cannibalism, the eating of human flesh.
Truly, then, mankind would have become, in the words of the Nobel prize-winning virologist, Carelton Gajdusek, the "neo-cannibals".
Such unbelievable news straight out of the pit of Hell, tells us clearly that we are at the precipice of the New World Order, the Kingdom of Antichrist.
http://www.cuttingedge.org/News/n1364.cfm
NEWS BRIEF: "Selling Body Parts Is Big Business: But nowhere in the country are grieving families told that the cadavers they donate fuel a fast-growing industry predicted to hit $1 billion within three years", by Mark Katches, William Heisel, and Ronald Campbell, The Orange County Register, reported in The Providence Sunday Journal, April 16, 2000, p. A-1, 24.
"American businesses make hundreds of millions of dollars selling products crafted from donated human bodies, even though it is illegal to profit from cadaver parts, an Orange County Register investigation found. Cadaver skin puffs up the lips of fashion models at $1,050 a shot. Dentists use ground bone about 200,000 times a year to treat their patients. Glossy catalogs advertise 650 products made from body parts."
"A single dead body yields raw materials worth tens of thousands of dollars to businesses whose stock is traded on Wall Street and to nonprofit agencies that obtain the parts for them ... Nowhere in the country are grieving families told that their gifts fuel a fast-growing industry predicted to hit $1 billion within three years. Neither are millions of people who indicate on their driver's licenses their willingness to donate body parts."
Twice in the past two paragraphs, we have seen use of the words, "body parts ". This effort to harvest human body parts so they can be put into another body fulfills one of the two major definitions of "Cannibalize". The dictionary defines cannibalize as: "To remove serviceable parts for use in the repair of other equipment". Thus, by this definition alone, these modern doctors harvesting organs are involved in cannibalization.
" 'People who donate have no idea that tissue is being processed into products that, per gram or per ounce, are in the price range of diamonds' ... The products enhance millions of lives, according to industry trade groups. Cadaver tendons help athletes return to the playing field. Slings crafted from human skin solve bladder troubles. Corneas prepared for implant allow the blind to see. About 20,000 dead Americans became part of this manufacturing cycle last year, four times the number of bodies used for vital-organ transplants."
"Organs can only be harvested from donors who are brain dead but whose heart and other organs are still functioning ... The tissue trade now generates about $500 million dollar annually. 'There is a profit', said Michael Jeffries, chief financial officer for Osteotech, Inc., a leader in the bone business. 'It's not an evil thing because the profit is put to good use." [p. A-1, 22; Emphasis added]
Did I just hear Karl Marx speaking? Marx said "The end justifies the means". In Communism, the perceived end is considered so very "good" that the most unspeakable -- and numerous -- crimes against humanity have been perpetrated by Communists trying to change the society for the 'better', which meant putting hundreds of millions of people to death, enslaving tens of millions more in gulags, and enslaving the entire population indefinitely.
Further, as I read this "defense" of the satanic practice of "harvesting" body parts for organ donation by this Michael Jeffries, I remembered a verse from the Old Testament that fits perfectly. "Such is the way of an adulterous woman; she eateth, and wipeth her mouth, and saith, 'I have done no wickedness'." [Proverbs 30:20]
Truly, this entire wicked industry commits sin against God and His commands far more grievous than adultery; and then her participants wipe their mouths, uttering the vile excuse, "I have done no wickedness".
This sorry state of affairs is simply one of the last steps in the dreary road mankind has steadily marched from the throne of Darwinism. Evolution teaches that man is not created, but has evolved; Evolution teaches that no loving Creator made man in His own image; Evolution teaches that man is simply, and only, another animal, an advanced one to be sure, but still just an animal. Evolution teaches that man possesses no eternal soul, bound either for eternal Heaven or Hell; some evolutionists teach we are only like animals who possess no soul, while others teach the lie of Reincarnation, i.e., "You shall surely not die".
Thus, evolutionists shake their heads in wonder as to why anyone should get upset by the killing of babies within the womb, since we are just animals. Evolutionists similarly shake their heads in wonder that anyone could possibly object to the selling of human body parts since such activity accomplishes the twin goals of "making lives better" while making a whole lot of money.
Still, the pragmatists amongst the Evolutionists do understand that a lot of people today have not yet been "freed" from the bondage of Judeo-Christian morality; therefore, they understand the need to mislead most of the people today. Let us return to our article with this concept in mind.
"Families are led to believe they are giving the gift of life. They are not told that skin goes to enlarge penises or smooth out wrinkles, or that executives of tissue banks ... routinely earn six-figure salaries. The products are rarely life-saving, as advertised".
I hope this last sentence goes a long way to convince people not be to taken in by slick advertising designed to appeal to the emotional side of people hurting over the fresh loss of a loved one, particularly when the loss was unexpected. We need to understand the degree to which we are being manipulated, and resist. Our current President, Bill Clinton, is especially adept at crafting his goals and those of his programs, in such emotionally laden language that people are touched to the inner part of their being. He has no interest in 'feeling your pain'; he is just callously trying to manipulate you so he can get the program passed in which he has great interest.
"After interviewing hundreds of people and reviewing thousands of pages of documents, the newspaper found that donated bodies follow one of two paths. They become further research subjects or raw materials for medical products that are sold commercially for profit. It is more likely that body parts will be made into products ... A typical donor produces $14,000 to $34,000 in sales ... But yields can be far greater. Skins, tendons, and corneas are listed at about $110,000. Add bone from the same body, and one cadaver can be worth about $220,000."
I can only shake my head in wonder at the satanic end to which our society has arrived. Then, another Biblical doctrine hit me like a ton of bricks. "The heart is deceitful above all things, and it is exceedingly perverse and corrupt and severely, mortally sick! Who can know it [perceive, understand, be acquainted with his own heart and mind?" [Jeremiah 17:9; Amplified Bible Commentary] During seminars one and two, I teach the truth that the goal of the Bush/Clinton team in propelling the world into the planned New World Order is identical to the goal Adolf Hitler had as he preached his New World Order. The only difference is that Bush/Clinton have learned to hide behind a cleverly-constructed mask of normalcy, while Hitler was far more bold in showing himself for the German Wolf he always was.
And, here our society stands, at the precipice of the next human holocaust, blindly pursuing the greed of monetary profits in this most macabre marketing of human body parts.
This train of thought then produced the next revelation: The Apostle Paul was absolutely correct when he stated, "The love of money is the root of all evil". [1 Timothy 6:10]
Let us continue with our story so we can see the amount of demand for body parts currently in our nation. "The two largest for-profit companies in the tissue industry recorded a combined $142.3 million in sales last year, and each pays its chief executives more than $460,000 annually ... The nation's four largest nonprofit tissue banks say they will generate a total of $261 million in sales this year. And prices are rising. Patients pay $2,400 for a cornea at San Francisco's Pacific Eye Associates. The same eye center charged $1,000 four years ago. Osteotech's trademark bone putty, used in spinal surgery, sells for $853 for 2 teaspoons -- about $100 more than in 1999... Costs can vary by hundreds or thousands of dollars. An Achilles tendon at a Seattle bank sells for $865. Georgia's CryoLife ... charges $2,000 for the same product."
Whenever you get that kind of differential in costs for the same product, you can know a couple of facts to be absolutely true: 1). The cost being charged is based upon "what the market will bear", and not upon actual cost of obtaining finished product. The people running the Seattle tissue operation believed they could only get $853 for a tendon, while the folk at CryoLife believe they can get $2,000. 2). Margins are huge, so huge the final retail price is set without worrying particularly about the actual cost. People managing the Seattle tissue firm are just as pleased with their margins at the lower price as are the people of CryoLife. In this situation, the actual costs for obtaining body parts is extremely low, since the "raw material" is freely donated.
This situation is another instance of the double-dealing of the Federal Government. "Strict Federal laws ban any buying or selling of hearts, lungs, livers or other organs needed for transplant. But the government has helped boost profits in the tissue trade. The Clinton administration adopted rules in 1998 requiring hospitals to notify organ agencies of all deaths. That makes it more likely that families will hear from a tissue bank within four hours of a loved-one's death. The rules are designed to increase the number of organ transplants ... The government is trying new methods to increase organ and tissue donations. Last fall, Vice President Al Gore announced $5 million in grants to organ and tissue donations." So much for the Government passing a law "banning " something!
As terrible as this situation is in America today, it is highly predictable. Christian leaders have been warning that America is heading toward this kind of moral quicksand for decades now. We have warned that a decline in the Biblical high view of man toward the lower view of man as simply another animal makes the next Holocaust inevitable. You see, when people believe they are just animals, then the law of the jungle takes over, and the struggle becomes one of the "survival of the fittest". Inevitably, a dominant group begins to believe they are superior to other groups, and since they possess dominate economic and/or military power, they can begin to plan to eliminate those other "inferior" groups.
In Nazi Germany, "superior" Aryans began to plan to eliminate the "inferior" groups of Jews, Christians, the homeless, the insane, the mentally unstable, the retarded, the elderly, the unwanted babies, and just about anybody they deemed to be different. Even Gypsies were targeted for extinction. At the end of the war, people whose noses were different were sent to the death camps, since the Nazi myth that Jews had a peculiar type of nose ran rampant through Germany.
The New World Order has the same list of groups targeted for removal, with the exception that they are planning to come after the Christian first, and then the Jew. We have already begun the holocaust against the unborn, the partially-born, the elderly, the mentally ill, and the retarded. A former Holocaust survivor, Dr. Wolf Wolfensberger, has sounded the alarm over the past three decades. He estimates that America is killing far more of these "devalued people" per year than did the Nazis from 1938-1945! Dr. Wolfensberger further warns that, if you have a loved one who falls into one of these 'devalued' categories, you had better station a family member by the bed side of that loved one, or they have a very good chance of never walking out of the hospital!
We have sounded Dr. Wolfensberger's warnings in many articles, which we list below:
NEWS1006 -- Six Step Attitudinal Change Plan -- Euthanasia Explored
NEWS1022 -- Movie 'Mortal Fear' Promotes Adult Euthanasia
NEWS1055 -- Review of Six Step Attitudinal Change Plan And How It Is Being Used Today
NEWS1058 -- Death In The Netherlands: Study of Euthanasia In Action, Parallel With Nazism
NEWS1060 -- Army of God
NEWS1061 -- Cloning Will Quickly Become Heart and Soul of the Coming New World Order
In 1987, Omni Magazine was -- and still is -- one of the most important official media publications for the New World Order Agenda. Owned by Playboy Enterprises, Omni ran articles that were shocking "leading edge" concepts that the satanic New World Order crowd wanted adopted eventually. The initial Omni article would serve as the initial impetus toward convincing the American people to accept this radical concept utilizing the Six Step Attitudinal Change Plan. We are going to reprint relevant portions of this article. We can only ask you to remember that many people to whom I showed this article were so shocked at its contents, they vehemently denied that American society could ever, ever accept these values; yet, here we are busily implementing most of them.
"Last Right", Omni Magazine , September, 1987, by Michael Henricott, p. 59+.
This article begins with Michael, the author, watching a team of surgeons busily "harvesting" the organs of a still-living 42-year-old man who had been so severely injured by an aneurysm he had been declared "Brain Dead", thus stripping him of all his normal rights to live. Michael was quite taken by the scene in front of him.
"On his back, eyes shut, breathing rhythmically, R.H. six three, 170 pounds, is a handsome man. Yet even as one admires the strong lines of his body, surgeons with scalpels incise the skin and muscle of his chest and abdomen with long, sure strokes. Using a small electric saw, they cleave the sternum as easily as if it were made of balsa. There is surprisingly little blood, but there's a certain amount of dismay in the operating room (O.R.) when as many as eight doctors have their hands and arms inside the cadaver, working quickly to disconnect the organs from their many vessels."
Once the doctors were finished with their "harvesting", they quietly left the room, and the last guy out switched off both the lights and the respirator. No one seemed to care that they had just deliberately killed a human being for the sole purpose of harvesting his organs for profit. In fact, Michael commented on their cold, business-like demeanor.
After recording this scene of "Organ Harvesting", Michael then proceeded to take the reader through the labyrinth of philosophical reasoning that would allow this type of behavior to be readily accepted by the general public. After an "expert" debunked the Biblical definition of death as heart stoppage, Michael then began to examine the new definitions of death that ranged from "Brain Death" to "Lack of Awareness", a term suspiciously close to the Nazi definition of "death" as a lack of a "Quality of Life". In this discussion, Michael used many terms deliberately chosen because they remove the element of the human, a technique used craftily by the Nazis in the early years of their Holocaust. Some of the terms Michael use are:
* A late-twentieth-century corpse, one of a new class of dead people
* 'Beating heart cadavers' or neo-morts
* "Biologically tenacious' -- quoting Former Surgeon General C. Everett Koop
* Persistent Vegetative State -- people in comas that do not fit the Brain Death scenario, but who certainly have no "Quality of Life".
* Brain dead
* 100,000 Americans 'living' in this kind of 'black hole of the soul'.
* "The 'moment of death' is fiction" . This was the beginning of the next section of Michael's article. After determining that the new definition of death was "Brain Death", or "Lack of Awareness", Michael then boldly turned to the bright "New Frontier" of New Age Medicine, the wholesale selling of human body parts. Listen to him discuss this newest money-making venture.
"I found that the future, as they say, is already with us. After discussing definitions of Brain Death and Persistent Vegetative State, Michael approached the newest satanic concept a little gingerly. He called this concept of death "Cognitive death": A number of bioethicists, philosophers, and M.D.'s are beginning to contemplate expanding the definition of death to include people in persistent vegetative states, individuals who have lost their intellect, memory, speech, and awareness of self or environment." Of course, the huge loop-hole opening for wholesale murder in Cognitive Death is that it is so subjective, rather than being objective as is the Biblical definition. Anyone in authority can decide what the current definition of "Cognitive Death" is; of course, such a malleable definition allows those in authority to progressively change their definition as they see fit.
Thus, the time might come here -- as it has in Communist countries all these many years -- where people who simply disagree with those in authority could be declared "Cognitively Dead" and subsequently executed, probably for the sake of their organs! Christians are a real target here, because New Age writings have already referred to us as being "dead" to the New Age, and therefore, unworthy to partake of it. Furthermore, our healthy lifestyle makes our organs really attractive to the satanic doctors of this new profession. Perhaps, in the 7-year Tribulation Period, many Christians might be martyred by being harvested for their organs.
As Michael was discussing his newest concept of "bioethics", he used a term that, at the time, greatly shocked me. He said it was highly possible that "human vegetable farms " might be set up for the express purpose of providing needed organs. These "human vegetable farms" would be comprised of the "biologically tenacious" people who had been declared "dead", but who refused to actually die! Listen:
"In the movie, Coma, a female anesthesia 'accident' victim is declared dead, they pack her off to the nefarious Jefferson Institute where her body will be maintained artificially until her parts can be harvested and sold ... Many physicians foresee the massive proliferation of 'Jefferson Institutes' devoted to harvesting organs, from the vegetative 'dead'. There is no end to possible scenarios. Female vegetatives, for example, might be employed as surrogate wombs -- providing that endocrine balances could be reestablished after the disruptions that often accompany profound brain damage. The vegetatives could even be mated to produce fertilized eggs or offspring."
Now the "dirty little secret" of New Age planners is out of the bag; now, you know they plan to set up such "Human Vegetable Farms" for many satanic purposes. According to this paragraph, Jefferson Institutes will be set up for the following purposes:
1. Devoted to harvesting organs
2. Surrogate wombs to produce more bodies to be grown expressly for organ harvesting. As we speak, biologists are working with geneticists to produce human bodies without heads, so they can be grown for organ harvesting! This goal is unbelievably satanic, but real.
3. Fertilized eggs or even offspring. Not only could the children born be used for organ donation, but these women in vegetative state could be used to produce the "superior Aryan race" that the New World Order contemplates. Can you see the specter of Adolf Hitler behind all of this?
Michael then returns to the concept of being able to just declare a person "Cognitively Dead". Listen and weep:
"I believe that the meaning of life is cognition and self-awareness , not merely visceral survival", states Fred Plum, neurologist in chief at Cornell University Medical College -- "over the next 20 years, the overwhelming demand for organs may increase the pressure to simply declare the 'brain absent' dead. There is already something of a black market for buying and selling organs. If the cognitive-death definition were instituted, organ-merchandising corporations might establish enterprises beyond Wall Street's wildest insider fantasies. The world would find itself in a situation where death itself would be an industry -- an economic incentive and this economic pressure is not necessarily bad. " [I again think of Proverbs 30:20, "Such is the way of an adulterous woman; she eateth, and wipeth her mouth, and saith, I have done no wickedness."; emphasis added]
Believe me, this is exactly the direction in which this country is heading, as this newspaper article at the beginning of our article, clearly demonstrates. Behind the current explosion of organ harvesting lies this hidden agenda to "build death itself into an industry -- an economic incentive". Further, believe me when I declare that the spiritual Satanism behind this entire effort will reach a point where they will declare that anyone who cannot accept the claims of their New Age Christ [Antichrist] is already dead!
WHERE THIS DEATH INDUSTRY -- ECONOMIC INCENTIVE -- IS REALLY LEADING US
As I began to read the last page of this shocking article, I was further shocked beyond all belief or reason. After speaking in normal tones of the most unbelievable subject of harvesting human beings for organs, Michael took a turn that nearly caused me to drop the magazine in horror! Suddenly, Michael was speaking, not of harvesting human organs, but of eating human flesh! Listen:
"... were it not for the viral infection in the tissue, eating brains would have "provided a good source of protein for a meat-starved community ... the "neocannibalism" of modern medicine ... With the great advances in life-support technology and organ transplantation, the dead today do indeed have much 'protein' to offer us -- in the form of their organs and body parts. We are the neo-cannibals."
This unbelievable quote came from Dr. Carelton Gajdusek, a Nobel prize-winning virologist. I was totally stunned; how could a discussion of harvesting human organs suddenly turn into a discussion of eating human flesh? What an unexpected turn of events! How can this be?
Suddenly, I remembered the problems that the other New World Order advocate experienced during his Holocaust -- Adolf Hitler. Once the new automated killing machines and ovens were set into place in late 1942, precisely half-way through the 7-year Holocaust period, the Nazis were able to kill many more people than they ever dreamed of killing before. However, Nazi engineers suddenly came face-to-face with an unexpected problem: the new, automated "showers" were killing far more people than the ovens could cremate. Bodies began to stack up outside, awaiting cremation. These bodies suddenly presented a health hazard that could not be ignored. Hitler's death camps were threatened with a shut-down unless the engineers could find a solution.
Nazi engineers dug a series of huge trenches, at the bottom of which they placed extremely large natural gas pipes into which had been drilled many holes. When the gas escaping from these holes was ignited, a fiery furnace of almost unbelievable intensity was created. Bodies tossed into this kind of incinerator were consumed before they hit bottom. The problem was ingeniously solved; Hitler's Holocaust continued at a new and much higher, pace. The total number of people killed by Hitler totaled 20 million, including 6 million Jews.
While this number is impressive, Antichrist will kill even more. New Age plans call for a reduction of human population of two-thirds, or 4 billion people. Hitler's problem of body disposal will become even more pronounced when the New World Order Holocaust gets under way, lead by Antichrist.
Can it be that the solution arrived at by New World Order planners is the eating of human flesh, along the order of that old 1950's movie, "Solient Green"? In that movie, human flesh was converted into tasty morsels resembling potato chips. These chips were tasty, and people loved them. As much as you would like to think such a scenario would be impossible to contemplate, I believe this is the reason this Omni article on human organ harvesting took such an unbelievable turn at the end toward cannibalism, the eating of human flesh.
Truly, then, mankind would have become, in the words of the Nobel prize-winning virologist, Carelton Gajdusek, the "neo-cannibals".
Such unbelievable news straight out of the pit of Hell, tells us clearly that we are at the precipice of the New World Order, the Kingdom of Antichrist.
http://www.cuttingedge.org/News/n1364.cfm
Friday, March 20, 2009
Brian Marshall Lies - Fake Cures ~Image Info~
Your a FRAUD Brian Leonard Golightly Marshall !!!
How about the Proof that You have cured anyone of cancer and aids? All we have is your word on anything, that doesnt make it Proof. what happened to Sherrykay? remember her Husband had that Huge terrible sore on his back, and colloidal silver was suppose to cure that. I dont see her singing the praises of Yahweh curing her poor husband, she’s not friends with you anymore. How about MfromCanada1 trying MMS2 didn’t seem to help her and then she stopped being friends with you on youtube. Those things might help some people, but they dont seem to be cure alls. Elaine was really sick and tried colloidal silver and just keep getting sicker. she had to take antibiotics to get rid of it. Actually, in all these yrs, i have known you guys, i havent seen one person come out and say that they have been cured of Cancer etc. from using Brians methods. So if He has cured all these people the news would spread? like wildfire. the media couldn’t hide all of it
BnJ got Nothing better to do but sit around playing on the pc, fudgin up bible codes to prove himself, why arent they out helping people with their BS cures anymore, maybe its cause they dont work? I know CHRIS (DR SODSY) believed in brian for a time and prolly tried his quack medicine knowing he had cancer, and guess what BRIAN MARSHALL (HE STILL DIED) Your a FRAUD and mfromcanada still has morgellons. BnJ go crawl in a hole where you belong and stay there, for the sake of mankind. LOSERS !!!
How about the Proof that You have cured anyone of cancer and aids? All we have is your word on anything, that doesnt make it Proof. what happened to Sherrykay? remember her Husband had that Huge terrible sore on his back, and colloidal silver was suppose to cure that. I dont see her singing the praises of Yahweh curing her poor husband, she’s not friends with you anymore. How about MfromCanada1 trying MMS2 didn’t seem to help her and then she stopped being friends with you on youtube. Those things might help some people, but they dont seem to be cure alls. Elaine was really sick and tried colloidal silver and just keep getting sicker. she had to take antibiotics to get rid of it. Actually, in all these yrs, i have known you guys, i havent seen one person come out and say that they have been cured of Cancer etc. from using Brians methods. So if He has cured all these people the news would spread? like wildfire. the media couldn’t hide all of it
BnJ got Nothing better to do but sit around playing on the pc, fudgin up bible codes to prove himself, why arent they out helping people with their BS cures anymore, maybe its cause they dont work? I know CHRIS (DR SODSY) believed in brian for a time and prolly tried his quack medicine knowing he had cancer, and guess what BRIAN MARSHALL (HE STILL DIED) Your a FRAUD and mfromcanada still has morgellons. BnJ go crawl in a hole where you belong and stay there, for the sake of mankind. LOSERS !!!
Thursday, March 19, 2009
Connecting The H5N1 Dots
rense.com
Connecting The H5N1 Dots
From A.
True Ott PhD
3-18-9
Ok Kiddies, let's play my favorite game again --- connect the dots.
Dot #1: As reported so courageously and well by our new friend, Alexander Jones, Price Waterhouse/Cooper in conjunction with their Chicago client, Baxter Intl., have conspired to keep a lid on what is perhaps THE BIGGEST STORY of the decade --- the PANDEMIC FLU H5N1 mutation bio-engineered by Dr. Taubenberger et. al. at Ft. Detrick was intentionally blended with the HUMAN-SPECIFIC H3N2 virus and sent to 18 European labs as a basis for their VACCINE PRODUCTION -- proving once again that any "pandemic" killing millions of innocents is bio-engineered and will be started via VACCINATIONS.
Dot #2. One of Price Waterhouse/Cooper's single biggest clients? Wall Street giant, Goldman Sachs - a partner with PW in the Satyam scandal in India - similar in many ways to America's Enron "creative accounting" scandal.
See http://in.biz.yahoo.com/090305/203/6zjs5.html
Dot #3. Bush's Treasure Secretary Paulson, the "engineering architect" of the original TARP bailout (and continued "strategic advisor" to current Treasury Secretary Geithner) as well as Obama's "Stimulus Plan" was CEO of Goldman Sachs until assuming the Treasury post.
Dot #4. Goldman Sachs was the primary investment firm that brokered the "shorted" stock purchases in corporations negatively affected by the events of 9-11. The windfall profits were left unclaimed following reports in the Wall Street Journal. No SEC or Congressional investigation by the 9-11 Commission into this "smoking gun" was ever conducted, however.
Dot #5. Paulson's 2006 "salary" from Goldman Sachs? $160 million dollars. This makes the A.I.G. executive bonuses mere chump change. Why would he take over a $159 million dollar "pay cut" to become U.S.
Treasury secretary?????
Dot #6. Paulson used the IRS as his weapon of revenge against an equally corrupt Governor Eliot Spitzer. Why? As New York AG, Spitzer had dared to indict Goldman Sachs for insider trading practices.
V indeed stands for Vendetta -- and Khazarian Jews never forget!!
Dot #7. According to Scotland's "Sunday Herald" newpaper, the Rothschild "City of London"-controlled Royal Bank of Scotland is poised to receive BILLIONS from Obama's "Stimulus Package". Further BILLIONS of U.S. tax dollars go to the CIty of London via A.I.G. re-insuring of derivatives hedged by Barclay Bank of England, Goldman Sachs, and Lloyds of London, Obama keeps the media distracted by venting over mere millions being paid out to A.I.G. executives. All of the ACCOUNTING RECORDS concerning these fraudulent transactions are being kept by --- you guessed it ---- Price Waterhouse/Cooper.
http://www.sundayherald.com/news/heraldnews/display.var.2453817.0.rbs_will_get_billions_in_us_bailout_of_economy.php
Dot #8. Tuesday, March 10, 2009 -- the Dow surged 379 points thanks to a U.S. Treasury "stress test" audit of the TRILLIONS in phony derivatives held by zombie bank - CITIBANK. According to CNBC reporters, GOLDMAN SACHS was given an "insider tip" to this audit, and as a result, grabbed millions of dollars in day-trading profits from the stock surge. The derivatives are then removed from CITIBANK into a MORMON-CHURCH-OWNED account in Key Bank, Salt Lake City, Utah.
For the full story, see
http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/government/fraud/us_government/news.php?q=1236972428
Dot #9. Arabian multi-billionaire, Uncle of Al-Quaida-founder Osama bin Laden, and ARMS DEALER to the rich and powerful ZIONISTS worldwide, Adnan Khashoggi built and finances Key Bank in Salt Lake City, Utah, the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) Basel, Switzerland --- as well as the TRIAD Center that houses the Mormon-Church-owned KSL TV and Radio conglomerates.
See http://www.superiorpics.com/adnan_khashoggi/
Dot #10.
In Adam Lebor's Hitler's Secret Bankers (see also Charles Higham's Trading With the Enemy), we learn how the Basel-based Bank for International
Settlements (BIS) and its American president, Thomas McKittrick, continued trading and money laundering on behalf of the Nazis throughout the Second
World War -- then financed the removal of key Nazi scientists involved in the Nazi EUGENICS movement from Germany into UTAH and South America via the OSS/CIA's "Operation Paper Clip".
Dot #11. BIS is an international organization of central banks established under the globalist Bretton-Woods International Financial scheme.
BIS is closely associated with the Bilderberg Group, the elitist organization established by the Nazi collaborator Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands (see Alden Hatch 's H. R. H. Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands for more on Bernhard's SS connections).
Dot #12. It should be noted that Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner, Obama's point man on the economy and former chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, also sits on the board of directors of BIS (Fed mob boss Ben Bernanke also sits on the board of this one-time Nazi front group that currently controls the IMF and World Bank).
These are the men that President Barack O-Bama has chosen to bring America "Change you can Believe In"???
Dot #13. It is no mistake Bilderberg and Rockefeller stooge Henry Kissinger came out very early in favor of Obama, as did Rockefeller minion and co-founder of the Trilateral Commission, Zbigniew Brzezinski. Obama's appointees are overwhelmingly of the globalist and bankster persuasion - a preponderant number are members of the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderberg Group, and the Trilateral Commission. Financial support for the Obama campaign flowed in from Goldman Sachs, Bear Stearns, Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, J.P. Morgan Chase, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, and others -- ALL POISED TO RECEIVE THE LION'S SHARE OF "BAILOUT" DOLLARS.
OH WHAT A TANGLED WEB HAS BEEN WOVEN.
The bottom line is this. There is no doubt that these MOBSTERS are poised to first strip all remaining wealth out of the British Colony called the United States, then proceed with GENOCIDE followed by CHINESE COMMUNIST possession of the land and real wealth that is AMERICA.
ATRUEOTT@msn.com
http://rense.com/general85/dots.htm
Connecting The H5N1 Dots
From A.
True Ott PhD
3-18-9
Ok Kiddies, let's play my favorite game again --- connect the dots.
Dot #1: As reported so courageously and well by our new friend, Alexander Jones, Price Waterhouse/Cooper in conjunction with their Chicago client, Baxter Intl., have conspired to keep a lid on what is perhaps THE BIGGEST STORY of the decade --- the PANDEMIC FLU H5N1 mutation bio-engineered by Dr. Taubenberger et. al. at Ft. Detrick was intentionally blended with the HUMAN-SPECIFIC H3N2 virus and sent to 18 European labs as a basis for their VACCINE PRODUCTION -- proving once again that any "pandemic" killing millions of innocents is bio-engineered and will be started via VACCINATIONS.
Dot #2. One of Price Waterhouse/Cooper's single biggest clients? Wall Street giant, Goldman Sachs - a partner with PW in the Satyam scandal in India - similar in many ways to America's Enron "creative accounting" scandal.
See http://in.biz.yahoo.com/090305/203/6zjs5.html
Dot #3. Bush's Treasure Secretary Paulson, the "engineering architect" of the original TARP bailout (and continued "strategic advisor" to current Treasury Secretary Geithner) as well as Obama's "Stimulus Plan" was CEO of Goldman Sachs until assuming the Treasury post.
Dot #4. Goldman Sachs was the primary investment firm that brokered the "shorted" stock purchases in corporations negatively affected by the events of 9-11. The windfall profits were left unclaimed following reports in the Wall Street Journal. No SEC or Congressional investigation by the 9-11 Commission into this "smoking gun" was ever conducted, however.
Dot #5. Paulson's 2006 "salary" from Goldman Sachs? $160 million dollars. This makes the A.I.G. executive bonuses mere chump change. Why would he take over a $159 million dollar "pay cut" to become U.S.
Treasury secretary?????
Dot #6. Paulson used the IRS as his weapon of revenge against an equally corrupt Governor Eliot Spitzer. Why? As New York AG, Spitzer had dared to indict Goldman Sachs for insider trading practices.
V indeed stands for Vendetta -- and Khazarian Jews never forget!!
Dot #7. According to Scotland's "Sunday Herald" newpaper, the Rothschild "City of London"-controlled Royal Bank of Scotland is poised to receive BILLIONS from Obama's "Stimulus Package". Further BILLIONS of U.S. tax dollars go to the CIty of London via A.I.G. re-insuring of derivatives hedged by Barclay Bank of England, Goldman Sachs, and Lloyds of London, Obama keeps the media distracted by venting over mere millions being paid out to A.I.G. executives. All of the ACCOUNTING RECORDS concerning these fraudulent transactions are being kept by --- you guessed it ---- Price Waterhouse/Cooper.
http://www.sundayherald.com/news/heraldnews/display.var.2453817.0.rbs_will_get_billions_in_us_bailout_of_economy.php
Dot #8. Tuesday, March 10, 2009 -- the Dow surged 379 points thanks to a U.S. Treasury "stress test" audit of the TRILLIONS in phony derivatives held by zombie bank - CITIBANK. According to CNBC reporters, GOLDMAN SACHS was given an "insider tip" to this audit, and as a result, grabbed millions of dollars in day-trading profits from the stock surge. The derivatives are then removed from CITIBANK into a MORMON-CHURCH-OWNED account in Key Bank, Salt Lake City, Utah.
For the full story, see
http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/government/fraud/us_government/news.php?q=1236972428
Dot #9. Arabian multi-billionaire, Uncle of Al-Quaida-founder Osama bin Laden, and ARMS DEALER to the rich and powerful ZIONISTS worldwide, Adnan Khashoggi built and finances Key Bank in Salt Lake City, Utah, the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) Basel, Switzerland --- as well as the TRIAD Center that houses the Mormon-Church-owned KSL TV and Radio conglomerates.
See http://www.superiorpics.com/adnan_khashoggi/
Dot #10.
In Adam Lebor's Hitler's Secret Bankers (see also Charles Higham's Trading With the Enemy), we learn how the Basel-based Bank for International
Settlements (BIS) and its American president, Thomas McKittrick, continued trading and money laundering on behalf of the Nazis throughout the Second
World War -- then financed the removal of key Nazi scientists involved in the Nazi EUGENICS movement from Germany into UTAH and South America via the OSS/CIA's "Operation Paper Clip".
Dot #11. BIS is an international organization of central banks established under the globalist Bretton-Woods International Financial scheme.
BIS is closely associated with the Bilderberg Group, the elitist organization established by the Nazi collaborator Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands (see Alden Hatch 's H. R. H. Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands for more on Bernhard's SS connections).
Dot #12. It should be noted that Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner, Obama's point man on the economy and former chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, also sits on the board of directors of BIS (Fed mob boss Ben Bernanke also sits on the board of this one-time Nazi front group that currently controls the IMF and World Bank).
These are the men that President Barack O-Bama has chosen to bring America "Change you can Believe In"???
Dot #13. It is no mistake Bilderberg and Rockefeller stooge Henry Kissinger came out very early in favor of Obama, as did Rockefeller minion and co-founder of the Trilateral Commission, Zbigniew Brzezinski. Obama's appointees are overwhelmingly of the globalist and bankster persuasion - a preponderant number are members of the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderberg Group, and the Trilateral Commission. Financial support for the Obama campaign flowed in from Goldman Sachs, Bear Stearns, Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, J.P. Morgan Chase, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, and others -- ALL POISED TO RECEIVE THE LION'S SHARE OF "BAILOUT" DOLLARS.
OH WHAT A TANGLED WEB HAS BEEN WOVEN.
The bottom line is this. There is no doubt that these MOBSTERS are poised to first strip all remaining wealth out of the British Colony called the United States, then proceed with GENOCIDE followed by CHINESE COMMUNIST possession of the land and real wealth that is AMERICA.
ATRUEOTT@msn.com
http://rense.com/general85/dots.htm
Wednesday, March 18, 2009
EDUCATION ABOUT TOXIC VACCINES IS SWEEPING THE NATION
By Mary Tocco
March 18, 2009
Public awareness about problems associated with childhood vaccines is paramount. Concern is spreading like wild-fire. Parents across the country are not just going with the flow; they are questioning the issues of safety, efficacy and lack of long-term studies that the medical community continues to ignore. According to the American Academy of Pediatrics, within a 12- month period, 85% of pediatricians encountered a parent who refused or delayed one or more vaccines and 54% encountered a parent who refused all vaccines. Contrary to what the government would have you believe, the average parent questioning vaccines is not uneducated. These parents make up a group of informed consumers who are determined to make informed vaccine decisions. There is also an increase of people from the mainstream medical community who are now seriously questioning the vaccine status quo.
In 2007, Mary Tocco created a DVD, “Are Vaccines Safe,” which has been viewed by over 120,000 people. Because of the demand for solid factual information, Mary, an independent vaccine investigator, formed the first Vaccine Risk Speakers Bureau. Mary has selected a team of top doctors who are committed to educating the planet about the dangers of toxic vaccines.
Here is a look at her team members:
Andrew Moulden, B.A., M.A., M.D., PhD, is the current leader of Canadian Action Party. Dr. Moulden has attended 6 different Ontario Universities, having attained 4 degrees, including a Bachelors, Masters, Doctorate and Medical degree. He is an Ontario Graduate scholar, Natural Sciences, Engineering and Research Counsel of Canada scholar, and Ontario Mental Health Foundation scholar. He has dedicated his life to this cause and wants all vaccines to stop immediately. Moulden demonstrates how when you inject toxins into the blood stream, it can result in “Blood sludging” which can lead to, “immediate and delayed, acute and chronic, permanent and transient, disease and disorders that cut across all organ systems.” Tissue damage is a result of impaired blood flow and blood 'sludging" in the microscopic vessels throughout the circulatory system. His research is now being used in the US vaccine courts and here is his website.
Todd M. Elsner, DC, just released his book What the Pharmaceutical Companies Don’t Want You to Know About Vaccines... Dr. Elsner spent the last two years digging through CDC records to report shocking facts of how the abortionists and vaccine manufactures work together to “farm live babies” for vaccine development. He will expose how “live” infant brains and other body parts are harvested and sold to the vaccine manufactures. Every pastor of every church needs to hear this message. The Bible commands us in Ephesians 5:11, “Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them.” This is Dr. Elsner’s mission and we need to reach all of the churches and the Christian groups across the nation with this information. He will also expose how childhood vaccines do not protect our children but actually lead to chronic illness. His website.
Renee Tocco, DC, is a Defeat Autism Now! clinician. She and Mary Tocco formed the American Chiropractic Autism Board (ACAB) in 2008. This board is made up of the country’s leading physicians who are helping children with autism and other neurological and health problems recover. The ACAB are consultants for, “Hope for Autism”, a BioNutritional Care training conference for the chiropractic physician. This conference equips the chiropractor to lead in bringing proper care that those suffering with autism urgently need. Dr. Tocco will show how children suffering on the spectrum have a high prevalence for physiological disorders that lead to the outward appearance of autism. Dr. Tocco also exposes the alarming role that antibiotics play in contributing to autism spectrum disorder. She will share with parents and physicians how children with these chronic illnesses can improve and recover. This is the source of hope for America’s children. The website.
Mary Tocco will teach about vaccine production, common vaccine ingredients, the benefits of normal immune system development in comparison to the toxic vaccine program and much more. One of the biggest concerns now is not the mercury but the amount of aluminum in the vaccines. For example, the FDA safe level of aluminum for an infant is about 20 micrograms. The first shot given day one in the hospital, Hepatitis B, has 250 micrograms of aluminum! By the two month well-baby-visit, every child on the normal vaccine schedule is injected with 1875 micrograms of aluminum. Mary will expose shocking facts about different animal viruses that tag along and get injected with the vaccines. She introduces a “Vitalistic Healthcare Lifestyle” that thousands of parents are embracing in an effort to raise their children healthy. Mary’s website.
These speakers and many more will present at the 2009 International Vaccine Risk Symposium held in Charleston, SC May 15, 2009. This conference is for everyone who is concerned about our health freedoms, the decline of our nation’s health, parents of autistic children, physicians, educators and pastors. The next two days, May 16-17, 2009, will be Hope for Autism – a BioNutritional Care training conference for chiropractors and the general public. To learn more about this conference visit Hope for Autism.
Our Vaccine Risk Speakers Bureau is available to speak for any group interested.
Our goal is to reach thousands of people across this nation and around the world. We want to send a clear message to our current administration and our new president that we are not happy with the vaccine program. Only with the help of concerned people will we be able to accomplish this goal. To schedule this team of vaccine experts, call 231-642-7984 or send email to Mary@marytocco.com. We have a window of opportunity unlike never before but we need to take action right now. This quote says it all: “All that is needed for evil to succeed is that decent human beings do nothing.” – Edmund Burke
© 2009 Mary Tocco - All Rights Reserved
Mary Tocco is currently managing/owner of Vitalityhealth LLC, in Charleston, SC and I work with my daughter, Dr. Renee Tocco, who is a chiropractor and the clinic director. I have been working in the chiropractic field since April of 1981. I have organized workshops outside the office on health topics and have been public speaking on health issues for the last thirteen years. I attend yearly vaccine conferences sponsored by the state of Michigan as well as other conferences on issues pertaining to vaccines.
Mary's studies have included natural cooking, natural birthing, home births, breast-feeding. I have had four home births and have successfully raised our five children outside the medical model utilizing a vitalistic healthcare approach (no drugs or surgeries).
I have researched vaccines/immunizations for the last twenty-seven years and in August of 2006; I released my DVD called, “Are Vaccines Safe?”
http://www.newswithviews.com/Tocco/mary103.htm
March 18, 2009
Public awareness about problems associated with childhood vaccines is paramount. Concern is spreading like wild-fire. Parents across the country are not just going with the flow; they are questioning the issues of safety, efficacy and lack of long-term studies that the medical community continues to ignore. According to the American Academy of Pediatrics, within a 12- month period, 85% of pediatricians encountered a parent who refused or delayed one or more vaccines and 54% encountered a parent who refused all vaccines. Contrary to what the government would have you believe, the average parent questioning vaccines is not uneducated. These parents make up a group of informed consumers who are determined to make informed vaccine decisions. There is also an increase of people from the mainstream medical community who are now seriously questioning the vaccine status quo.
In 2007, Mary Tocco created a DVD, “Are Vaccines Safe,” which has been viewed by over 120,000 people. Because of the demand for solid factual information, Mary, an independent vaccine investigator, formed the first Vaccine Risk Speakers Bureau. Mary has selected a team of top doctors who are committed to educating the planet about the dangers of toxic vaccines.
Here is a look at her team members:
Andrew Moulden, B.A., M.A., M.D., PhD, is the current leader of Canadian Action Party. Dr. Moulden has attended 6 different Ontario Universities, having attained 4 degrees, including a Bachelors, Masters, Doctorate and Medical degree. He is an Ontario Graduate scholar, Natural Sciences, Engineering and Research Counsel of Canada scholar, and Ontario Mental Health Foundation scholar. He has dedicated his life to this cause and wants all vaccines to stop immediately. Moulden demonstrates how when you inject toxins into the blood stream, it can result in “Blood sludging” which can lead to, “immediate and delayed, acute and chronic, permanent and transient, disease and disorders that cut across all organ systems.” Tissue damage is a result of impaired blood flow and blood 'sludging" in the microscopic vessels throughout the circulatory system. His research is now being used in the US vaccine courts and here is his website.
Todd M. Elsner, DC, just released his book What the Pharmaceutical Companies Don’t Want You to Know About Vaccines... Dr. Elsner spent the last two years digging through CDC records to report shocking facts of how the abortionists and vaccine manufactures work together to “farm live babies” for vaccine development. He will expose how “live” infant brains and other body parts are harvested and sold to the vaccine manufactures. Every pastor of every church needs to hear this message. The Bible commands us in Ephesians 5:11, “Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them.” This is Dr. Elsner’s mission and we need to reach all of the churches and the Christian groups across the nation with this information. He will also expose how childhood vaccines do not protect our children but actually lead to chronic illness. His website.
Renee Tocco, DC, is a Defeat Autism Now! clinician. She and Mary Tocco formed the American Chiropractic Autism Board (ACAB) in 2008. This board is made up of the country’s leading physicians who are helping children with autism and other neurological and health problems recover. The ACAB are consultants for, “Hope for Autism”, a BioNutritional Care training conference for the chiropractic physician. This conference equips the chiropractor to lead in bringing proper care that those suffering with autism urgently need. Dr. Tocco will show how children suffering on the spectrum have a high prevalence for physiological disorders that lead to the outward appearance of autism. Dr. Tocco also exposes the alarming role that antibiotics play in contributing to autism spectrum disorder. She will share with parents and physicians how children with these chronic illnesses can improve and recover. This is the source of hope for America’s children. The website.
Mary Tocco will teach about vaccine production, common vaccine ingredients, the benefits of normal immune system development in comparison to the toxic vaccine program and much more. One of the biggest concerns now is not the mercury but the amount of aluminum in the vaccines. For example, the FDA safe level of aluminum for an infant is about 20 micrograms. The first shot given day one in the hospital, Hepatitis B, has 250 micrograms of aluminum! By the two month well-baby-visit, every child on the normal vaccine schedule is injected with 1875 micrograms of aluminum. Mary will expose shocking facts about different animal viruses that tag along and get injected with the vaccines. She introduces a “Vitalistic Healthcare Lifestyle” that thousands of parents are embracing in an effort to raise their children healthy. Mary’s website.
These speakers and many more will present at the 2009 International Vaccine Risk Symposium held in Charleston, SC May 15, 2009. This conference is for everyone who is concerned about our health freedoms, the decline of our nation’s health, parents of autistic children, physicians, educators and pastors. The next two days, May 16-17, 2009, will be Hope for Autism – a BioNutritional Care training conference for chiropractors and the general public. To learn more about this conference visit Hope for Autism.
Our Vaccine Risk Speakers Bureau is available to speak for any group interested.
Our goal is to reach thousands of people across this nation and around the world. We want to send a clear message to our current administration and our new president that we are not happy with the vaccine program. Only with the help of concerned people will we be able to accomplish this goal. To schedule this team of vaccine experts, call 231-642-7984 or send email to Mary@marytocco.com. We have a window of opportunity unlike never before but we need to take action right now. This quote says it all: “All that is needed for evil to succeed is that decent human beings do nothing.” – Edmund Burke
© 2009 Mary Tocco - All Rights Reserved
Mary Tocco is currently managing/owner of Vitalityhealth LLC, in Charleston, SC and I work with my daughter, Dr. Renee Tocco, who is a chiropractor and the clinic director. I have been working in the chiropractic field since April of 1981. I have organized workshops outside the office on health topics and have been public speaking on health issues for the last thirteen years. I attend yearly vaccine conferences sponsored by the state of Michigan as well as other conferences on issues pertaining to vaccines.
Mary's studies have included natural cooking, natural birthing, home births, breast-feeding. I have had four home births and have successfully raised our five children outside the medical model utilizing a vitalistic healthcare approach (no drugs or surgeries).
I have researched vaccines/immunizations for the last twenty-seven years and in August of 2006; I released my DVD called, “Are Vaccines Safe?”
http://www.newswithviews.com/Tocco/mary103.htm
Tuesday, March 17, 2009
Brian Marshall Lies - ABC TELEVISION NEW GUINEA AIDS ~Image Info~
Your a FRAUD Brian Leonard Golightly Marshall !!!
How about the Proof that You have cured anyone of cancer and aids? All we have is your word on anything, that doesnt make it Proof. what happened to Sherrykay? remember her Husband had that Huge terrible sore on his back, and colloidal silver was suppose to cure that. I dont see her singing the praises of Yahweh curing her poor husband, she’s not friends with you anymore. How about MfromCanada1 trying MMS2 didn’t seem to help her and then she stopped being friends with you on youtube. Those things might help some people, but they dont seem to be cure alls. Elaine was really sick and tried colloidal silver and just keep getting sicker. she had to take antibiotics to get rid of it. Actually, in all these yrs, i have known you guys, i havent seen one person come out and say that they have been cured of Cancer etc. from using Brians methods. So if He has cured all these people the news would spread? like wildfire. the media couldn’t hide all of it
BnJ got Nothing better to do but sit around playing on the pc, fudgin up bible codes to prove himself, why arent they out helping people with their BS cures anymore, maybe its cause they dont work? I know CHRIS (DR SODSY) believed in brian for a time and prolly tried his quack medicine knowing he had cancer, and guess what BRIAN MARSHALL (HE STILL DIED) Your a FRAUD and mfromcanada still has morgellons. BnJ go crawl in a hole where you belong and stay there, for the sake of mankind. LOSERS !!!
How about the Proof that You have cured anyone of cancer and aids? All we have is your word on anything, that doesnt make it Proof. what happened to Sherrykay? remember her Husband had that Huge terrible sore on his back, and colloidal silver was suppose to cure that. I dont see her singing the praises of Yahweh curing her poor husband, she’s not friends with you anymore. How about MfromCanada1 trying MMS2 didn’t seem to help her and then she stopped being friends with you on youtube. Those things might help some people, but they dont seem to be cure alls. Elaine was really sick and tried colloidal silver and just keep getting sicker. she had to take antibiotics to get rid of it. Actually, in all these yrs, i have known you guys, i havent seen one person come out and say that they have been cured of Cancer etc. from using Brians methods. So if He has cured all these people the news would spread? like wildfire. the media couldn’t hide all of it
BnJ got Nothing better to do but sit around playing on the pc, fudgin up bible codes to prove himself, why arent they out helping people with their BS cures anymore, maybe its cause they dont work? I know CHRIS (DR SODSY) believed in brian for a time and prolly tried his quack medicine knowing he had cancer, and guess what BRIAN MARSHALL (HE STILL DIED) Your a FRAUD and mfromcanada still has morgellons. BnJ go crawl in a hole where you belong and stay there, for the sake of mankind. LOSERS !!!
Monday, March 16, 2009
Nobody listens to the real climate change experts
The minds of world leaders are firmly shut to anything but the fantasies of the scaremongers, says Christopher Booker.
By Christopher Booker
Last Updated: 12:46PM GMT 16 Mar 2009
Cold comfort: If the present trend continues, the world will be 1.1C cooler in 2100
Considering how the fear of global warming is inspiring the world's politicians to put forward the most costly and economically damaging package of measures ever imposed on mankind, it is obviously important that we can trust the basis on which all this is being proposed. Last week two international conferences addressed this issue and the contrast between them could not have been starker.
The first in Copenhagen, billed as "an emergency summit on climate change" and attracting acres of worldwide media coverage, was explicitly designed to stoke up the fear of global warming to an unprecedented pitch. As one of the organisers put it, "this is not a regular scientific conference: this is a deliberate attempt to influence policy".
What worries them are all the signs that when the world's politicians converge on Copenhagen in December to discuss a successor to the Kyoto Protocol, under the guidance of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), there will be so much disagreement that they may not get the much more drastic measures to cut carbon emissions that the alarmists are calling for.
Thus the name of the game last week, as we see from a sample of quotations, was to win headlines by claiming that everything is far worse than previously supposed. Sea level rises by 2100 could be "much greater than the 59cm predicted by the last IPCC report". Global warming could kill off 85 per cent of the Amazon rainforest, "much more than previously predicted". The ice caps in Greenland and Antarctica are melting "much faster than predicted". The number of people dying from heat could be "twice as many as previously predicted".
None of the government-funded scientists making these claims were particularly distinguished, but they succeeded in their object, as the media cheerfully recycled all this wild scaremongering without bothering to check the scientific facts.
What a striking contrast this was to the second conference, which I attended with 700 others in New York, organised by the Heartland Institute under the title Global Warming: Was It Ever Really A Crisis?. In Britain this received no coverage at all, apart from a sneering mention by The Guardian, although it was addressed by dozens of expert scientists, not a few of world rank, who for professional standing put those in Copenhagen in the shade.
Led off with stirring speeches from the Czech President Vaclav Klaus, the acting head of the European Union, and Professor Richard Lindzen of MIT, perhaps the most distinguished climatologist in the world, the message of this gathering was that the scare over global warming has been deliberately stoked up for political reasons and has long since parted company with proper scientific evidence.
Nothing has more acutely demonstrated this than the reliance of the IPCC on computer models to predict what is going to happen to global temperatures over the next 100 years. On these predictions, that temperatures are likely to rise by up to 5.3C, all their other predictions and recommendations depend, yet nearly 10 years into the 21st century it is already painfully clear that the computer forecasts are going hopelessly astray. Far from rising with CO2, as the models are programmed to predict they should, the satellite-measured temperature curve has flattened out and then dropped. If the present trend were to continue, the world in 2100 would not in fact be hotter but 1.1C cooler than the 1979-1998 average.
Yet it is on this fundamental inability of the computer models to predict what has already happened that all else hangs. For two days in New York we heard distinguished experts, such as Professor Syun-Ichi Akasofu, former director of the International Arctic Research Center, Dr Willie Soon of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics and Professor Paul Reiter of the Pasteur Institute, authoritatively (and often wittily) tear apart one piece of the scare orthodoxy after another.
Sea levels are not shooting up but only continuing their modest 3mm a year rise over the past 200 years. The vast Antarctic ice-sheet is not melting, except in one tiny corner, the Antarctic Peninsula. Tropical hurricane activity, far from increasing, is at its lowest level for 30 years. The best correlation for temperature fluctuations is not CO2 but the magnetic activity of the sun. (For an admirable summary of proceedings by the Australian paleoclimatologist Professor Bob Carter, Google "Heartland" and "Quadrant").
Yet the terrifying thing, as President Klaus observed in his magisterial opening address, is that there is no dialogue on these issues. When recently at the World Economic Forum in Davos, he found the minds of his fellow world leaders firmly shut to anything but the fantasies of the scaremongers. As I said in my own modest contribution to the conference, there seems little doubt that global warming is leading the world towards an unprecedented catastrophe. But it is not the Technicolor apocalypse promised by the likes of Al Gore. The real disaster hanging over us lies in all those astronomically costly measures proposed by politicians, to meet a crisis which in reality never existed.
A perspective on New York that is like a look back in time
On my first visit to New York 45 years ago I was stunned by its scale and modernity. Not having been there since, it was a shock to see how tatty and dated the city now seems. When I went up the Empire State Building (now 80 years old) with my son Nick, we were struck by how small the city looks, and how soon it gives way to countryside and sea.
I recalled Scott Fitzgerald’s essay My Lost City, describing how he returned two years after the Wall Street Crash to see the “last and most magnificent of towers” rising “from the ruins”. Going up it, he “discovered the crowning error of the city, its Pandora’s Box. Full of vaunting pride, the New Yorker had climbed here and seen with dismay what he had never suspected. That the city was not the endless succession of canyons that he had supposed, but that it had limits.
From the tallest structure he saw for the first time that it faded out into the country on all sides, into an expanse of blue and green that was limitless”. New York “was a city after all and not a universe”. “The whole shining edifice he had reared in his imagination came crashing to the ground”. As Nick, who works in India, observed, “New York is a museum to the 20th century”. But it was still a pleasure to visit.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/4990704/Nobody-listens-to-the-real-climate-change-experts.html
By Christopher Booker
Last Updated: 12:46PM GMT 16 Mar 2009
Cold comfort: If the present trend continues, the world will be 1.1C cooler in 2100
Considering how the fear of global warming is inspiring the world's politicians to put forward the most costly and economically damaging package of measures ever imposed on mankind, it is obviously important that we can trust the basis on which all this is being proposed. Last week two international conferences addressed this issue and the contrast between them could not have been starker.
The first in Copenhagen, billed as "an emergency summit on climate change" and attracting acres of worldwide media coverage, was explicitly designed to stoke up the fear of global warming to an unprecedented pitch. As one of the organisers put it, "this is not a regular scientific conference: this is a deliberate attempt to influence policy".
What worries them are all the signs that when the world's politicians converge on Copenhagen in December to discuss a successor to the Kyoto Protocol, under the guidance of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), there will be so much disagreement that they may not get the much more drastic measures to cut carbon emissions that the alarmists are calling for.
Thus the name of the game last week, as we see from a sample of quotations, was to win headlines by claiming that everything is far worse than previously supposed. Sea level rises by 2100 could be "much greater than the 59cm predicted by the last IPCC report". Global warming could kill off 85 per cent of the Amazon rainforest, "much more than previously predicted". The ice caps in Greenland and Antarctica are melting "much faster than predicted". The number of people dying from heat could be "twice as many as previously predicted".
None of the government-funded scientists making these claims were particularly distinguished, but they succeeded in their object, as the media cheerfully recycled all this wild scaremongering without bothering to check the scientific facts.
What a striking contrast this was to the second conference, which I attended with 700 others in New York, organised by the Heartland Institute under the title Global Warming: Was It Ever Really A Crisis?. In Britain this received no coverage at all, apart from a sneering mention by The Guardian, although it was addressed by dozens of expert scientists, not a few of world rank, who for professional standing put those in Copenhagen in the shade.
Led off with stirring speeches from the Czech President Vaclav Klaus, the acting head of the European Union, and Professor Richard Lindzen of MIT, perhaps the most distinguished climatologist in the world, the message of this gathering was that the scare over global warming has been deliberately stoked up for political reasons and has long since parted company with proper scientific evidence.
Nothing has more acutely demonstrated this than the reliance of the IPCC on computer models to predict what is going to happen to global temperatures over the next 100 years. On these predictions, that temperatures are likely to rise by up to 5.3C, all their other predictions and recommendations depend, yet nearly 10 years into the 21st century it is already painfully clear that the computer forecasts are going hopelessly astray. Far from rising with CO2, as the models are programmed to predict they should, the satellite-measured temperature curve has flattened out and then dropped. If the present trend were to continue, the world in 2100 would not in fact be hotter but 1.1C cooler than the 1979-1998 average.
Yet it is on this fundamental inability of the computer models to predict what has already happened that all else hangs. For two days in New York we heard distinguished experts, such as Professor Syun-Ichi Akasofu, former director of the International Arctic Research Center, Dr Willie Soon of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics and Professor Paul Reiter of the Pasteur Institute, authoritatively (and often wittily) tear apart one piece of the scare orthodoxy after another.
Sea levels are not shooting up but only continuing their modest 3mm a year rise over the past 200 years. The vast Antarctic ice-sheet is not melting, except in one tiny corner, the Antarctic Peninsula. Tropical hurricane activity, far from increasing, is at its lowest level for 30 years. The best correlation for temperature fluctuations is not CO2 but the magnetic activity of the sun. (For an admirable summary of proceedings by the Australian paleoclimatologist Professor Bob Carter, Google "Heartland" and "Quadrant").
Yet the terrifying thing, as President Klaus observed in his magisterial opening address, is that there is no dialogue on these issues. When recently at the World Economic Forum in Davos, he found the minds of his fellow world leaders firmly shut to anything but the fantasies of the scaremongers. As I said in my own modest contribution to the conference, there seems little doubt that global warming is leading the world towards an unprecedented catastrophe. But it is not the Technicolor apocalypse promised by the likes of Al Gore. The real disaster hanging over us lies in all those astronomically costly measures proposed by politicians, to meet a crisis which in reality never existed.
A perspective on New York that is like a look back in time
On my first visit to New York 45 years ago I was stunned by its scale and modernity. Not having been there since, it was a shock to see how tatty and dated the city now seems. When I went up the Empire State Building (now 80 years old) with my son Nick, we were struck by how small the city looks, and how soon it gives way to countryside and sea.
I recalled Scott Fitzgerald’s essay My Lost City, describing how he returned two years after the Wall Street Crash to see the “last and most magnificent of towers” rising “from the ruins”. Going up it, he “discovered the crowning error of the city, its Pandora’s Box. Full of vaunting pride, the New Yorker had climbed here and seen with dismay what he had never suspected. That the city was not the endless succession of canyons that he had supposed, but that it had limits.
From the tallest structure he saw for the first time that it faded out into the country on all sides, into an expanse of blue and green that was limitless”. New York “was a city after all and not a universe”. “The whole shining edifice he had reared in his imagination came crashing to the ground”. As Nick, who works in India, observed, “New York is a museum to the 20th century”. But it was still a pleasure to visit.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/4990704/Nobody-listens-to-the-real-climate-change-experts.html
Fox Admits To Planting Political Brainwashing In Popular TV
Rupert Murdoch’s Twentieth Century Fox corporation has admitted to planting political brainwashing within its globally popular TV shows and indeed boasts that it is proud of the fact.
A corporate video currently being showcased on another part of Murdoch’s media empire, MySpace. com, shows Fox executives and stars of its universally recognized shows bragging about how they use the platform of hit shows that are broadcast globally to implant messages about the supposed threat of global warming.
This is not the first time Fox have been enthusiastic in propagandizing for the establishment. In 2003, Rupert Murdoch himself admitted that the corporation had “tried” to help the Bush administration sell the war in Iraq.
The text accompanying the video states, “In 2006, News Corp. embarked upon a company wide initiative to reduce the size of its carbon footprint.”
The means by which this “initiative” was carried out is then made clear by a plethora of clips from Fox’s most popular shows - the Simpsons, King of the Hill, Family Guy, Prison Break - which are all loaded with messages about global warming and the need to do something about it.
“What could we do on a practical level to start making a difference,” asks one executive before another answers, “The biggest thing we’ve done is inserting messages about the environment into some of our content.”
In other words, Fox has embarked on a deliberate campaign, which could only have been done with the coordination of the script writers of each program, to force people to accept the pseudo-science of global warming by brainwashing them into accepting it as a reality. This has been achieved by weaving in messages about climate change and having popular characters in the TV shows embrace specific tenants of the global warming manifesto.
“The most powerful way we could communicate the commitment on behalf of our company, was to change the practices within the production, as well as work in a message about global warming, about environmental changes, about empowering people to take responsibilities,” states Fox chairman Dana Walden.
We’re also treated to the vomit-inducing sight of Kiefer Sutherland, who plays the torture loving Jack Bauer in 24, sounding about as genuine as a 3 dollar bill reading off a teleprompter about how Fox is committed to reducing its “carbon footprint”.
This again goes to show that the acceptance of global warming as a reality by the general public is not being accomplished as an organic reaction to scientifically proven threats, but by propagandists artificially piggy-backing the climate mantra on the back of fictional TV shows passively absorbed by people in their millions.
This is key because of the process that people’s brains undergo when they are watching television. Political messages implanted in fictional television programs will always enjoy a receptive audience.
According to an Associated Content article, “Studies have shown that watching television induces low alpha waves in the human brain. Alpha waves are brainwaves between 8 to 12 HZ. and are commonly associated with relaxed meditative states as well as brain states associated with suggestibility.”
Experiments have shown that less than one minute after the viewer begins to watch television, the brain switches from Beta level consciousness, associated with active and logical thought, to Alpha level, which is associated with passive acceptance and suggestibility. This is why advertisers spend billions a year on commercials as well as product placement within TV shows themselves.
The scale of what Fox is admitting to here is staggering, and the fact that they even boast about what they are doing beggars belief. As Darryl Mason sardonically comments, “I never realised just how much I’d learned about the dire threats of global warming-induced climate change simply by watching immensely, globally popular Murdoch/Fox entertainments like The Simpsons and 24.”
Millions of people not just in America but globally are being educated, or should I say re-educated, about the highly complex and highly debatable topic of global warming, not through a reasoned public debate between advocates and skeptics, but through fictional cartoons, comedies and drama shows produced by a monolithic corporation that has its tentacles deeply embedded into the same establishment that is trying to sell global warming in order to introduce a CO2 tax and regulate people’s lives.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/fox-admits-to-planting-political-brainwashing-in-popular-tv-shows.html
A corporate video currently being showcased on another part of Murdoch’s media empire, MySpace. com, shows Fox executives and stars of its universally recognized shows bragging about how they use the platform of hit shows that are broadcast globally to implant messages about the supposed threat of global warming.
This is not the first time Fox have been enthusiastic in propagandizing for the establishment. In 2003, Rupert Murdoch himself admitted that the corporation had “tried” to help the Bush administration sell the war in Iraq.
The text accompanying the video states, “In 2006, News Corp. embarked upon a company wide initiative to reduce the size of its carbon footprint.”
The means by which this “initiative” was carried out is then made clear by a plethora of clips from Fox’s most popular shows - the Simpsons, King of the Hill, Family Guy, Prison Break - which are all loaded with messages about global warming and the need to do something about it.
“What could we do on a practical level to start making a difference,” asks one executive before another answers, “The biggest thing we’ve done is inserting messages about the environment into some of our content.”
In other words, Fox has embarked on a deliberate campaign, which could only have been done with the coordination of the script writers of each program, to force people to accept the pseudo-science of global warming by brainwashing them into accepting it as a reality. This has been achieved by weaving in messages about climate change and having popular characters in the TV shows embrace specific tenants of the global warming manifesto.
“The most powerful way we could communicate the commitment on behalf of our company, was to change the practices within the production, as well as work in a message about global warming, about environmental changes, about empowering people to take responsibilities,” states Fox chairman Dana Walden.
We’re also treated to the vomit-inducing sight of Kiefer Sutherland, who plays the torture loving Jack Bauer in 24, sounding about as genuine as a 3 dollar bill reading off a teleprompter about how Fox is committed to reducing its “carbon footprint”.
This again goes to show that the acceptance of global warming as a reality by the general public is not being accomplished as an organic reaction to scientifically proven threats, but by propagandists artificially piggy-backing the climate mantra on the back of fictional TV shows passively absorbed by people in their millions.
This is key because of the process that people’s brains undergo when they are watching television. Political messages implanted in fictional television programs will always enjoy a receptive audience.
According to an Associated Content article, “Studies have shown that watching television induces low alpha waves in the human brain. Alpha waves are brainwaves between 8 to 12 HZ. and are commonly associated with relaxed meditative states as well as brain states associated with suggestibility.”
Experiments have shown that less than one minute after the viewer begins to watch television, the brain switches from Beta level consciousness, associated with active and logical thought, to Alpha level, which is associated with passive acceptance and suggestibility. This is why advertisers spend billions a year on commercials as well as product placement within TV shows themselves.
The scale of what Fox is admitting to here is staggering, and the fact that they even boast about what they are doing beggars belief. As Darryl Mason sardonically comments, “I never realised just how much I’d learned about the dire threats of global warming-induced climate change simply by watching immensely, globally popular Murdoch/Fox entertainments like The Simpsons and 24.”
Millions of people not just in America but globally are being educated, or should I say re-educated, about the highly complex and highly debatable topic of global warming, not through a reasoned public debate between advocates and skeptics, but through fictional cartoons, comedies and drama shows produced by a monolithic corporation that has its tentacles deeply embedded into the same establishment that is trying to sell global warming in order to introduce a CO2 tax and regulate people’s lives.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/fox-admits-to-planting-political-brainwashing-in-popular-tv-shows.html
We're the Government -- and You're Not! 545 vs 300,000,000
Finally, Somebody puts the blame where it belongs
This post was written by admin on March 15, 2009
I received this email this morning.
It may or may not be true that this person wrote it.
That said though, I am posting it here because people need to understand who actually is responsible when they have no jobs because our corporations are given a tax rebate for putting us out of work, and many millions of other things that are crippling our great country.
If you believe as I do, that these people are the real reason behind all of our problems, including giving companies like AIG our money so that they can turn around and give 10% of it to themselves as bonuses for running the company into the ground, then tell your friends about this article and get them to tell their friends.
After all, there are over 300 million of us, and less then 1,000 of them and its time we stand up and say the buck stops with you, so put up or get out so that we can get somebody in there that will stand up for the American people and the American Dream.
545 vs 300,000,000
EVERY CITIZEN NEEDS TO READ THIS AND THINK ABOUT WHAT THIS JOURNALIST HAS SCRIPTED IN THIS MESSAGE. READ IT AND THEN REALLY THINK ABOUT OUR CURRENT POLITICAL DEBACLE.
Charley Reese has been a journalist for 49 years.
545 PEOPLE
By Charlie Reese
Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.
Have you ever wondered, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits?
Have you ever wondered, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes?
You and I don't propose a federal budget. The president does.
You and I don't have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does.
You and I don't write the tax code, Congress does.
You and I don't set fiscal policy, Congress does.
You and I don't control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.
One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one president, and nine Supreme Court justices 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.
I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank.
I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a president to do one cotton-pickingthing . I don't care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash.
The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator's responsibility to determine how he votes.
Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party.
What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating deficits. The president can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it.
The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes. Who is the speaker of the House? Nancy Pelosi. She is the leader of the majority party.
She and fellow House members, not the president, can approve any budget they want. If the president vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to.
It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million can not replace 545 people who stand convicted -- by present facts -- of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can't think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.
If the tax code is unfair, it's because they want it unfair.
If the budget is in the red, it's because they want it in the red.
If the Army & Marines are in IRAQ , it's because they want them in IRAQ
If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it's because they want it that way.
There are no insoluble government problems.
Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power. Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like "the economy," "inflation," or "politics" that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.
Those 545 people, and they alone, are responsible.
They, and they alone, have the power.
They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses.
Provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees.
We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!
Charlie Reese is a former columnist of the Orlando Sentinel Newspaper.
What you do with this article now that you have read it.......... Is up to you.
http://keepamericaatwork.com/?p=1264
This post was written by admin on March 15, 2009
I received this email this morning.
It may or may not be true that this person wrote it.
That said though, I am posting it here because people need to understand who actually is responsible when they have no jobs because our corporations are given a tax rebate for putting us out of work, and many millions of other things that are crippling our great country.
If you believe as I do, that these people are the real reason behind all of our problems, including giving companies like AIG our money so that they can turn around and give 10% of it to themselves as bonuses for running the company into the ground, then tell your friends about this article and get them to tell their friends.
After all, there are over 300 million of us, and less then 1,000 of them and its time we stand up and say the buck stops with you, so put up or get out so that we can get somebody in there that will stand up for the American people and the American Dream.
545 vs 300,000,000
EVERY CITIZEN NEEDS TO READ THIS AND THINK ABOUT WHAT THIS JOURNALIST HAS SCRIPTED IN THIS MESSAGE. READ IT AND THEN REALLY THINK ABOUT OUR CURRENT POLITICAL DEBACLE.
Charley Reese has been a journalist for 49 years.
545 PEOPLE
By Charlie Reese
Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.
Have you ever wondered, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits?
Have you ever wondered, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes?
You and I don't propose a federal budget. The president does.
You and I don't have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does.
You and I don't write the tax code, Congress does.
You and I don't set fiscal policy, Congress does.
You and I don't control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.
One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one president, and nine Supreme Court justices 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.
I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank.
I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a president to do one cotton-pickingthing . I don't care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash.
The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator's responsibility to determine how he votes.
Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party.
What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating deficits. The president can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it.
The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes. Who is the speaker of the House? Nancy Pelosi. She is the leader of the majority party.
She and fellow House members, not the president, can approve any budget they want. If the president vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to.
It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million can not replace 545 people who stand convicted -- by present facts -- of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can't think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.
If the tax code is unfair, it's because they want it unfair.
If the budget is in the red, it's because they want it in the red.
If the Army & Marines are in IRAQ , it's because they want them in IRAQ
If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it's because they want it that way.
There are no insoluble government problems.
Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power. Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like "the economy," "inflation," or "politics" that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.
Those 545 people, and they alone, are responsible.
They, and they alone, have the power.
They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses.
Provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees.
We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!
Charlie Reese is a former columnist of the Orlando Sentinel Newspaper.
What you do with this article now that you have read it.......... Is up to you.
http://keepamericaatwork.com/?p=1264
Meet Monsanto’s Executive Officers
Hugh Grant
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Brett D. Begemann
Executive Vice President, Global Commercial
Carl M. Casale
Executive Vice President, Strategy and Operations
Richard B. Clark
Vice President and Controller
Terrell K. Crews
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Vegetable Business CEO
Scarlett Lee Foster
Vice President, Investor Relations
Dr. Robert T. Fraley
Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer
Tom D. Hartley
Vice President and Treasurer
Janet M. Holloway
Senior Vice President, Chief of Staff and Community Relations
Mark J. Leidy
Executive Vice President, Manufacturing
Steven C. Mizell
Executive Vice President, Human Resources
Cheryl P. Morley
Senior Vice President, Corporate Strategy
Kerry J. Preete
Vice President, International Commercial
Nicole M. Ringenberg
Vice President, Finance & Operations, Global Commercial
David F. Snively
Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel
Gerald A. Steiner
Executive Vice President, Sustainability & Corporate Affairs
Some current leaders may include work experience with the "old" Monsanto Company, Pharmacia Corp. or Solutia Inc. prior to the formation of the new Monsanto, focused solely on agriculture, in 2000.
http://www.monsanto.com/who_we_are/leadership.asp
Board of Directors
(Note: Ages as of January 14, 2009)
Frank V. AtLee III, 68, is a retired president of the former American Cyanamid Company and chairman of the former Cyanamid International. Both companies were involved in the discovery, development, manufacturing and marketing of medical and agricultural products. Mr. AtLee served Monsanto as chairman of the board and chair of the Executive Committee from June 2000 to October 2003. He was Monsanto's interim president and chief executive officer from December 2002 to May 2003. He is a member of the Audit and Finance Committee and the Science and Technology Committee.
Mr. AtLee has been elected to a term that expires in 2010.
John W. Bachmann, 70, is a senior partner of Edward Jones, a major financial services firm that advises individual investors exclusively. From 1980 until 2004, Mr. Bachmann served as managing partner of Edward Jones. Mr. Bachmann was elected to the Monsanto board in May 2004 and is a member of the Audit and Finance Committee and the People and Compensation Committee. He also serves on the boards of AMR Corporation and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, where he was the chairman of the board for 2004-2005.
Mr. Bachmann has been elected to a term that expires 2011.
Janice L. Fields, 53, is executive vice president and chief operating officer of McDonald’s USA, LLC, a subsidiary of McDonald’s Corporation, the world’s leading global foodservice retailer. She served as president, McDonald’s Central Division from 2003 to 2006, and has been with McDonald’s USA for more than 30 years. Ms. Fields was elected to the Monsanto board in April 2008 and is a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Public Policy and Corporate Responsibility Committee and the Science and Technology Committee.
Ms. Fields has been elected to a term that expires in 2012.
Hugh Grant, 50, is chairman of the board, president, and chief executive officer of Monsanto. He joined the former Monsanto as a product development representative for the company's agricultural business in 1981. Since 1991, he has held a variety of management positions, most recently as executive vice president and chief operating officer. Mr. Grant chairs the Executive Committee. He also serves on the board of PPG Industries, Inc. He has lived and worked in a number of international locations including Asia and Europe, as well as the United States.
Mr. Grant has been elected to a term that expires in 2012.
Arthur H. Harper, 53, is managing partner of GenNx360 Capital Partners, a private equity firm focused on business to business companies. He served as president and chief executive officer - Equipment Services Division, General Electric Corporation from 2002 to 2005 and executive vice president - GE Capital Services, General Electric Corporation from 2001 to 2002. Mr. Harper was elected to the Monsanto board in October 2006 and is a member of the Public Policy and Corporate Responsibility Committee and the Science and Technology Committee. He also serves on the board of Gannett Co., Inc.
Mr. Harper has been elected to a term that expires in 2010.
Gwendolyn S. King, 68, is president of Podium Prose, a speakers bureau. From 1992 to her retirement in 1998, Mrs. King was senior vice president, corporate and public affairs, for PECO Energy Company, now Exelon, a diversified utility company. From 1989 through 1992, Mrs. King served as the 11th Commissioner of Social Security. Prior to her appointment, she was deputy assistant to the President and director of Intergovernmental Affairs for President Ronald Regan. Mrs. King has served as a director on the Monsanto board since February 2001. She chairs the board's Public Policy and Corporate Responsibility Committee, and she is a member of the People and Compensation Committee, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Mrs. King also serves on the boards of Lockheed Martin Corporation and Marsh and McLennan Companies Inc.
Mrs. King has been elected to a term that expires in 2010.
C. Steven McMillan, 63, is a retired chairman of the board and chief executive officer of Sara Lee Corporation, a global consumer packaged goods company whose brands include Sara Lee, Hillshire Farms, Earth Grains, Jimmy Dean, and Douwe Egberts. He has served as a director on the Monsanto board since June 2000. Mr. McMillan chairs the board's People and Compensation Committee, and he is a member of the Audit and Finance Committee and of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
Mr. McMillan has been elected to a term that expires in 2012.
William U. Parfet, 62, is chairman of the board and chief executive officer of MPI Research Inc., a preclinical toxicology research laboratory. He has served as a director on the Monsanto board since June 2000. Mr. Parfet chairs the board's Audit and Finance Committee, and he is a member of the People and Compensation Committee and the Executive Committee. He also serves on the boards of Stryker Corporation and Taubman Centers, Inc.
Mr. Parfet has been elected to a term that expires in 2011.
George H. Poste, Ph. D., D.V.M., 64, is chief executive of Health Technology Networks, a consulting group specializing in the application of genomics technologies and computing in healthcare. In February 2009, he assumed the post of Chief Scientist, Complex Adaptive Systems Initiative at Arizona State University. From May 2003 to February 2009, he was director of the Arizona Biodesign Institute at Arizona State University. Dr. Poste is a member of the Defense Science Board and the Health Board of the U.S. Department of Defense. He is a Fellow of the Royal Society, the Royal College of Pathologist and the UK Academy of Medicine and Distinguished Fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University. Dr. Poste is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. He has served on the Monsanto board since February 2003. Dr. Poste chairs the Science and Technology Committee and is a member of the Public Policy and Corporate Responsibility Committee. Dr. Poste also serves on the boards of Exelixis, Inc. and Orchid Cellmark Inc.
Dr. Poste has been elected to a term that expires in 2011.
Robert J. Stevens, 57, is chairman of the board, president and chief executive officer of Lockheed Martin Corporation, a firm engaged in the research, design, development, manufacture and integration of advanced-technology systems, products and services. During 2001 and 2002, he served on President George W. Bush's Commission to Examine the Future of the United States Aerospace Industry. Mr. Stevens has served as a director on the Monsanto board since August 2002. He chairs the board's Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and he is a member of the Audit and Finance Committee and of the Executive Committee. He also serves as Monsanto's presiding director.
Mr. Stevens has been elected to a term that expires in 2012.
http://www.monsanto.com/responsibility/corp_gov/directors.asp
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Brett D. Begemann
Executive Vice President, Global Commercial
Carl M. Casale
Executive Vice President, Strategy and Operations
Richard B. Clark
Vice President and Controller
Terrell K. Crews
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Vegetable Business CEO
Scarlett Lee Foster
Vice President, Investor Relations
Dr. Robert T. Fraley
Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer
Tom D. Hartley
Vice President and Treasurer
Janet M. Holloway
Senior Vice President, Chief of Staff and Community Relations
Mark J. Leidy
Executive Vice President, Manufacturing
Steven C. Mizell
Executive Vice President, Human Resources
Cheryl P. Morley
Senior Vice President, Corporate Strategy
Kerry J. Preete
Vice President, International Commercial
Nicole M. Ringenberg
Vice President, Finance & Operations, Global Commercial
David F. Snively
Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel
Gerald A. Steiner
Executive Vice President, Sustainability & Corporate Affairs
Some current leaders may include work experience with the "old" Monsanto Company, Pharmacia Corp. or Solutia Inc. prior to the formation of the new Monsanto, focused solely on agriculture, in 2000.
http://www.monsanto.com/who_we_are/leadership.asp
Board of Directors
(Note: Ages as of January 14, 2009)
Frank V. AtLee III, 68, is a retired president of the former American Cyanamid Company and chairman of the former Cyanamid International. Both companies were involved in the discovery, development, manufacturing and marketing of medical and agricultural products. Mr. AtLee served Monsanto as chairman of the board and chair of the Executive Committee from June 2000 to October 2003. He was Monsanto's interim president and chief executive officer from December 2002 to May 2003. He is a member of the Audit and Finance Committee and the Science and Technology Committee.
Mr. AtLee has been elected to a term that expires in 2010.
John W. Bachmann, 70, is a senior partner of Edward Jones, a major financial services firm that advises individual investors exclusively. From 1980 until 2004, Mr. Bachmann served as managing partner of Edward Jones. Mr. Bachmann was elected to the Monsanto board in May 2004 and is a member of the Audit and Finance Committee and the People and Compensation Committee. He also serves on the boards of AMR Corporation and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, where he was the chairman of the board for 2004-2005.
Mr. Bachmann has been elected to a term that expires 2011.
Janice L. Fields, 53, is executive vice president and chief operating officer of McDonald’s USA, LLC, a subsidiary of McDonald’s Corporation, the world’s leading global foodservice retailer. She served as president, McDonald’s Central Division from 2003 to 2006, and has been with McDonald’s USA for more than 30 years. Ms. Fields was elected to the Monsanto board in April 2008 and is a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Public Policy and Corporate Responsibility Committee and the Science and Technology Committee.
Ms. Fields has been elected to a term that expires in 2012.
Hugh Grant, 50, is chairman of the board, president, and chief executive officer of Monsanto. He joined the former Monsanto as a product development representative for the company's agricultural business in 1981. Since 1991, he has held a variety of management positions, most recently as executive vice president and chief operating officer. Mr. Grant chairs the Executive Committee. He also serves on the board of PPG Industries, Inc. He has lived and worked in a number of international locations including Asia and Europe, as well as the United States.
Mr. Grant has been elected to a term that expires in 2012.
Arthur H. Harper, 53, is managing partner of GenNx360 Capital Partners, a private equity firm focused on business to business companies. He served as president and chief executive officer - Equipment Services Division, General Electric Corporation from 2002 to 2005 and executive vice president - GE Capital Services, General Electric Corporation from 2001 to 2002. Mr. Harper was elected to the Monsanto board in October 2006 and is a member of the Public Policy and Corporate Responsibility Committee and the Science and Technology Committee. He also serves on the board of Gannett Co., Inc.
Mr. Harper has been elected to a term that expires in 2010.
Gwendolyn S. King, 68, is president of Podium Prose, a speakers bureau. From 1992 to her retirement in 1998, Mrs. King was senior vice president, corporate and public affairs, for PECO Energy Company, now Exelon, a diversified utility company. From 1989 through 1992, Mrs. King served as the 11th Commissioner of Social Security. Prior to her appointment, she was deputy assistant to the President and director of Intergovernmental Affairs for President Ronald Regan. Mrs. King has served as a director on the Monsanto board since February 2001. She chairs the board's Public Policy and Corporate Responsibility Committee, and she is a member of the People and Compensation Committee, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Mrs. King also serves on the boards of Lockheed Martin Corporation and Marsh and McLennan Companies Inc.
Mrs. King has been elected to a term that expires in 2010.
C. Steven McMillan, 63, is a retired chairman of the board and chief executive officer of Sara Lee Corporation, a global consumer packaged goods company whose brands include Sara Lee, Hillshire Farms, Earth Grains, Jimmy Dean, and Douwe Egberts. He has served as a director on the Monsanto board since June 2000. Mr. McMillan chairs the board's People and Compensation Committee, and he is a member of the Audit and Finance Committee and of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
Mr. McMillan has been elected to a term that expires in 2012.
William U. Parfet, 62, is chairman of the board and chief executive officer of MPI Research Inc., a preclinical toxicology research laboratory. He has served as a director on the Monsanto board since June 2000. Mr. Parfet chairs the board's Audit and Finance Committee, and he is a member of the People and Compensation Committee and the Executive Committee. He also serves on the boards of Stryker Corporation and Taubman Centers, Inc.
Mr. Parfet has been elected to a term that expires in 2011.
George H. Poste, Ph. D., D.V.M., 64, is chief executive of Health Technology Networks, a consulting group specializing in the application of genomics technologies and computing in healthcare. In February 2009, he assumed the post of Chief Scientist, Complex Adaptive Systems Initiative at Arizona State University. From May 2003 to February 2009, he was director of the Arizona Biodesign Institute at Arizona State University. Dr. Poste is a member of the Defense Science Board and the Health Board of the U.S. Department of Defense. He is a Fellow of the Royal Society, the Royal College of Pathologist and the UK Academy of Medicine and Distinguished Fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University. Dr. Poste is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. He has served on the Monsanto board since February 2003. Dr. Poste chairs the Science and Technology Committee and is a member of the Public Policy and Corporate Responsibility Committee. Dr. Poste also serves on the boards of Exelixis, Inc. and Orchid Cellmark Inc.
Dr. Poste has been elected to a term that expires in 2011.
Robert J. Stevens, 57, is chairman of the board, president and chief executive officer of Lockheed Martin Corporation, a firm engaged in the research, design, development, manufacture and integration of advanced-technology systems, products and services. During 2001 and 2002, he served on President George W. Bush's Commission to Examine the Future of the United States Aerospace Industry. Mr. Stevens has served as a director on the Monsanto board since August 2002. He chairs the board's Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and he is a member of the Audit and Finance Committee and of the Executive Committee. He also serves as Monsanto's presiding director.
Mr. Stevens has been elected to a term that expires in 2012.
http://www.monsanto.com/responsibility/corp_gov/directors.asp
The Multiple Ways Monsanto is Putting Normal Seeds Out of Reach
Posted by Barbara Peterson
February 5, 2009
By Linn Cohen-Cole
People say if farmers don’t want problems from Monsanto, just don’t buy their GMO seeds.
Not so simple. Where are farmers supposed to get normal seed these days? How are they supposed to avoid contamination of their fields from GM-crops? How are they supposed to stop Monsanto detectives from trespassing or Monsanto from using helicopters to fly over spying on them?
Monsanto contaminates the fields, trespasses onto the land taking samples and if they find any GMO plants growing there (or say they have), they then sue, saying they own the crop. It’s a way to make money since farmers can’t fight back and court and they settle because they have no choice.
And they have done and are doing a bucket load of things to keep farmers and everyone else from having any access at all to buying, collecting, and saving of NORMAL seeds.
1. They’ve bought up the seed companies across the Midwest.
2. They’ve written Monsanto seed laws and gotten legislators to put them through, that make cleaning, collecting and storing of seeds so onerous in terms of fees and paperwork and testing and tracking every variety and being subject to fines, that having normal seed becomes almost impossible (an NAIS approach to wiping out normal seeds). Does your state have such a seed law? Before they existed, farmers just collected the seeds and put them in sacks in the shed and used them the next year, sharing whatever they wished with friends and neighbors, selling some if they wanted. That’s been killed.
In Illinois, which has such a seed law, Madigan, the Speaker of the House, his staff is Monsanto lobbyists.
3. Monsanto is pushing anti-democracy laws (Vilsack’s brainchild, actually) that remove community’ control over their own counties so farmers and citizens can’t block the planting of GMO crops even if they can contaminate other crops. So if you don’t want a GM-crop that grows industrial chemicals or drugs or a rice growing with human DNA in it, in your area and mixing with your crops, tough luck.
Check the map of just where the Monsanto/Vilsack laws are and see if your state is still a democracy or is Monsanto’s. A farmer in Illinois told me he heard that Bush had pushed through some regulation that made this true in every state. People need to check on that.
4. For sure there are Monsanto regulations buried in the FDA right now that make a farmer’s seed cleaning equipment illegal (another way to leave nothing but GM-seeds) because it’s now considered a “source of seed contamination.” Farmer can still seed clean but the equipment now has to be certified and a farmer said it would require a million to a million and half dollar building and equipment … for EACH line of seed. Seed storage facilities are also listed (another million?) and harvesting and transport equipment. And manure. Something that can contaminate seed. Notice that chemical fertilizers and pesticides are not mentioned.
You could eat manure and be okay (a little grossed out but okay). Try that with pesticides and fertilizers. Indian farmers have. Their top choice for how to commit suicide to escape the debt they have been left in is to drink Monsanto pesticides.
5. Monsanto is picking off seed cleaners across the Midwest. In Pilot Grove, Missouri, in Indiana (Maurice Parr), and now in southern Illinois (Steve Hixon). And they are using US marshals and state troopers and county police to show up in three cars to serve the poor farmers who had used Hixon as their seed cleaner, telling them that he or their neighbors turned them in, so across that 6 county areas, no one talking to neighbors and people are living in fear and those farming communities are falling apart from the suspicion Monsanto sowed. Hixon’s office got broken into and he thinks someone put a GPS tracking device on his equipment and that’s how Monsanto found between 200-400 customers in very scattered and remote areas, and threatened them all and destroyed his business within 2 days.
So, after demanding that seed cleaners somehow be able to tell one seed from another (or be sued to kingdom come) or corrupting legislatures to put in laws about labeling of seeds that are so onerous no one can cope with them, what is Monsanto’s attitude about labeling their own stuff? You guessed it - they’re out there pushing laws against ANY labeling of their own GM-food and animals and of any exports to other countries. Why?
We know and they know why.
As Norman Braksick, the president of Asgrow Seed Co. (now owned by Monsanto) predicted in the Kansas City Star (3/7/94) seven years ago, “If you put a label on a genetically engineered food, you might as well put a skull and crossbones on it.”
And they’ve sued dairy farmers for telling the truth about their milk being rBGH-free, though rBGH is associated with an increased risk of breast, colon and prostate cancers.
I just heard that some seed dealers urge farmers to buy the seed under the seed dealer’s name, telling the farmers it helps the dealer get a discount on seed to buy a lot under their own name. Then Monsanto sues the poor farmer for buying their seed without a contract and extorts huge sums from them.
Here’s a youtube video that is worth your time. Vandana Shiva is one of the leading anti-Monsanto people in the world. In this video, she says (and this video is old), Monsanto had sued 1500 farmers whose fields had simply been contaminated by GM-crops. Listen to all the ways Monsanto goes after farmers.
Do you know the story of Gandhi in India and how the British had salt laws that taxed salt? The British claimed it as theirs. Gandhi had what was called a Salt Satyagraha, in which people were asked to break the laws and march to the sea and collect the salt without paying the British. A kind of Boston tea party, I guess.
Thousands of people marched 240 miles to the ocean where the British were waiting. As people moved forward to collect the salt, the British soldiers clubbed them but the people kept coming. The non-violent protest exposed the British behavior, which was so revolting to the world that it helped end British control in India.
Vandana Shiva has started a Seed Satyagraha - nonviolent non-cooperation around seed laws - has gotten millions of farmers to sign a pledge to break those laws.
American farmers and cattlemen might appreciate what Gandhi fought for and what Shiva is bringing back and how much it is about what we are all so angry about - loss of basic freedoms. [The highlighting is mine.]
The Seed Satyagraha is the name for the nonviolent, noncooperative movement that Dr. Shiva has organized to stand against seed monopolies. According to Dr. Shiva, the name was inspired by Gandhi’s famous walk to the Dandi Beach, where he picked up salt and said, “You can’t monopolize this which we need for life.” But it’s not just the noncooperation aspect of the movement that is influenced by Gandhi. The creative side saving seeds, trading seeds, farming without corporate dependence–without their chemicals, without their seed.
” All this is talked about in the language that Gandhi left us as a legacy. We work with three key concepts.”
” (One) Swadeshi…which means the capacity to do your own thing–produce your own food, produce your own goods….”
“(Two) Swaraj–to govern yourself. And we fight on three fronts–water, food, and seed. JalSwaraj is water independence–water freedom and water sovereignty. Anna Swaraj is food freedom, food sovereignty. And Bija Swaraj is seed freedom and seed sovereignty. Swa means self–that which rises from the self and is very, very much a deep notion of freedom.
“I believe that these concepts, which are deep, deep, deep in Indian civilization, Gandhi resurrected them to fight for freedom. They are very important for today’s world because so far what we’ve had is centralized state rule, giving way now to centralized corporate control, and we need a third alternate. That third alternate is, in part, citizens being able to tell their state, ‘This is what your function is. This is what your obligations are,’ and being able to have their states act on corporations to say, ‘This is something you cannot do.’”
” (Three) Satyagraha, non-cooperation, basically saying, ‘We will do our thing and any law that tries to say that (our freedom) is illegal… we will have to not cooperate with it. We will defend our freedoms to have access to water, access to seed, access to food, access to medicine.’”
_________________________________________________
Not On My Watch Says:
February 11, 2009 at 2:08 am
An open letter to Monsanto.
I will buy seed from whoever I want when I want. I have nothing for you to sue me over but you are welcome to spend millions trying. In fact I encourage you to spend as much money as you want suing me. Everyone of you that is threatened by this company, make them take you to court. Force the state to pay for your defense seeing as your the victim here and Monsanto has to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt.
Considering that cross pollination can cause their plant’s genes to show up in your crops without your consent perhaps you should threaten to counter sue them for contaminating an organic crop. The reasonable action by Monsanto would be to make their crops unable to reproduce so as to prevent them from invading other species.
Its high time you farmers quit acting like victims and start seeing the court rooms as your friends and not your enemies. There are plenty of ways to bring a corporation to its knees, you just have to be a little creative and not wither like a weed from every threat.
We Americans have grown soft thinking that the government will take care of us, not realizing all along that WE are the government and its our responsibility to take care of ourselves. If your government is not protecting you, travel the paths of politics and throw them out and replace them with people who do understand the meanings between right and wrong.
If you choose not to do this you are willingly allowing yourselves to be victimized and deserve what you get. Remember a corporation is legally a citizen and therefore can be held accountable to the same laws that we as humans can. No one has been holding them to that standard and they are not going to like it when we do.
Without a court order, any of the evidence that Monsanto gathers on your land is not legally able to be used in a court of law, and yet you people fear to go to court against them.
You must be willing to go to court and know your basic law well enough to know if the courts themselves are following the law and if they are not you must learn how to file effective complaints and have these criminals removed from their jobs.
Freedom has to be defended in a forceful manner or control freaks like Monsanto will run over you if you let them.
_________________________________________________
Travis Says:
February 11, 2009 at 3:09 am
My father and I were turned in to monsanto for saving seed eventhough we were not planting Roundup Ready Gmo Soybeans. We figure it was a neighbor who we had confrontations with over drainage rights to a farm. We were investigate by Pinkerington thugs who made my father sign a paper giving them access to all our buildings, farms, farm records, gov records etc.. They acted like they had concealed weapons, as if they were cops, and said, “You will sign these papers or Monsanto will sue you, you will lose and Monsanto takes pride in How Many farmers they have Bankrupted!! ” Then they laughed. Monsanto found that we were doing nothing wrong, but never sent us a specific letter saying they were sorry, But instead said, “We must make sure all farmers are playing on a level playing field and we would appreciate you business in the future.” We tried to get the names of the person or persons who falsley accused us of this misdeed so that we could sue them for defimation of character, but Monsanto refused and said that they don’t keep track of that. You cant imagine how much stress this caused us over a six month period eventhough we knew we were innocent. We were so scared that the next year we bought all Gmo seed, so that we weren’t risking losing everything. By the way we grain farmed 1800 acres. Monsanto has ruined farming and put the control in the hands of the corporations. This took place 4yrs ago. I thought I lived in a free country until this happened. Now I feel like it is Nazi Germany. I bet the person who turned us in got a free jacket or some seed. How pathetic. If you want to get your neighbors farmland or ruin his reputation, just turn him in to Monsanto. One, last thing, Monsanto has built spy facilities in every farm comunity took keep records about farmers purchases, but they disguise them as research facilities. Don’t be fooled.
__________________________________________
Barbara Peterson Says:
February 13, 2009 at 3:54 am
Traitor Seeds
Something not many know about are the Traitor seeds. Remember the Bht cotton that Indian farmers committed suicide over because they produce significantly less than advertised? These farmers could not afford all of the chemicals. The seeds were Traitor seeds. Here is a 1999 definition:
GENETIC MUTILATION: An especially disturbing feature of some of the new
patents profiled in RAFI’s report is the deliberate disabling of natural
plant functions that help to fight disease. Swiss biotech giant Novartis
is most advanced in this aspect of Traitor technology. Novartis blandly
refers to it as “inactivation of endogenous regulation” so that “genes
which are natively regulated can be regulated exclusively by the
application to the plant of a chemical regulator.”
Among the genes which Novartis can control in this manner are patented SAR
(systemic acquired resistance) genes which are critical to plant’s ability
to fight off infections from many viruses and bacteria. Thus, Novartis has
patented techniques to create plants with natural healthy functions turned
off. “The only way to turn them back on and fix these ‘damaged goods’ ”
says RAFI’s Edward Hammond, “is, well, you guessed it, the application of a
propietary chemical.”
( http://www.organicconsumers.org/Patent/rafiterm.cfm )
If enough chemicals are not applied, the genetically modified plants’ genes are not triggered and they do not grow well. You have to apply the appropriate chemicals to get them to grow. Coincidentally, the appropriate chemicals are manufactured by the same company that manufactures the seeds. This technology is even more insidious than the terminator seeds because it is being kept secret.
_________________________________________________
Corrinne Novak Says:
March 11, 2009 at 10:14 pm
What is behind all the attacks on our food supply?
We all know Monsanto does not stand alone, but it is a more prominent target than the others in the Agri-business Cartel or IPC, the International Food and Agricultural Trade Policy Council .
I found an excellent article by F. William Engdah who gives a very good explanation of how most of the nations in the world have been taken over by the Mega-Corporations. Engdah has studied trade issues since 1984. There are many others who back up his information.
http://www.publiceyeonscience.ch/images/the_wto_and_the_politics_of_gmo.doc
In the following I have paraphrased Engdah Article.
The current state of affairs in World Agriculture goes back to IPC influence in the formation of the WTO, World Trade Organization and AoA, the Agreement on Agriculture. The WTO emasculated the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) an international agreement on the safe handling and treatment of GMOs. Instead of the usual trade treaties for the first time a world organization WTO, with tough sanction and enforcement powers, was formed. More important, decision making would be secret, with no oversight. The most vital issues of economic life on the planet were to be decided behind closed doors.
Under WTO rules, countries can challenge another’s laws. The case is heard by a tribunal of three trade bureaucrats (corporate lawyers). There is no conflict of interest rules binding them, and the names of the judges are kept secret. There is no rule that the judges of WTO respect any national laws, the three judges meet in secret and all court documents are confidential and cannot be published.
The actual author of the WTO AoA was Daniel Amstutz, a former Vice President of Cargill. He was appointed by US Secretary of Agriculture Ann Veneman, Member Emeritus of IPC and a former board member of a Monsanto subsidiary. The AoA has brought misery, indebtedness and bankruptcy to millions of farmers. It has caused thousands of farmer suicides and hundreds of consumers to fall ill.
“The Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures…Aims to ensure that governments DO NOT USE QUARANTINE AND FOOD SAFETY REQUIREMENTS as Unjustified trade barriers
The Agreement to Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) forbid member countries using domestic standards or testing, food safety laws, product standards, calling them an ‘unfair barrier to trade.’
Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) introduced intellectual property rules (patents) on plants, animals and seeds. This where Monsanto gained the power to patent seed and sue farmers. WTO also removed tariffs allowing dumping of heavily subsidized EU and USA grains on third world countries, big money for the grain traders.
Who controls WTO?
Almost never does someone ask ‘who really controls the WTO?’ Yet the question is of utmost importance for the future of global food security. The powerful private interests who control WTO agriculture policy prefer to remain in the background. The IPC was created in 1987 explicitly to drive home the GATT agriculture rules of WTO. A look at the IPC membership will explain what interests it represents.
The Chairman is Robert Thompson, former Assistant Secretary US Department of Agriculture and former Presidential economic adviser.
Also included in the IPC are Bernard Auxenfans, former chairman Monsanto France; Allen Andreas of ADM/Toepfer;
Andrew Burke, Bunge (US);
Dale Hathaway former USDA official and head IFPRI (US).
Other IPC members include Heinz Imhof, chairman of Syngenta (CH)
Rob Johnson of Cargill (US) and USDA Agriculture Policy Advisory Council;
Guy Legras (France) former EU Director General Agriculture,
Rolf Moehler (Germany) former EU Director General Agriculture
. Donald Nelson of Kraft Foods (US);
Joe O’Mara of USDA,
Hiroshi Shiraiwa of Mitsui & Co Japan;
Jim Starkey former US Trade Representative Assistant;
Hans Joehr, Nestle head of agriculture;
Jerry Steiner, Monsanto (US).
And Members Emeritus include Ann Veneman, herself a board member of a Monsanto subsidiary company before she became US Secretary of Agriculture for George W. Bush in 2001.
In effect the IPC is run by agribusiness giants including Cargill, Monsanto, Bunge, ADM, the very interests which benefit from the rules they drafted for WTO trade.
http://survivingthemiddleclasscrash.wordpress.com/2009/02/05/the-multiple-ways-monsanto-is-putting-normal-seeds-out-of-reach/
February 5, 2009
By Linn Cohen-Cole
People say if farmers don’t want problems from Monsanto, just don’t buy their GMO seeds.
Not so simple. Where are farmers supposed to get normal seed these days? How are they supposed to avoid contamination of their fields from GM-crops? How are they supposed to stop Monsanto detectives from trespassing or Monsanto from using helicopters to fly over spying on them?
Monsanto contaminates the fields, trespasses onto the land taking samples and if they find any GMO plants growing there (or say they have), they then sue, saying they own the crop. It’s a way to make money since farmers can’t fight back and court and they settle because they have no choice.
And they have done and are doing a bucket load of things to keep farmers and everyone else from having any access at all to buying, collecting, and saving of NORMAL seeds.
1. They’ve bought up the seed companies across the Midwest.
2. They’ve written Monsanto seed laws and gotten legislators to put them through, that make cleaning, collecting and storing of seeds so onerous in terms of fees and paperwork and testing and tracking every variety and being subject to fines, that having normal seed becomes almost impossible (an NAIS approach to wiping out normal seeds). Does your state have such a seed law? Before they existed, farmers just collected the seeds and put them in sacks in the shed and used them the next year, sharing whatever they wished with friends and neighbors, selling some if they wanted. That’s been killed.
In Illinois, which has such a seed law, Madigan, the Speaker of the House, his staff is Monsanto lobbyists.
3. Monsanto is pushing anti-democracy laws (Vilsack’s brainchild, actually) that remove community’ control over their own counties so farmers and citizens can’t block the planting of GMO crops even if they can contaminate other crops. So if you don’t want a GM-crop that grows industrial chemicals or drugs or a rice growing with human DNA in it, in your area and mixing with your crops, tough luck.
Check the map of just where the Monsanto/Vilsack laws are and see if your state is still a democracy or is Monsanto’s. A farmer in Illinois told me he heard that Bush had pushed through some regulation that made this true in every state. People need to check on that.
4. For sure there are Monsanto regulations buried in the FDA right now that make a farmer’s seed cleaning equipment illegal (another way to leave nothing but GM-seeds) because it’s now considered a “source of seed contamination.” Farmer can still seed clean but the equipment now has to be certified and a farmer said it would require a million to a million and half dollar building and equipment … for EACH line of seed. Seed storage facilities are also listed (another million?) and harvesting and transport equipment. And manure. Something that can contaminate seed. Notice that chemical fertilizers and pesticides are not mentioned.
You could eat manure and be okay (a little grossed out but okay). Try that with pesticides and fertilizers. Indian farmers have. Their top choice for how to commit suicide to escape the debt they have been left in is to drink Monsanto pesticides.
5. Monsanto is picking off seed cleaners across the Midwest. In Pilot Grove, Missouri, in Indiana (Maurice Parr), and now in southern Illinois (Steve Hixon). And they are using US marshals and state troopers and county police to show up in three cars to serve the poor farmers who had used Hixon as their seed cleaner, telling them that he or their neighbors turned them in, so across that 6 county areas, no one talking to neighbors and people are living in fear and those farming communities are falling apart from the suspicion Monsanto sowed. Hixon’s office got broken into and he thinks someone put a GPS tracking device on his equipment and that’s how Monsanto found between 200-400 customers in very scattered and remote areas, and threatened them all and destroyed his business within 2 days.
So, after demanding that seed cleaners somehow be able to tell one seed from another (or be sued to kingdom come) or corrupting legislatures to put in laws about labeling of seeds that are so onerous no one can cope with them, what is Monsanto’s attitude about labeling their own stuff? You guessed it - they’re out there pushing laws against ANY labeling of their own GM-food and animals and of any exports to other countries. Why?
We know and they know why.
As Norman Braksick, the president of Asgrow Seed Co. (now owned by Monsanto) predicted in the Kansas City Star (3/7/94) seven years ago, “If you put a label on a genetically engineered food, you might as well put a skull and crossbones on it.”
And they’ve sued dairy farmers for telling the truth about their milk being rBGH-free, though rBGH is associated with an increased risk of breast, colon and prostate cancers.
I just heard that some seed dealers urge farmers to buy the seed under the seed dealer’s name, telling the farmers it helps the dealer get a discount on seed to buy a lot under their own name. Then Monsanto sues the poor farmer for buying their seed without a contract and extorts huge sums from them.
Here’s a youtube video that is worth your time. Vandana Shiva is one of the leading anti-Monsanto people in the world. In this video, she says (and this video is old), Monsanto had sued 1500 farmers whose fields had simply been contaminated by GM-crops. Listen to all the ways Monsanto goes after farmers.
Do you know the story of Gandhi in India and how the British had salt laws that taxed salt? The British claimed it as theirs. Gandhi had what was called a Salt Satyagraha, in which people were asked to break the laws and march to the sea and collect the salt without paying the British. A kind of Boston tea party, I guess.
Thousands of people marched 240 miles to the ocean where the British were waiting. As people moved forward to collect the salt, the British soldiers clubbed them but the people kept coming. The non-violent protest exposed the British behavior, which was so revolting to the world that it helped end British control in India.
Vandana Shiva has started a Seed Satyagraha - nonviolent non-cooperation around seed laws - has gotten millions of farmers to sign a pledge to break those laws.
American farmers and cattlemen might appreciate what Gandhi fought for and what Shiva is bringing back and how much it is about what we are all so angry about - loss of basic freedoms. [The highlighting is mine.]
The Seed Satyagraha is the name for the nonviolent, noncooperative movement that Dr. Shiva has organized to stand against seed monopolies. According to Dr. Shiva, the name was inspired by Gandhi’s famous walk to the Dandi Beach, where he picked up salt and said, “You can’t monopolize this which we need for life.” But it’s not just the noncooperation aspect of the movement that is influenced by Gandhi. The creative side saving seeds, trading seeds, farming without corporate dependence–without their chemicals, without their seed.
” All this is talked about in the language that Gandhi left us as a legacy. We work with three key concepts.”
” (One) Swadeshi…which means the capacity to do your own thing–produce your own food, produce your own goods….”
“(Two) Swaraj–to govern yourself. And we fight on three fronts–water, food, and seed. JalSwaraj is water independence–water freedom and water sovereignty. Anna Swaraj is food freedom, food sovereignty. And Bija Swaraj is seed freedom and seed sovereignty. Swa means self–that which rises from the self and is very, very much a deep notion of freedom.
“I believe that these concepts, which are deep, deep, deep in Indian civilization, Gandhi resurrected them to fight for freedom. They are very important for today’s world because so far what we’ve had is centralized state rule, giving way now to centralized corporate control, and we need a third alternate. That third alternate is, in part, citizens being able to tell their state, ‘This is what your function is. This is what your obligations are,’ and being able to have their states act on corporations to say, ‘This is something you cannot do.’”
” (Three) Satyagraha, non-cooperation, basically saying, ‘We will do our thing and any law that tries to say that (our freedom) is illegal… we will have to not cooperate with it. We will defend our freedoms to have access to water, access to seed, access to food, access to medicine.’”
_________________________________________________
Not On My Watch Says:
February 11, 2009 at 2:08 am
An open letter to Monsanto.
I will buy seed from whoever I want when I want. I have nothing for you to sue me over but you are welcome to spend millions trying. In fact I encourage you to spend as much money as you want suing me. Everyone of you that is threatened by this company, make them take you to court. Force the state to pay for your defense seeing as your the victim here and Monsanto has to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt.
Considering that cross pollination can cause their plant’s genes to show up in your crops without your consent perhaps you should threaten to counter sue them for contaminating an organic crop. The reasonable action by Monsanto would be to make their crops unable to reproduce so as to prevent them from invading other species.
Its high time you farmers quit acting like victims and start seeing the court rooms as your friends and not your enemies. There are plenty of ways to bring a corporation to its knees, you just have to be a little creative and not wither like a weed from every threat.
We Americans have grown soft thinking that the government will take care of us, not realizing all along that WE are the government and its our responsibility to take care of ourselves. If your government is not protecting you, travel the paths of politics and throw them out and replace them with people who do understand the meanings between right and wrong.
If you choose not to do this you are willingly allowing yourselves to be victimized and deserve what you get. Remember a corporation is legally a citizen and therefore can be held accountable to the same laws that we as humans can. No one has been holding them to that standard and they are not going to like it when we do.
Without a court order, any of the evidence that Monsanto gathers on your land is not legally able to be used in a court of law, and yet you people fear to go to court against them.
You must be willing to go to court and know your basic law well enough to know if the courts themselves are following the law and if they are not you must learn how to file effective complaints and have these criminals removed from their jobs.
Freedom has to be defended in a forceful manner or control freaks like Monsanto will run over you if you let them.
_________________________________________________
Travis Says:
February 11, 2009 at 3:09 am
My father and I were turned in to monsanto for saving seed eventhough we were not planting Roundup Ready Gmo Soybeans. We figure it was a neighbor who we had confrontations with over drainage rights to a farm. We were investigate by Pinkerington thugs who made my father sign a paper giving them access to all our buildings, farms, farm records, gov records etc.. They acted like they had concealed weapons, as if they were cops, and said, “You will sign these papers or Monsanto will sue you, you will lose and Monsanto takes pride in How Many farmers they have Bankrupted!! ” Then they laughed. Monsanto found that we were doing nothing wrong, but never sent us a specific letter saying they were sorry, But instead said, “We must make sure all farmers are playing on a level playing field and we would appreciate you business in the future.” We tried to get the names of the person or persons who falsley accused us of this misdeed so that we could sue them for defimation of character, but Monsanto refused and said that they don’t keep track of that. You cant imagine how much stress this caused us over a six month period eventhough we knew we were innocent. We were so scared that the next year we bought all Gmo seed, so that we weren’t risking losing everything. By the way we grain farmed 1800 acres. Monsanto has ruined farming and put the control in the hands of the corporations. This took place 4yrs ago. I thought I lived in a free country until this happened. Now I feel like it is Nazi Germany. I bet the person who turned us in got a free jacket or some seed. How pathetic. If you want to get your neighbors farmland or ruin his reputation, just turn him in to Monsanto. One, last thing, Monsanto has built spy facilities in every farm comunity took keep records about farmers purchases, but they disguise them as research facilities. Don’t be fooled.
__________________________________________
Barbara Peterson Says:
February 13, 2009 at 3:54 am
Traitor Seeds
Something not many know about are the Traitor seeds. Remember the Bht cotton that Indian farmers committed suicide over because they produce significantly less than advertised? These farmers could not afford all of the chemicals. The seeds were Traitor seeds. Here is a 1999 definition:
GENETIC MUTILATION: An especially disturbing feature of some of the new
patents profiled in RAFI’s report is the deliberate disabling of natural
plant functions that help to fight disease. Swiss biotech giant Novartis
is most advanced in this aspect of Traitor technology. Novartis blandly
refers to it as “inactivation of endogenous regulation” so that “genes
which are natively regulated can be regulated exclusively by the
application to the plant of a chemical regulator.”
Among the genes which Novartis can control in this manner are patented SAR
(systemic acquired resistance) genes which are critical to plant’s ability
to fight off infections from many viruses and bacteria. Thus, Novartis has
patented techniques to create plants with natural healthy functions turned
off. “The only way to turn them back on and fix these ‘damaged goods’ ”
says RAFI’s Edward Hammond, “is, well, you guessed it, the application of a
propietary chemical.”
( http://www.organicconsumers.org/Patent/rafiterm.cfm )
If enough chemicals are not applied, the genetically modified plants’ genes are not triggered and they do not grow well. You have to apply the appropriate chemicals to get them to grow. Coincidentally, the appropriate chemicals are manufactured by the same company that manufactures the seeds. This technology is even more insidious than the terminator seeds because it is being kept secret.
_________________________________________________
Corrinne Novak Says:
March 11, 2009 at 10:14 pm
What is behind all the attacks on our food supply?
We all know Monsanto does not stand alone, but it is a more prominent target than the others in the Agri-business Cartel or IPC, the International Food and Agricultural Trade Policy Council .
I found an excellent article by F. William Engdah who gives a very good explanation of how most of the nations in the world have been taken over by the Mega-Corporations. Engdah has studied trade issues since 1984. There are many others who back up his information.
http://www.publiceyeonscience.ch/images/the_wto_and_the_politics_of_gmo.doc
In the following I have paraphrased Engdah Article.
The current state of affairs in World Agriculture goes back to IPC influence in the formation of the WTO, World Trade Organization and AoA, the Agreement on Agriculture. The WTO emasculated the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) an international agreement on the safe handling and treatment of GMOs. Instead of the usual trade treaties for the first time a world organization WTO, with tough sanction and enforcement powers, was formed. More important, decision making would be secret, with no oversight. The most vital issues of economic life on the planet were to be decided behind closed doors.
Under WTO rules, countries can challenge another’s laws. The case is heard by a tribunal of three trade bureaucrats (corporate lawyers). There is no conflict of interest rules binding them, and the names of the judges are kept secret. There is no rule that the judges of WTO respect any national laws, the three judges meet in secret and all court documents are confidential and cannot be published.
The actual author of the WTO AoA was Daniel Amstutz, a former Vice President of Cargill. He was appointed by US Secretary of Agriculture Ann Veneman, Member Emeritus of IPC and a former board member of a Monsanto subsidiary. The AoA has brought misery, indebtedness and bankruptcy to millions of farmers. It has caused thousands of farmer suicides and hundreds of consumers to fall ill.
“The Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures…Aims to ensure that governments DO NOT USE QUARANTINE AND FOOD SAFETY REQUIREMENTS as Unjustified trade barriers
The Agreement to Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) forbid member countries using domestic standards or testing, food safety laws, product standards, calling them an ‘unfair barrier to trade.’
Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) introduced intellectual property rules (patents) on plants, animals and seeds. This where Monsanto gained the power to patent seed and sue farmers. WTO also removed tariffs allowing dumping of heavily subsidized EU and USA grains on third world countries, big money for the grain traders.
Who controls WTO?
Almost never does someone ask ‘who really controls the WTO?’ Yet the question is of utmost importance for the future of global food security. The powerful private interests who control WTO agriculture policy prefer to remain in the background. The IPC was created in 1987 explicitly to drive home the GATT agriculture rules of WTO. A look at the IPC membership will explain what interests it represents.
The Chairman is Robert Thompson, former Assistant Secretary US Department of Agriculture and former Presidential economic adviser.
Also included in the IPC are Bernard Auxenfans, former chairman Monsanto France; Allen Andreas of ADM/Toepfer;
Andrew Burke, Bunge (US);
Dale Hathaway former USDA official and head IFPRI (US).
Other IPC members include Heinz Imhof, chairman of Syngenta (CH)
Rob Johnson of Cargill (US) and USDA Agriculture Policy Advisory Council;
Guy Legras (France) former EU Director General Agriculture,
Rolf Moehler (Germany) former EU Director General Agriculture
. Donald Nelson of Kraft Foods (US);
Joe O’Mara of USDA,
Hiroshi Shiraiwa of Mitsui & Co Japan;
Jim Starkey former US Trade Representative Assistant;
Hans Joehr, Nestle head of agriculture;
Jerry Steiner, Monsanto (US).
And Members Emeritus include Ann Veneman, herself a board member of a Monsanto subsidiary company before she became US Secretary of Agriculture for George W. Bush in 2001.
In effect the IPC is run by agribusiness giants including Cargill, Monsanto, Bunge, ADM, the very interests which benefit from the rules they drafted for WTO trade.
http://survivingthemiddleclasscrash.wordpress.com/2009/02/05/the-multiple-ways-monsanto-is-putting-normal-seeds-out-of-reach/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)