Gus Lubin
November 20, 2010
If you think the airport scanner fiasco is big now, wait till Thanksgiving.
Advanced Imaging Technology People traveling in New York, Los Angeles, Chicago and other major cities will have to choose between a revealing body scan and a very thorough pat down. http://www.businessinsider.com/pictures-full-body-scanners-2010-11
Here are 68 airports with the scanners:
Albuquerque International Sunport Airport
Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport
Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport
Boston Logan International
Bush Houston Interncontinental Airport
Boise Airport
Bradley International Airport
Brownsville
Buffalo Niagara International Airport
Charlotte Douglas International
Chicago O’Hare International
Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International
Cleveland International Airport
Corpus Christie Airport
Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport
Denver International Airport
Detroit Metro Airport
Dulles International Airport
El Paso International Airport
Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International
Fort Wayne International Airport
Fresno Airport
Gulfport International Airport
Grand Rapids Airport
Harrisburg International Airport
Harlingen/Valley International Airport
Honolulu International Airport
Indianapolis International Airport
Jacksonville International Airport
John F. Kennedy International Airport
Kansas City International
LaGuardia International Airport
Lambert/St. Louis International Airport
Laredo International Airport
Lihue Airport
Los Angeles International
Luis Munoz Marin International Airport
McAllen Miller Airport
McCarran International Airport
Memphis International Airport
Miami International Airport
General Mitchell Milwaukee International Airport
Mineta San José International
Minneapolis/St.Paul International Airport
Nashville International Airport
Newark Liberty International Airport
Louis Armstrong New Orleans International Airport
Oakland International Airport
Omaha Eppley Field Airport
Orlando International Airport
Palm Beach International Airport
Philadelphia International Airport
Phoenix International Airport
Pittsburgh International Airport
Port Columbus International
Raleigh-Durham International Airport
Richmond International Airport
Rochester International Airport
Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport
Salt Lake City International Airport
San Antonio International Airport
San Diego International Airport
San Francisco International Airport
Seattle-Tacoma International Airport
Spokane International Airport
T.F. Green Airport
Tampa International Airport
Tulsa International Airport
These airports are getting them soon:
Chicago Midway International Airport
Houston William P. Hobby Airport
Saipan International Airport
http://peopleforfreedom.com/new-world-order-news/resistance/avoid-these-68-airports-if-you-dont-want-an-x-ray-body-scan/
Showing posts with label Intimidation-Techniques. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Intimidation-Techniques. Show all posts
Monday, November 22, 2010
Monday, September 20, 2010
Lady Gaga danger to mental health of her fans?
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor
September 20 2010
Lady Gaga, superstar to teens, wears dress made of animal flesh (opinion)
(NaturalNews) If you've ever wondered about the true mental sickness of the entertainment industry, look no further than Lady Gaga. She rose to fame and has become a teen favorite by pumping out tunes like "Love Game" where she belts out lines such as "Let's have some fun, this beat is sick, I wanna take a ride on your disco stick."
Seriously. This is the stuff your teenage kids are piping into their brains through their iPods, by the way.
And that's just the beginning: Lady Gaga is also largely responsible for the new craze of wearing "dilated pupil contact lenses" which make young girls appear to be either sexually aroused or stoned. These contact lenses are potentially dangerous, and they are being brought into the U.S. illegally, bypassing FDA approval. But thanks to Lady Gaga, young girls are increasingly interested in wearing them so they, too, can look "aroused and stoned" in order to arouse potential sex partners.
But there's more to this sick story: Lady Gaga was recently honored at the 2010 MTV Video Music Awards, where she received a whopping eight "moonman" awards as well as Video of the Year honors.
To accept these awards, Lady Gaga actually appeared on stage wearing a dress made out of animal flesh. Yes, she was literally draped in animal flesh. This has been reported as her "red meat dress."
"Meat is the decomposing flesh of a tormented animal who didn't want to die, and after a few hours under the TV lights, it would smell like the rotting flesh it is and likely be crawling in maggots -- not too attractive, really." says PETA on its website (http://blog.peta.org/archives/2010/...).
Is Lady Gaga a worshipper of death?
But it goes far deeper than that. Anyone who would wear a dress made out of red meat is, for starters, mentally ill. But Lady Gaga goes far beyond just mentally ill, reaching to depths of necro-worship that make her appear almost Satanic.
In an upcoming live event, she promises to be surrounded by on-stage corpses. It is being widely reported across the 'net that she plans to put dead human bodies on stage as part of her "act."
Now, for those who really know what goes on behind the scenes of the entertainment industry, this probably comes as no surprise. There has always been a bizarre element of dark energy at work at the fringes of this industry, but Lady Gaga may be taking it to a whole new depth of darkness. Here's why:
Google a woman named Lina Morgana. Lina is now dead, but she worked creatively alongside Lady Gaga until one day she mysteriously fell ten stories from a tall building and was crushed to death when she hit the pavement.
According to Lina's grieving mom, Lady Gaga stole Lina's act and rose to fame following Lina's "suicide."
An article on MyDeathSpace explains how everyone familiar with Lina was shocked to see how Lady Gaga stole her act: "It was the same style, the same look, the same music, the same voice, the same jaw line - the way they expressed themselves," said Schwab. "And I was like, 'Is that Lina?' It was so, so shocking. It was like looking at a ghost." (http://www.mydeathspace.com/article...)
Lina Morgan was only 19 when she died (www.LinaMorgana.com). The circumstances of her death and the similarity between Lady Gaga's current act (wig, stage presence, attitude, etc.) and Lina Morgan's previous act is highly suspicious, lending an element of curiosity to some of the circulating theories about her death.
Is Lady Gaga a threat to mental health?
Now, before we go any further, you might wonder what is this story doing on NaturalNews.com? It's simple: I believe Lady Gaga is a danger to the mental health of those who listen to her music.
In my opinion, her music is a mental assault filled with lewd, sexed-up lyrics that promote teen sex while avoiding any mention of all the responsibilities that should go along with such topics (birth control, parenting, safe sex, abstinence, consequences of pregnancy and so on).
Furthermore, her incessant promotion of sexual promiscuity and dilated pupil contact lenses is a threat to your children's physical health (eye infections, anyone?). And finally, Lady Gaga may actually be radiating some kind of Satanic or necro-worshipping vibe that could trigger all kinds of bizarre death-related thoughts or behavior in impressionable young teens (who for the most part, let's admit it, literally worship these entertainment "gods" such as Lady Gaga).
Now, frankly ignored Lady Gaga's desperate attention-grabbing act up until the point where she wore her red meat dress made out of animal flesh. To actually drape dead animal flesh over your body and wear it on stage is almost a public admission that you're either mentally deranged or some sort of worshipper of death (perhaps both).
Taking all this with a grain of salt, it's true there is a lot of bizarre and untrue gossip about celebrities on the 'net. Everyone I know who is even semi-famous has been subjected to utterly false accusations at one point or another. But Lady Gaga is proving her critics right through her own behavior. Her agenda is blatantly obvious as she now flaunts it on stage, almost as if to say, "I dare you to catch on to what I'm doing."
What she's doing, it turns out, is infecting the minds of our youth with truly dangerous ideas about sex and seduction while wrapping these ideas (and herself, literally) in flagrant necro-worship. It would be no surprise, after all, if Lady Gaga actually featured herself on stage having sex with a propped up erection from a corpse. That's precisely the kind of thing she might conceivably do because it combines her two favorite messages: Sex and death. (It would also keep the tabloids talking for weeks...)
That's why I urge all NaturalNews readers to ban Lady Gaga material from your household if you haven't already. Her music and lyrics are, in my opinion, extremely destabilizing to the mental and physical health of children and teens. If your teens are listening to this stuff, they may be headed down a dangerous path requiring some intervention on your part.
Teens, almost by definition, have not yet developed the mental capacity to make wise decisions in their own long-term interests. They are short-term thinkers, almost to a fault, and most of them have virtually no ability to understand how and when they are being influenced. They worship singers like Lady Gaga while having no clue about the ways their minds are being warped through her lyrics and videos. (They also wear Nike shoes, designer jeans and Axe cologne, having no clue that virtually all their product consumption decisions have been spoon fed to them by carefully engineered, corporate-sponsored behavioral influence campaigns. But that's another story...)
This is why it is up to parents to protect their children from these deranged pop stars and their dangerous messages. Mind you, I'm not against music (in fact, I strongly support musical expression and freedom of speech, and I happen to be a musician myself), and I've never spoken out against any music artist in the past. But as I see it, Lady Gaga crosses the line from artistry to insanity, perhaps even delving into Satanic witchcraft or some other dark rendition of psychosis. To allow our children to worship her as a music goddess is to expose them to a highly destabilizing belief system that can only lead them down a dark path of self destruction.
Actions you can take as parents
#1) Know what your children and teens are watching and listening to.
#2) Ban Lady Gaga music and videos from your household.
#3) Ban Lady Gaga material from the portable devices your children may own (iPhones, iPads, iPods, etc.).
#4) Do not financially support the Lady Gaga profiteers. Don't allow your children to buy music, concert tickets, T-shirts or any other items that financially benefit Lady Gaga and her marketing minions.
#5) Talk to your teens about sex from a responsible parenting point of view. Explain the long-term effects of an unwanted pregnancy and teach either safe sex or abstinence, depending on your own philosophical or religious beliefs.
#6) Consider home schooling for your kids because it may help protect them from the destructive influences of mainstream school kids who are, by and large, Lady Gaga worshippers. (Home schooling isn't for everyone, but it's increasingly working for lots of families.)
Remember, you must make a real effort to counter the messages being imprinted on the minds of your children by the entertainment industry. Music is a powerful carrier of unconscious information, and that's exactly why I've turned to music to help educate people about the dangers of vaccines, for example.
There are positive uses of music, but Lady Gaga unfortunately uses music to negatively influence the minds of children and teens, turning them towards sexual deviancy and the worship of dead flesh or dead bodies. In my opinion, Lady Gaga suffers some kind of genuine mental sickness that should be kept as far away from our children as possible.
http://www.naturalnews.com/029788_Lady_Gaga_mental_health.html
September 20 2010
Lady Gaga, superstar to teens, wears dress made of animal flesh (opinion)
(NaturalNews) If you've ever wondered about the true mental sickness of the entertainment industry, look no further than Lady Gaga. She rose to fame and has become a teen favorite by pumping out tunes like "Love Game" where she belts out lines such as "Let's have some fun, this beat is sick, I wanna take a ride on your disco stick."
Seriously. This is the stuff your teenage kids are piping into their brains through their iPods, by the way.
And that's just the beginning: Lady Gaga is also largely responsible for the new craze of wearing "dilated pupil contact lenses" which make young girls appear to be either sexually aroused or stoned. These contact lenses are potentially dangerous, and they are being brought into the U.S. illegally, bypassing FDA approval. But thanks to Lady Gaga, young girls are increasingly interested in wearing them so they, too, can look "aroused and stoned" in order to arouse potential sex partners.
But there's more to this sick story: Lady Gaga was recently honored at the 2010 MTV Video Music Awards, where she received a whopping eight "moonman" awards as well as Video of the Year honors.
To accept these awards, Lady Gaga actually appeared on stage wearing a dress made out of animal flesh. Yes, she was literally draped in animal flesh. This has been reported as her "red meat dress."
"Meat is the decomposing flesh of a tormented animal who didn't want to die, and after a few hours under the TV lights, it would smell like the rotting flesh it is and likely be crawling in maggots -- not too attractive, really." says PETA on its website (http://blog.peta.org/archives/2010/...).
Is Lady Gaga a worshipper of death?
But it goes far deeper than that. Anyone who would wear a dress made out of red meat is, for starters, mentally ill. But Lady Gaga goes far beyond just mentally ill, reaching to depths of necro-worship that make her appear almost Satanic.
In an upcoming live event, she promises to be surrounded by on-stage corpses. It is being widely reported across the 'net that she plans to put dead human bodies on stage as part of her "act."
Now, for those who really know what goes on behind the scenes of the entertainment industry, this probably comes as no surprise. There has always been a bizarre element of dark energy at work at the fringes of this industry, but Lady Gaga may be taking it to a whole new depth of darkness. Here's why:
Google a woman named Lina Morgana. Lina is now dead, but she worked creatively alongside Lady Gaga until one day she mysteriously fell ten stories from a tall building and was crushed to death when she hit the pavement.
According to Lina's grieving mom, Lady Gaga stole Lina's act and rose to fame following Lina's "suicide."
An article on MyDeathSpace explains how everyone familiar with Lina was shocked to see how Lady Gaga stole her act: "It was the same style, the same look, the same music, the same voice, the same jaw line - the way they expressed themselves," said Schwab. "And I was like, 'Is that Lina?' It was so, so shocking. It was like looking at a ghost." (http://www.mydeathspace.com/article...)
Lina Morgan was only 19 when she died (www.LinaMorgana.com). The circumstances of her death and the similarity between Lady Gaga's current act (wig, stage presence, attitude, etc.) and Lina Morgan's previous act is highly suspicious, lending an element of curiosity to some of the circulating theories about her death.
Is Lady Gaga a threat to mental health?
Now, before we go any further, you might wonder what is this story doing on NaturalNews.com? It's simple: I believe Lady Gaga is a danger to the mental health of those who listen to her music.
In my opinion, her music is a mental assault filled with lewd, sexed-up lyrics that promote teen sex while avoiding any mention of all the responsibilities that should go along with such topics (birth control, parenting, safe sex, abstinence, consequences of pregnancy and so on).
Furthermore, her incessant promotion of sexual promiscuity and dilated pupil contact lenses is a threat to your children's physical health (eye infections, anyone?). And finally, Lady Gaga may actually be radiating some kind of Satanic or necro-worshipping vibe that could trigger all kinds of bizarre death-related thoughts or behavior in impressionable young teens (who for the most part, let's admit it, literally worship these entertainment "gods" such as Lady Gaga).
Now, frankly ignored Lady Gaga's desperate attention-grabbing act up until the point where she wore her red meat dress made out of animal flesh. To actually drape dead animal flesh over your body and wear it on stage is almost a public admission that you're either mentally deranged or some sort of worshipper of death (perhaps both).
Taking all this with a grain of salt, it's true there is a lot of bizarre and untrue gossip about celebrities on the 'net. Everyone I know who is even semi-famous has been subjected to utterly false accusations at one point or another. But Lady Gaga is proving her critics right through her own behavior. Her agenda is blatantly obvious as she now flaunts it on stage, almost as if to say, "I dare you to catch on to what I'm doing."
What she's doing, it turns out, is infecting the minds of our youth with truly dangerous ideas about sex and seduction while wrapping these ideas (and herself, literally) in flagrant necro-worship. It would be no surprise, after all, if Lady Gaga actually featured herself on stage having sex with a propped up erection from a corpse. That's precisely the kind of thing she might conceivably do because it combines her two favorite messages: Sex and death. (It would also keep the tabloids talking for weeks...)
That's why I urge all NaturalNews readers to ban Lady Gaga material from your household if you haven't already. Her music and lyrics are, in my opinion, extremely destabilizing to the mental and physical health of children and teens. If your teens are listening to this stuff, they may be headed down a dangerous path requiring some intervention on your part.
Teens, almost by definition, have not yet developed the mental capacity to make wise decisions in their own long-term interests. They are short-term thinkers, almost to a fault, and most of them have virtually no ability to understand how and when they are being influenced. They worship singers like Lady Gaga while having no clue about the ways their minds are being warped through her lyrics and videos. (They also wear Nike shoes, designer jeans and Axe cologne, having no clue that virtually all their product consumption decisions have been spoon fed to them by carefully engineered, corporate-sponsored behavioral influence campaigns. But that's another story...)
This is why it is up to parents to protect their children from these deranged pop stars and their dangerous messages. Mind you, I'm not against music (in fact, I strongly support musical expression and freedom of speech, and I happen to be a musician myself), and I've never spoken out against any music artist in the past. But as I see it, Lady Gaga crosses the line from artistry to insanity, perhaps even delving into Satanic witchcraft or some other dark rendition of psychosis. To allow our children to worship her as a music goddess is to expose them to a highly destabilizing belief system that can only lead them down a dark path of self destruction.
Actions you can take as parents
#1) Know what your children and teens are watching and listening to.
#2) Ban Lady Gaga music and videos from your household.
#3) Ban Lady Gaga material from the portable devices your children may own (iPhones, iPads, iPods, etc.).
#4) Do not financially support the Lady Gaga profiteers. Don't allow your children to buy music, concert tickets, T-shirts or any other items that financially benefit Lady Gaga and her marketing minions.
#5) Talk to your teens about sex from a responsible parenting point of view. Explain the long-term effects of an unwanted pregnancy and teach either safe sex or abstinence, depending on your own philosophical or religious beliefs.
#6) Consider home schooling for your kids because it may help protect them from the destructive influences of mainstream school kids who are, by and large, Lady Gaga worshippers. (Home schooling isn't for everyone, but it's increasingly working for lots of families.)
Remember, you must make a real effort to counter the messages being imprinted on the minds of your children by the entertainment industry. Music is a powerful carrier of unconscious information, and that's exactly why I've turned to music to help educate people about the dangers of vaccines, for example.
There are positive uses of music, but Lady Gaga unfortunately uses music to negatively influence the minds of children and teens, turning them towards sexual deviancy and the worship of dead flesh or dead bodies. In my opinion, Lady Gaga suffers some kind of genuine mental sickness that should be kept as far away from our children as possible.
http://www.naturalnews.com/029788_Lady_Gaga_mental_health.html
Elvis and MKULTRA mind control
August1977 | March 18, 2009
More about Elvis's search for God and the connection to his health problems and other oddities that may reveal a bizarre pattern.
Elvis and MKULTRA mind control by LisaMarie-Truth888
More about Elvis's search for God and the connection to his health problems and other oddities that may reveal a bizarre pattern.
Elvis and MKULTRA mind control by LisaMarie-Truth888
Saturday, July 3, 2010
First Amendment suspended in the Gulf of Mexico as spill cover-up goes Orwellian
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor
July 3 2010
First Amendment suspended in the Gulf of Mexico as spill cover-up goes Orwellian
(NaturalNews) As CNN is now reporting, the U.S. government has issued a new rule that would make it a felony crime for any journalist, reporter, blogger or photographer to approach any oil cleanup operation, equipment or vessel in the Gulf of Mexico. Anyone caught is subject to arrest, a $40,000 fine and prosecution for a federal felony crime.
CNN reporter Anderson Cooper says, "A new law passed today, and back by the force of law and the threat of fines and felony charges, ... will prevent reporters and photographers from getting anywhere close to booms and oil-soaked wildlife just about any place we need to be. By now you're probably familiar with cleanup crews stiff-arming the media, private security blocking cameras, ordinary workers clamming up, some not even saying who they're working for because they're afraid of losing their jobs."
Watch the video clip yourself at NaturalNews.TV: http://naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=203
The rule, of course, is designed to restrict the media's access to cleanup operations in order to keep images of oil-covered seabirds off the nation's televisions. With this, the Gulf Coast cleanup operation has now entered a weird Orwellian reality where the news is shaped, censored and controlled by the government in order to prevent the public from learning the truth about what's really happening in the Gulf.
The war is on to control your mind
If all this sounds familiar, it's because the U.S. government uses this same tactic during every war. The first casualty of war, as they say, is the truth. There are lots of war images the government doesn't want you to see (like military helicopter pilots shooting up Reuters photographers while screaming "Yee-Haw!" over the comm radios), and there are other images they do want you to see ("surgical strike" explosions from "smart" bombs, which makes it seem like the military is doing something useful). So war reporting is carefully monopolized by the government to deliver precisely the images they want you to see while censoring everything else.
Now the same Big Brother approach is being used in the Gulf of Mexico: Criminalize journalists, censor the story and try to keep the American people ignorant of what's really happening. It's just the latest tactic from a government that no longer even recognizes the U.S. Constitution or its Bill of Rights. Because the very first right is Freedom of Speech, which absolutely includes the right to walk onto a public beach and take photographs of something happening out in the open, on public waters. It is one of the most basic rights of our citizens and our press.
But now the Obama administration has stripped away those rights, transforming journalists into criminals. Now, we might expect something like this from Chavez, or Castro or even the communist leaders of China, but here in the United States, we've all been promised we lived in "the land of the free." Obama apparently does not subscribe to that philosophy anymore (if he ever did).
So how does criminalizing journalists equate to "land of the free?" It doesn't, obviously. Forget freedom. (Your government already has.) This is about controlling your mind to make sure you don't visually see the truth of what the oil industry has done to your oceans, your shorelines and your beaches. This is all about keeping you ignorant with a total media blackout of the real story of what's happening in the Gulf.
The real story, you see, is just too ugly. And the government has fracked up the cleanup effort to such a ridiculous extent that instead of the "transparency" they once promised, they're now resorting to the threat of arrest for all journalists who try to get close enough to cover the story.
Yes, this is happening right now in America. This isn't a hoax. I know, it sounds more like something you might hear about in Saudi Arabia, or Venezuela or some other nation run by dictators. But now it's happening right here in the USA.
As Anderson Cooper reported on CNN:
"Now the government is getting in on the act. Despite what Admiral Thad Allen promised about transparency just nearly a month ago.
Thad Allen: "The media will have uninhibited access anywhere we're doing operations..."
Anderson Cooper: The Coast Guard today announced new rules keeping photographers, reporters and anyone else from coming with 65 feet of any response vessel or booms out on the water or on beaches. What this means is that oil-soaked birds on an island surrounded by a boom, you can't get close enough to take that picture. Shot of oil on beaches with booms? Stay 65 feet away. Pictures of oil-soaked booms uselessly laying in the water because they haven't been collected like they should? You can't get close enough to see that. Believe me, that is out there. But you only know that if you get close to it, and now you can't without permission. Violators could face a fine of $40,000 and Class D felony charges."
See the video yourself at: http://naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=203
Welcome to the (censored) club
All I can say to CNN is: Welcome to the club! This kind of censorship, intimidation and tyranny has been going on for decades in the field of health, where the Orwellian FDA has treated the entire U.S. public to a nationwide blackout on truthful health information about healing foods and nutritional supplements. CNN has never covered that story, by the way. Most of the mainstream media has, in fact, gone right along with censorship of truthful health information by the FDA and FTC.
Now they're suddenly crying wolf. But where was the media when the FDA was raiding nutritional supplement companies and arresting people who dared to sell healing foods with honest descriptions about how they might help protect your health? The media went right along with the cover-up and never bothered to even tell its viewers a cover-up was taking place.
You see, even CNN is willing to tolerate some Orwellian censorship, as long as its advertisers are okay with it. The only reason they're talking about censorship in the Gulf of Mexico right now is because oil companies don't influence enough of their advertising budget to yank the story.
Censorship is not okay in a free society
I like the fact that CNN is finding the courage to speak up now about this censorship in the Gulf, but I wish they wouldn't stay silent on the other media blackouts in which they have long participated. Media censorship is bad for any nation, and it should be challenged regardless of the topic at hand. When the media is not allowed to report the truth on a subject -- any subject! -- the nation suffers some loss as a result.
Without the light of media scrutiny, corporations and government will get away with unimaginable crimes against both humanity and nature. That's what's happening right now in the Gulf of Mexico: A crime against nature.
Obama doesn't want you to see that crime. He's covering it up to the benefit of BP. He's keeping you in the dark by threatening reporters and photographers with arrest. How's that for "total transparency?"
The only thing transparent here is that President Barack Obama has violated his own oath of office by refusing to defend the Constitution. By any honest measure, in fact, these actions, which are endorsed by the White House, stand in direct violation of the U.S. Constitution. And that means this new censorship rule in the Gulf, which suspends the First Amendment, is unconstitutional. It also means those who decided on this rule are enemies of freedom.
They are the ones who should be arrested and hauled off to federal prison, not the CNN reporters who are trying to cover this story.
The seeds of tyranny
The loss of life in the Gulf of Mexico isn't the only catastrophe taking place here, you see: Now we're losing our freedoms while our government tries to intentionally blind us all from the truth of what's happening on our own public beaches.
When those who seek truth are branded criminals by the government, it is only a matter of time before that government expands its criminalization labeling to include anyone who disagrees with it. These are the seeds of tyranny, and Obama is planting them at your doorstep right now.
What BP did to the Gulf Coast, Obama is now doing to your freedom
http://www.naturalnews.com/029130_Gulf_of_Mexico_censorship.html
July 3 2010
First Amendment suspended in the Gulf of Mexico as spill cover-up goes Orwellian
(NaturalNews) As CNN is now reporting, the U.S. government has issued a new rule that would make it a felony crime for any journalist, reporter, blogger or photographer to approach any oil cleanup operation, equipment or vessel in the Gulf of Mexico. Anyone caught is subject to arrest, a $40,000 fine and prosecution for a federal felony crime.
CNN reporter Anderson Cooper says, "A new law passed today, and back by the force of law and the threat of fines and felony charges, ... will prevent reporters and photographers from getting anywhere close to booms and oil-soaked wildlife just about any place we need to be. By now you're probably familiar with cleanup crews stiff-arming the media, private security blocking cameras, ordinary workers clamming up, some not even saying who they're working for because they're afraid of losing their jobs."
Watch the video clip yourself at NaturalNews.TV: http://naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=203
The rule, of course, is designed to restrict the media's access to cleanup operations in order to keep images of oil-covered seabirds off the nation's televisions. With this, the Gulf Coast cleanup operation has now entered a weird Orwellian reality where the news is shaped, censored and controlled by the government in order to prevent the public from learning the truth about what's really happening in the Gulf.
The war is on to control your mind
If all this sounds familiar, it's because the U.S. government uses this same tactic during every war. The first casualty of war, as they say, is the truth. There are lots of war images the government doesn't want you to see (like military helicopter pilots shooting up Reuters photographers while screaming "Yee-Haw!" over the comm radios), and there are other images they do want you to see ("surgical strike" explosions from "smart" bombs, which makes it seem like the military is doing something useful). So war reporting is carefully monopolized by the government to deliver precisely the images they want you to see while censoring everything else.
Now the same Big Brother approach is being used in the Gulf of Mexico: Criminalize journalists, censor the story and try to keep the American people ignorant of what's really happening. It's just the latest tactic from a government that no longer even recognizes the U.S. Constitution or its Bill of Rights. Because the very first right is Freedom of Speech, which absolutely includes the right to walk onto a public beach and take photographs of something happening out in the open, on public waters. It is one of the most basic rights of our citizens and our press.
But now the Obama administration has stripped away those rights, transforming journalists into criminals. Now, we might expect something like this from Chavez, or Castro or even the communist leaders of China, but here in the United States, we've all been promised we lived in "the land of the free." Obama apparently does not subscribe to that philosophy anymore (if he ever did).
So how does criminalizing journalists equate to "land of the free?" It doesn't, obviously. Forget freedom. (Your government already has.) This is about controlling your mind to make sure you don't visually see the truth of what the oil industry has done to your oceans, your shorelines and your beaches. This is all about keeping you ignorant with a total media blackout of the real story of what's happening in the Gulf.
The real story, you see, is just too ugly. And the government has fracked up the cleanup effort to such a ridiculous extent that instead of the "transparency" they once promised, they're now resorting to the threat of arrest for all journalists who try to get close enough to cover the story.
Yes, this is happening right now in America. This isn't a hoax. I know, it sounds more like something you might hear about in Saudi Arabia, or Venezuela or some other nation run by dictators. But now it's happening right here in the USA.
As Anderson Cooper reported on CNN:
"Now the government is getting in on the act. Despite what Admiral Thad Allen promised about transparency just nearly a month ago.
Thad Allen: "The media will have uninhibited access anywhere we're doing operations..."
Anderson Cooper: The Coast Guard today announced new rules keeping photographers, reporters and anyone else from coming with 65 feet of any response vessel or booms out on the water or on beaches. What this means is that oil-soaked birds on an island surrounded by a boom, you can't get close enough to take that picture. Shot of oil on beaches with booms? Stay 65 feet away. Pictures of oil-soaked booms uselessly laying in the water because they haven't been collected like they should? You can't get close enough to see that. Believe me, that is out there. But you only know that if you get close to it, and now you can't without permission. Violators could face a fine of $40,000 and Class D felony charges."
See the video yourself at: http://naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=203
Welcome to the (censored) club
All I can say to CNN is: Welcome to the club! This kind of censorship, intimidation and tyranny has been going on for decades in the field of health, where the Orwellian FDA has treated the entire U.S. public to a nationwide blackout on truthful health information about healing foods and nutritional supplements. CNN has never covered that story, by the way. Most of the mainstream media has, in fact, gone right along with censorship of truthful health information by the FDA and FTC.
Now they're suddenly crying wolf. But where was the media when the FDA was raiding nutritional supplement companies and arresting people who dared to sell healing foods with honest descriptions about how they might help protect your health? The media went right along with the cover-up and never bothered to even tell its viewers a cover-up was taking place.
You see, even CNN is willing to tolerate some Orwellian censorship, as long as its advertisers are okay with it. The only reason they're talking about censorship in the Gulf of Mexico right now is because oil companies don't influence enough of their advertising budget to yank the story.
Censorship is not okay in a free society
I like the fact that CNN is finding the courage to speak up now about this censorship in the Gulf, but I wish they wouldn't stay silent on the other media blackouts in which they have long participated. Media censorship is bad for any nation, and it should be challenged regardless of the topic at hand. When the media is not allowed to report the truth on a subject -- any subject! -- the nation suffers some loss as a result.
Without the light of media scrutiny, corporations and government will get away with unimaginable crimes against both humanity and nature. That's what's happening right now in the Gulf of Mexico: A crime against nature.
Obama doesn't want you to see that crime. He's covering it up to the benefit of BP. He's keeping you in the dark by threatening reporters and photographers with arrest. How's that for "total transparency?"
The only thing transparent here is that President Barack Obama has violated his own oath of office by refusing to defend the Constitution. By any honest measure, in fact, these actions, which are endorsed by the White House, stand in direct violation of the U.S. Constitution. And that means this new censorship rule in the Gulf, which suspends the First Amendment, is unconstitutional. It also means those who decided on this rule are enemies of freedom.
They are the ones who should be arrested and hauled off to federal prison, not the CNN reporters who are trying to cover this story.
The seeds of tyranny
The loss of life in the Gulf of Mexico isn't the only catastrophe taking place here, you see: Now we're losing our freedoms while our government tries to intentionally blind us all from the truth of what's happening on our own public beaches.
When those who seek truth are branded criminals by the government, it is only a matter of time before that government expands its criminalization labeling to include anyone who disagrees with it. These are the seeds of tyranny, and Obama is planting them at your doorstep right now.
What BP did to the Gulf Coast, Obama is now doing to your freedom
http://www.naturalnews.com/029130_Gulf_of_Mexico_censorship.html
Friday, December 11, 2009
Let's get Evelyn back home!
http://www.youtube.com/user/ohwidow
December 04, 2009
Dec 3rd, 09 pre-trial hearing resulted in intermediate guardian appointed - Eve reaction of hearing intermediate guardian appointed (she is at nursing home). A prideful Christian lady, even when she is so upset, she is dignified. She clearly does not consent - she needs no boss or guardian. AND she has all her wits about her.
it is just that, a power play...she owns her home & has a small savings (about the size of a price of a car) but the gov. can get funds for all they 'put on their lists' of wards. COUGH COUGH, she sure doesn't need this.
APS & the gang have made this too, about the caregiver of 15 yrs. No one has anything to hide, details coming in a bit. The lies told, the innuendos are unbelievable. If Eve wanted to live anywhere, with anyone who she considered a great caregiver, let her!
See prior video anquish
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwZuieI8t8M
We can ALL help by going to this website and JOINING
http://www.countygrandjury.org
Her next (and last) hearing is Jan. 7th, we need to act now. Please email the webmaster above to ask if any questions. The people are the ones who have the power, and lawfully joining the grand jury is the lawful way to use it, and get Evelyn back home.
We have been getting letters of support, if you wish to offer words of encourgement or ideas, etc. please mail to:
Evelyn S. C/O Dean Marinpietri
PO Box 24524
Mayfield Heights, Ohio 44124
However, REALLY NEED PEOPLE TO JOIN THE COUNTY GRAND JURY. SEE AND JOIN AT
http://www.countygrandjury.org
Court sent finding to Evelyn Schwartz, let's contact Sheriff
http://www.youtube.com/user/ohwidow
December 10, 2009
Do you think there are CRIMINALS IN THIS CASE?
MAYFIELD HEIGHTS HAS A P/OFFICER WHO FALSIFIES A POLICE REPORT, APS FAILS TO PROTECT/INVESTIGATE, LET'S WRITE THE SHERIFF!
Cuyahoga County Sheriff's Office
SHERIFF BOB REID
1215 West 3rd Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113
http://sheriff.cuyahogacounty.us/
Their email is at the bottom of the front page.
"To investigate crooked acts upon Ms. Schwartz"
12/20 The court sent the findings of the 12/3 hearing to Evelyn, yet this mail was sent to her home. The court knew Eve was in a nursing home, because they order her there - mailing the notice to her home was intentional maybe?
We all feel that Evelyn should see this in writing, so she is aware this isn't just rumored to have happened. Linda takes it to the nursing home and videos her reading it, while Linda is going over some of the details.
We feel this saga unraveling before everyone's eyes, is important to outline and believe these five videos at least, do it very well. 1st, Eve not consenting and no jurisdiction, 2nd VIP Eve hearing they have court ordered her to be removed by force if needed (and three cops had walked down her driveway with a big sledge hammer in hand, to do so. (However, the neighbor had called Dean - over a hour away at the time - to report this, I then called the sheriff's dept. and told them to call Mayfield Heights police dept and tell them to stop. Eve was not there, she was not at her home, but at mine with Linda. After 20 minutes the M/F cop calls me back, first thing out of his mouth; "We tried to call to see if Evelyn was there." I told him that's not true, I had the phone forwarded to mine. Found out they broke in anyway. The third video is VIP as it details Eve's convening her court, giving her support team their 'marching orders".
This fourth video is important because it details Eve's reaction, disbelief and anger at how the courts could rob her of her liberties. It came with a price...Linda was kicked out of the nursing home when someone alerted staff she was videoing Evelyn. Then the next day when she went in the A.M. to visit, when a nurse asked who she was, and Linda told her..the nurse turned and RAN down the hall to alert others. Linda was detained, there were cops called, and in all 10 people in the room grilling Linda.
Two policemen, the detective, the Chief of police, staff from the nursing home. Asking all kind of questions that were unrelated to the video incident, more about personal things, Betty and Dean. How these videos up on the INTERNET were doing more harm than good for Eve, that this is making things much worse for Evelyn. Now, not only are Betty and Dean isolated from Evelyn, they add Linda. Not any concern for Evelyn, not true for 'protection' of her as they say. It is all about protection of themselves and these dealings they are handing out to Evelyn and people like her.
We are asking your help. First, please go to the website at
http://www.countygrandjury.org
this is the best way to assure that Evelyn will win - that all concerned win. It is using the lawful ways set up for Americans to stop government over-reaching. No 'sitting' anywhere, all is done by phone and email. Please, first, do that right now.
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
“I don't consent!” Says Evelyn 93-Being Stripped of Her Freedom
93-year old Evelyn Schwartz says, “I do not consent.” while Cuyahoga County Adult Protective Services tries to take her freedom and her home
Submitted by savcash on October 18, 2009 - 2:24am.
Evelyn is fighting for her liberty against Adult Protective Services (APS). She did not ask for this unwarranted intrusion into her life. In fact she refused them.
Her physician of 29-years confirms that Evelyn, despite her age, is competent and does not need a guardian or protective care. APS is determined, in the face of no supporting evidence of their claims, to move forward to take control over Evelyn’s person and estate. If APS is successful Evelyn will be taken out of the comfort and security of her home that costs her practically nothing to be placed forcefully in an adult care facility consisting of one small room that will cost between $3000 and $7,000 monthly and give the guardian a plausible excuse to ravage her life savings and sell her home to pay for. This is what Evelyn does not consent to.
For the past 15-years, Evelyn has had a live-in caregiver who she has been pleased with for nearly 15 years. Evelyn will be the first to tell you that she enjoys excellent care and Dean’s home cooking all these years which has contributed to her good health that is confirmed by her physician. Years ago, Evelyn put into place a Living Will with an Executrix and Power of Attorney to administer her remaining affairs upon her death. Several friends who care about her and for her surround Evelyn. Evidenced by this notice.
Problems with APS began almost one-year ago when Evelyn’s care-giver suffered a heart attack. Between a couple of Mayfield police officers, a social worker and a governmental system Evelyn found herself caught up “in the system” with a myriad of APS staffers intruding into her life and going so far as to have her made a ward of the court in a hearing fraught with lies, misstatements and innuendos. Evelyn has terminated this attorney who was not protecting Evelyn, but in fact, was swiftly ushering Evelyn through the system – on her way to being placed into an assisted-living facility under the care custody and control of the state and against her will.
A court case is still pending. Evelyn and friends hope that media will bring attention to Evelyn’s plight and the untruthful, over-stepping by Adult Protective Services. The Internet shows that similar situations are happening to the elderly homeowners across the United States. Evelyn Needs your help now. Shine a bright light on this one.
http://realneo.us/content/93-year-old-evelyn-schwartz-says-%E2%80%9Ci-do-not-consent%E2%80%9D-while-cuyahoga-county-adult-protective-s
. . . . . . . . .
“I don't consent!” Says Evelyn when faced w/ assault by Cuyahoga County Adult protection Agency
At 93 years old, this gracious private prideful Christian woman does not need to fight these battles, to read she's an alleged incompetent, & to stress her out if indeed, these appointments, court ordered, may possibly ruin her life as she knows it.
Sep 30, 2009 – Evelyn Schwartz was born in 1916, became widowed 39 years ago, having had no children. She was a secretary to the Dean of a local Mayfield Ohio college,
When she became somewhat arthritic, she started using a walker and was unable to drive, among other things. She made life easier by enlisting a trusted male friend, Dean to assist her. She chooses to call him her Nephew (for appearances sake), as he was a number of yrs younger than her. Her brother had passed away years ago, and this arrangement of Dean living in and being her caregiver has worked well for nearly 15 years. The one overriding concern Evelyn has is that she stays in her own home until her death. She elicited Deans promise to assist in that wish.
Forward to Nov 2008: Dean had a heart attack and was in the hospital undergoing a bypass. Dean’s girl friend, a health care person, was caring for Evelyn until he returned a few days later. Evelyn had a sour stomach and was throwing up flem and the caregiver had called the doctor who suggested she get Evelyn some Pedilite, which she left to go get it . In the mean time, a sister in law came over and was insisting Evelyn go to an old folks home where she could get full time care. Evelyn refused but the sister in law persisted. Evelyn asked Dean (when he called home to see how Evelyn was) to ask this sister-in-law to quit, which he did when Evelyn handed the phone over to her. Uhlir refused (hung up on him) and so Dean called the police from the hospital to have her removed. Dean also called another friend, Betty Brown, to go over to the house and help care for Evelyn, which she did.
Upon arriving at the house, Brown found the police there talking with Uhlir and Evelyn. We believe Uhlir had convinced the cops that Dean was swindling Evelyn. The police were engaged in asking Evelyn over and over again to go to the hospital. to which Evelyn refused each time. The cop called EMS & they were obviously going to take Evelyn out of her house w/out her consent -a dozen times saying NO. Betty tried to have Evelyn tell the police, thank you but no thank you and was wrongly arrested for her trouble. (Mayfield certified audio of this event)
Present day:
Evelyn is fighting for her life against Adult Protective Services (APS) and gang. She is being attacked from every which way. Evelyn didn’t welcome any intrusion into her life. Evelyn had a team of friends around her. She had appointed a Power of Atty to act for her upon her death or if/when she became unable to speak for herself, she had a will, a health directive paperwork, and all of that. Yet the APS wanted to investigate to be sure they said, she was being properly taken care of and no one was exploiting her or causing her harm. When she permitted the APS (against her better judgment, but to make them go away) to come into her home, go thru her bank accounts, paperwork, have nurse exam her, and check out her house and cleanliness, living condition, even checking into the cupboards and icebox for food, she thought that would be the end of it – because all checked out fine. Thereafter Evelyn said no to further interference from APS. It was too stressful and she didn’t consent to this invasive unwanted and unneeded involvement.
Evelyn goes to her trusted doctor of 29 years, and he writes up a notice that he had just completed a SEE min-exam upon Evelyn and she did fine,. She gives this glowing report to APS, they had found nothing else wrong at the house, with the banking and money concerns, so end of story, right?. …NOT!.. A few months went by and everyone thought all was fine. Evelyn gets mail from the APS with a court date hearing set, and an affidavit from a social worker riff with misstatements and innuendos stating that Evelyn needed a guardian. She then gets a phone call from a lawyer saying she is her court appointed attorney acting upon Evelyn’s behalf, because this hearing is to set a guardian up over Evelyn, to make Evelyn a ward of the court. The court appointed Atty had written a letter to Evelyn stating the appt of the 8/25 did not go in Evelyn’s favor, Plus in this letter, the Atty suggested perhaps no need for a guardian if she, Evelyn’s lawyer could fulfill the conservator ship position. Evelyn decides to appoint a local POA and together, they would try to right some of these wrongs, instead. She didn’t trust this set-up, and rightfully so.
This lawyer failed to address Evelyn’s wishes to remain in her home, keep the currant situation that she was living her happy life in, and make APS go away!! Instead, seeming to suggest these alternatives were the only thing that was going to rule over Evelyn’s life, as a ward of the court. If she was appointed a guardian, she would be placed in a nursing home and the guardian would sell her home to pay those expenses, evicting Dean who had worked nearly 15 yrs to keep her healthy and happy. They could freeze the bank accounts and take all those funds, all of the treasures Evelyn placed in the home, and do with whatever they wanted, without her knowledge or consent, even selling her precious home. Making her a ward of the court, an incompetent, and they were on third base already, with much misinformation and cover-ups. First things first, we went back to the doctor, he wrote that indeed, Evelyn just simply needed to continue her present living arrangements and did not need a guardian. In getting a copy of the case files, the Very FIRST page, and of about 40 plus pages, it states: “APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN OF ALLEDGED INCOMPETANT”.. – and those terrible words are through-out the file. APS had the doctor’s report in there, about 3 times, but not once the hand written one that said she is mentally alert and doing good on her own. (Wonder why that is?) This is going to set in place a robbery and kidnapping of the worst kind – simply because she is an older woman – Adult Protective Services thinks they have the power to do this and become her boss. “What is this world coming to?” This isn’t Russia” Evelyn says.
The ‘hearing was done by a magistrate, (not a Judge) not a court of record as those offering testimony did not have to swear it to be true under perjury, and not giving Evelyn’s POA voice along with Evelyn. Jurisdiction was raised by Evelyn, but not duly noted nor at that proceeding, ruled upon. Instead, a more in depth geriatric, psychological evaluation was now court ordered, saying her doctor (although a glowing report) was an internist and they wanted a specialist evaluation. Where does this end? Government over-stepping their bounds, against ones consent, just because they have for so long, and think they can, period.
Because she does not, and will not EVER consent to this kind of treatment, Evelyn is going out of her way to defend herself, proving no one has jurisdiction over her life, liberty and property, but her. All she wants is peace in her home, yet if APS has their way, she won’t even have a home. The end effect of this attack and the outcome that could happen is to evict her caretaker out of a home he has worked for nearly 15 years – and the happy retirement Evelyn has always looked forward to, that is now up in the air. AND why?
Others have been in this same situation, (google youtube Adult Protection) like the Kidds couple in Texas most recently. Only due to the Grace of God Fox news reported that case, and stopped the sale of their home at the court house steps, while the investigation continues to try to set them back in their home, instead of raking up $7,000.00 a month needlessly for them to be parked in a nursing home. A 67 yr old woman, 70 yr old man, asking “What has America come to?”. What a true shame. If you have any horror stories, please write with details, no matter what part of the States you are in. Such outrage, such power over another’s life, turmoil when indeed it sure shouldn’t be.
to a-team@stratos.net
Attn: I do not consent# # #
PRO SE - what does it mean? Court, self defense in front of a judge
Some people say the Name: Sui Juris ; is a Latin phrase that literally means “of one’s own laws”. - Or use "PRO SE" Sovereign. The official definition
http://www.prlog.org/10360029-dont-consent-says-evelyn-when-faced-assault-by-cuyahoga-county-adult-protection-agency.html
Submitted by savcash on October 18, 2009 - 2:24am.
Evelyn is fighting for her liberty against Adult Protective Services (APS). She did not ask for this unwarranted intrusion into her life. In fact she refused them.
Her physician of 29-years confirms that Evelyn, despite her age, is competent and does not need a guardian or protective care. APS is determined, in the face of no supporting evidence of their claims, to move forward to take control over Evelyn’s person and estate. If APS is successful Evelyn will be taken out of the comfort and security of her home that costs her practically nothing to be placed forcefully in an adult care facility consisting of one small room that will cost between $3000 and $7,000 monthly and give the guardian a plausible excuse to ravage her life savings and sell her home to pay for. This is what Evelyn does not consent to.
For the past 15-years, Evelyn has had a live-in caregiver who she has been pleased with for nearly 15 years. Evelyn will be the first to tell you that she enjoys excellent care and Dean’s home cooking all these years which has contributed to her good health that is confirmed by her physician. Years ago, Evelyn put into place a Living Will with an Executrix and Power of Attorney to administer her remaining affairs upon her death. Several friends who care about her and for her surround Evelyn. Evidenced by this notice.
Problems with APS began almost one-year ago when Evelyn’s care-giver suffered a heart attack. Between a couple of Mayfield police officers, a social worker and a governmental system Evelyn found herself caught up “in the system” with a myriad of APS staffers intruding into her life and going so far as to have her made a ward of the court in a hearing fraught with lies, misstatements and innuendos. Evelyn has terminated this attorney who was not protecting Evelyn, but in fact, was swiftly ushering Evelyn through the system – on her way to being placed into an assisted-living facility under the care custody and control of the state and against her will.
A court case is still pending. Evelyn and friends hope that media will bring attention to Evelyn’s plight and the untruthful, over-stepping by Adult Protective Services. The Internet shows that similar situations are happening to the elderly homeowners across the United States. Evelyn Needs your help now. Shine a bright light on this one.
http://realneo.us/content/93-year-old-evelyn-schwartz-says-%E2%80%9Ci-do-not-consent%E2%80%9D-while-cuyahoga-county-adult-protective-s
. . . . . . . . .
“I don't consent!” Says Evelyn when faced w/ assault by Cuyahoga County Adult protection Agency
At 93 years old, this gracious private prideful Christian woman does not need to fight these battles, to read she's an alleged incompetent, & to stress her out if indeed, these appointments, court ordered, may possibly ruin her life as she knows it.
Sep 30, 2009 – Evelyn Schwartz was born in 1916, became widowed 39 years ago, having had no children. She was a secretary to the Dean of a local Mayfield Ohio college,
When she became somewhat arthritic, she started using a walker and was unable to drive, among other things. She made life easier by enlisting a trusted male friend, Dean to assist her. She chooses to call him her Nephew (for appearances sake), as he was a number of yrs younger than her. Her brother had passed away years ago, and this arrangement of Dean living in and being her caregiver has worked well for nearly 15 years. The one overriding concern Evelyn has is that she stays in her own home until her death. She elicited Deans promise to assist in that wish.
Forward to Nov 2008: Dean had a heart attack and was in the hospital undergoing a bypass. Dean’s girl friend, a health care person, was caring for Evelyn until he returned a few days later. Evelyn had a sour stomach and was throwing up flem and the caregiver had called the doctor who suggested she get Evelyn some Pedilite, which she left to go get it . In the mean time, a sister in law came over and was insisting Evelyn go to an old folks home where she could get full time care. Evelyn refused but the sister in law persisted. Evelyn asked Dean (when he called home to see how Evelyn was) to ask this sister-in-law to quit, which he did when Evelyn handed the phone over to her. Uhlir refused (hung up on him) and so Dean called the police from the hospital to have her removed. Dean also called another friend, Betty Brown, to go over to the house and help care for Evelyn, which she did.
Upon arriving at the house, Brown found the police there talking with Uhlir and Evelyn. We believe Uhlir had convinced the cops that Dean was swindling Evelyn. The police were engaged in asking Evelyn over and over again to go to the hospital. to which Evelyn refused each time. The cop called EMS & they were obviously going to take Evelyn out of her house w/out her consent -a dozen times saying NO. Betty tried to have Evelyn tell the police, thank you but no thank you and was wrongly arrested for her trouble. (Mayfield certified audio of this event)
Present day:
Evelyn is fighting for her life against Adult Protective Services (APS) and gang. She is being attacked from every which way. Evelyn didn’t welcome any intrusion into her life. Evelyn had a team of friends around her. She had appointed a Power of Atty to act for her upon her death or if/when she became unable to speak for herself, she had a will, a health directive paperwork, and all of that. Yet the APS wanted to investigate to be sure they said, she was being properly taken care of and no one was exploiting her or causing her harm. When she permitted the APS (against her better judgment, but to make them go away) to come into her home, go thru her bank accounts, paperwork, have nurse exam her, and check out her house and cleanliness, living condition, even checking into the cupboards and icebox for food, she thought that would be the end of it – because all checked out fine. Thereafter Evelyn said no to further interference from APS. It was too stressful and she didn’t consent to this invasive unwanted and unneeded involvement.
Evelyn goes to her trusted doctor of 29 years, and he writes up a notice that he had just completed a SEE min-exam upon Evelyn and she did fine,. She gives this glowing report to APS, they had found nothing else wrong at the house, with the banking and money concerns, so end of story, right?. …NOT!.. A few months went by and everyone thought all was fine. Evelyn gets mail from the APS with a court date hearing set, and an affidavit from a social worker riff with misstatements and innuendos stating that Evelyn needed a guardian. She then gets a phone call from a lawyer saying she is her court appointed attorney acting upon Evelyn’s behalf, because this hearing is to set a guardian up over Evelyn, to make Evelyn a ward of the court. The court appointed Atty had written a letter to Evelyn stating the appt of the 8/25 did not go in Evelyn’s favor, Plus in this letter, the Atty suggested perhaps no need for a guardian if she, Evelyn’s lawyer could fulfill the conservator ship position. Evelyn decides to appoint a local POA and together, they would try to right some of these wrongs, instead. She didn’t trust this set-up, and rightfully so.
This lawyer failed to address Evelyn’s wishes to remain in her home, keep the currant situation that she was living her happy life in, and make APS go away!! Instead, seeming to suggest these alternatives were the only thing that was going to rule over Evelyn’s life, as a ward of the court. If she was appointed a guardian, she would be placed in a nursing home and the guardian would sell her home to pay those expenses, evicting Dean who had worked nearly 15 yrs to keep her healthy and happy. They could freeze the bank accounts and take all those funds, all of the treasures Evelyn placed in the home, and do with whatever they wanted, without her knowledge or consent, even selling her precious home. Making her a ward of the court, an incompetent, and they were on third base already, with much misinformation and cover-ups. First things first, we went back to the doctor, he wrote that indeed, Evelyn just simply needed to continue her present living arrangements and did not need a guardian. In getting a copy of the case files, the Very FIRST page, and of about 40 plus pages, it states: “APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN OF ALLEDGED INCOMPETANT”.. – and those terrible words are through-out the file. APS had the doctor’s report in there, about 3 times, but not once the hand written one that said she is mentally alert and doing good on her own. (Wonder why that is?) This is going to set in place a robbery and kidnapping of the worst kind – simply because she is an older woman – Adult Protective Services thinks they have the power to do this and become her boss. “What is this world coming to?” This isn’t Russia” Evelyn says.
The ‘hearing was done by a magistrate, (not a Judge) not a court of record as those offering testimony did not have to swear it to be true under perjury, and not giving Evelyn’s POA voice along with Evelyn. Jurisdiction was raised by Evelyn, but not duly noted nor at that proceeding, ruled upon. Instead, a more in depth geriatric, psychological evaluation was now court ordered, saying her doctor (although a glowing report) was an internist and they wanted a specialist evaluation. Where does this end? Government over-stepping their bounds, against ones consent, just because they have for so long, and think they can, period.
Because she does not, and will not EVER consent to this kind of treatment, Evelyn is going out of her way to defend herself, proving no one has jurisdiction over her life, liberty and property, but her. All she wants is peace in her home, yet if APS has their way, she won’t even have a home. The end effect of this attack and the outcome that could happen is to evict her caretaker out of a home he has worked for nearly 15 years – and the happy retirement Evelyn has always looked forward to, that is now up in the air. AND why?
Others have been in this same situation, (google youtube Adult Protection) like the Kidds couple in Texas most recently. Only due to the Grace of God Fox news reported that case, and stopped the sale of their home at the court house steps, while the investigation continues to try to set them back in their home, instead of raking up $7,000.00 a month needlessly for them to be parked in a nursing home. A 67 yr old woman, 70 yr old man, asking “What has America come to?”. What a true shame. If you have any horror stories, please write with details, no matter what part of the States you are in. Such outrage, such power over another’s life, turmoil when indeed it sure shouldn’t be.
to a-team@stratos.net
Attn: I do not consent# # #
PRO SE - what does it mean? Court, self defense in front of a judge
Some people say the Name: Sui Juris ; is a Latin phrase that literally means “of one’s own laws”. - Or use "PRO SE" Sovereign. The official definition
http://www.prlog.org/10360029-dont-consent-says-evelyn-when-faced-assault-by-cuyahoga-county-adult-protection-agency.html
APS Probate court + a Guardian try 'ordering' Evelyn Schwart
http://www.youtube.com/user/ohwidow
[10/20/09] Once a person is a target of the Adult Protective Service (APS) the 'system' holds on for dear life, with or without the consent of the ones they are calling 'in need'. In fact, there are many cases on YOU-Tube of just this and guardianship abuse.
Evelyn had her own doctor evaluation, did great, and now they keep coming at her. He first wrote a hand written form, all was fine. Then when the wanna be guardian sent him an "expert Evaluation" form, it was ambiguous, and he then corrected it with another hand written letter stating all Evelyn "simply needed to do was keep her currant living arrangements, and she needed no guardian".
If anyone has any horror stories or ideas to make them back away, please post or leave your email - we are working at stopping this assault on a 93 yr old woman, Evelyn in Cleveland Ohio. There is no consent, yet the court sets an appointment for an UN-needed second evaluation (2 hrs long), what happened to peace in one's own home, having righteous courts need to prove jurisdiction and consent? She is innocent and they put her out to make her prove she is guilty?:( Of being incompetent as they think all older people are.)
Since going down this road to assist Evelyn we have found many nice sites and links, --copy--National Association to Stop Guardian Abuse. NASGA is a public benefit civil rights organization formed by victims and for victims of guardianship and conservator-ship abuse. Offers videos and a blog. http://www.stopguardianabuse.org/ is one. If you know of others, please let us know. They are taking donations and For the latest news about guardianship and conservator-ship, visit NASGA's blog @
http://nasga-stopguardianabuse.blogspot.com/
Evelyn isn't in the 'system' yet - but they think they are on third base, and have made her a ward, unreal, and had a guardianship hearing, and over our objections, now the magistrate orders the DEC 3rd appt. with a Judge. Look up these type of nightmares on you-tube that have happened. Maybe some need APS and Probate, and guardians, but the ones who don't - whew, the 'system' fights dirty, tooth and nail to make it happen.
"Isolate, medicate, steal the estate" is a phrase commonly associated with the perpetration of Involuntary Redistribution of Assets (IRA) and the courts don't keep up with it, and they have a hand in permitting it to happen sometimes too. To do this to a woman who has no need, not wishing their involvement and insistent on making them go away, we now find her story is much like many others.
Read the press release here
http://www.prlog.org/10360029-dont-consent-says-evelyn-when-faced-assault-by-cuyahoga-county-adult-protection-agency.html
and see one way to get involved here "Except for the Grace of God" reason enough to join the County Grand Jury
Introduction; help needed for an older woman, Evelyn, in helping her stand her ground in not consenting to involvement from Adult Protection Agency. A solution; a Grand Jury of 25 people to hear this.
http://realneo.us/content/except-grace-god-reason-enough-join-county-grand-jury
Starting to help here, might someday help you or your family in the future.
Also, visit http://www.wetheprosepeople.com/ to educate yourself more.
But for now, please let us know what experiences or ideas, or help you might offer.
See video two on caregiver options of Evelyns
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8hnvW5OUru4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4yl8BM1CWg
Friday, October 16, 2009
Fresno - Please Help Marla!
From: Marla (403660013)
Date: 10/16/2009 6:50:56 PM
Subject: More BULLSHIT!
Marla
With a hacked computer, my emails and online reports are CONSTANTLY intercepted. I am now receiving off-the-wall responses from Jim Costa's office, Sen. Feinstein's office, Sen. Boxer's office - they claim to be responding to my letters pertaining to everything under the sun, EXCEPT WHAT I REPORTED! Secret altering of the valley's water system as described on my page. Click: Marla
Never-ending monitoring, sabotaging, discrediting, stalking not to mention DEATH THREATS for exposing this operation. I cannot get beyond these people to get this information into the right hands / agency.
Please, I am asking for your help. I am PLEADING for your help. Forward the link www.myspace.com/marlkalk4 or http://marlalk.wordpress.com/2009/09/14/behind-mayor-autrys-so-called-infrastructure-upgrade/ to various city, state, federal agencies. Which ones? If I provide email addresses, I can 99% guarantee that the information will not get through. So please, if you decide to help with this, do NOT inform me who / where you forwarded the information. Just please, get the information through.
This pertains to CA's water supply, which affects all of us. Please help.
http://missmarla.wordpress.com/
Date: 10/16/2009 6:50:56 PM
Subject: More BULLSHIT!
With a hacked computer, my emails and online reports are CONSTANTLY intercepted. I am now receiving off-the-wall responses from Jim Costa's office, Sen. Feinstein's office, Sen. Boxer's office - they claim to be responding to my letters pertaining to everything under the sun, EXCEPT WHAT I REPORTED! Secret altering of the valley's water system as described on my page. Click: Marla
Never-ending monitoring, sabotaging, discrediting, stalking not to mention DEATH THREATS for exposing this operation. I cannot get beyond these people to get this information into the right hands / agency.
Please, I am asking for your help. I am PLEADING for your help. Forward the link www.myspace.com/marlkalk4 or
This pertains to CA's water supply, which affects all of us. Please help.
http://missmarla.wordpress.com/
Friday, September 25, 2009
G20 Police Using Intimidation Techniques, Military Weapons
From: Irish American Patriot
Date: 9/25/2009 9:38:27 AM
Subject: G20 Police Using Intimidation Techniques, Military Weapons
Police Using Intimidation Techniques, Military Weapons To Break Up Peaceful Protests
Scenes wouldn't look out of place in Communist China, Nazi Germany
Steve Watson
Infowars.net
Friday, Sept 25, 2009
Video footage is pouring onto Youtube that clearly shows riot police in Pittsburgh using intimidation tactics and military weapons to disperse peaceful assemblies in the vicinity of the G20 summit.
In the first video an officer appears on the scene where protesters are peacefully gathered and immediately tells them to leave the area, threatening everyone with arrest should they not comply.
The in a scene that looks as if it took place in Communist China, riot officers form a line parallel to the protesters, extending to both ends of the street, and slowly walk towards them, noisily and simultaneously marching and beating their shields with their batons.
This is a clear intimidation tactic to cause fear and psychologically.. effect the peaceful protesters in an effort to herd them and get them to disperse.
We Are Change and Infowars reporter Luke Rudkowski speaks into a bullhorn throughout, as this complete violation of the First Amendment unfolds. He notes how LRAD sound weapons used in Afghanistan and Iraq are now being used against peaceful American citizens on the streets of Pittsburgh by armed military troops.
Chants of "USA, USA" ring out and protesters holding cameras and signs break into applause at Luke's words as the jackboot police continue to advance. It is hard to believe that this is America.
The LRAD Weapons are then brought to the scene and an announcement blasts out towards the protesters:
"BY ORDER OF THE CITY OF PITTBURGH CHIEF OF POLICE WE HEREBY DECLARE THIS TO BE AN UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY."
IT DOES NOT MATTER WHAT YOUR PURPOSE IS, YOU MUST LEAVE. IF YOU DO NOT DISPERSE, YOU MAY BE ARRESTED AND/OR SUBJECT TO OTHER POLICE ACTION. OTHER POLICE ACTION MAY INCLUDE ACTUAL PHYSICAL REMOVAL, THE USE OF RIOT CONTROL AGENTS AND/OR LESS LETHAL MUNITIONS WHICH COULD CAUSE RISK OF INJURY TO THOSE WHO REMAIN."
Watch the video:
http://infowars.net/articles/september2009/250909Intimidation.htm
Date: 9/25/2009 9:38:27 AM
Subject: G20 Police Using Intimidation Techniques, Military Weapons
Police Using Intimidation Techniques, Military Weapons To Break Up Peaceful Protests
Scenes wouldn't look out of place in Communist China, Nazi Germany
Steve Watson
Infowars.net
Friday, Sept 25, 2009
Video footage is pouring onto Youtube that clearly shows riot police in Pittsburgh using intimidation tactics and military weapons to disperse peaceful assemblies in the vicinity of the G20 summit.
In the first video an officer appears on the scene where protesters are peacefully gathered and immediately tells them to leave the area, threatening everyone with arrest should they not comply.
The in a scene that looks as if it took place in Communist China, riot officers form a line parallel to the protesters, extending to both ends of the street, and slowly walk towards them, noisily and simultaneously marching and beating their shields with their batons.
This is a clear intimidation tactic to cause fear and psychologically.. effect the peaceful protesters in an effort to herd them and get them to disperse.
We Are Change and Infowars reporter Luke Rudkowski speaks into a bullhorn throughout, as this complete violation of the First Amendment unfolds. He notes how LRAD sound weapons used in Afghanistan and Iraq are now being used against peaceful American citizens on the streets of Pittsburgh by armed military troops.
Chants of "USA, USA" ring out and protesters holding cameras and signs break into applause at Luke's words as the jackboot police continue to advance. It is hard to believe that this is America.
The LRAD Weapons are then brought to the scene and an announcement blasts out towards the protesters:
"BY ORDER OF THE CITY OF PITTBURGH CHIEF OF POLICE WE HEREBY DECLARE THIS TO BE AN UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY."
IT DOES NOT MATTER WHAT YOUR PURPOSE IS, YOU MUST LEAVE. IF YOU DO NOT DISPERSE, YOU MAY BE ARRESTED AND/OR SUBJECT TO OTHER POLICE ACTION. OTHER POLICE ACTION MAY INCLUDE ACTUAL PHYSICAL REMOVAL, THE USE OF RIOT CONTROL AGENTS AND/OR LESS LETHAL MUNITIONS WHICH COULD CAUSE RISK OF INJURY TO THOSE WHO REMAIN."
Watch the video:
http://infowars.net/articles/september2009/250909Intimidation.htm
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
NARLO's SPECIALIZED, LEGALLY INTIMIDATING
We have known from specific incidents involving government code enforcement officers and private property owners, that a strongly-worded, NO TRESPASSING sign will, in most cases, keep code enforcement officers off of your property so that they can't look around and find alleged code infractions to charge you with and then extort money from you by levying huge penalties and fines for trumped up charges. To stop these government types in their tracts, we have researched and have printed a VERY LARGE, highly-visible, copyrighted, legally powerful NO TRESPASSING sign to thwart these folks from coming on your land. The signs are showing up on properties throughout the Western U. S.
Get your NO TRESPASSING signs up ASAP, before you fall victim to government's covert code enforcement. Your property may be your largest asset. These NO TRESPASSING signs are a small price to pay to properly protect it.
Signs should be posted in strategic areas, such as entrances to the property and where roads or trails touch the property. They are printed on 18" x 24" .03 inch (approx. 22 gauge) aluminum with mounting holes centered at top and bottom. Printed in black ink on a white background. (Minimum quantity = 3)
We strongly suggest that when you install your No Trespassing signs, you send a NO TRESPASSING SIGN POSTING NOTICE letter, or similar letter as modified by you, Certified - Return Receipt Requested, to: The county sheriff, each county commissioner, the director of the planning department, if any, the Governor and Attorney General of the State, or other government officials of your choosing.
RESIST! RESIST! RESIST! If government agents do show up, assume they are up to no good. Take pictures of them, record their voices, use a video camera or other device and get them on the record. Don't be shy. Have at-the-ready a Public Servant Questionnaire to log the information of their visit. Be sure to give them a blank copy of your Questionnaire. You fill it out, sign it and send a copy to the agent's office address. A copy of the NO TRESPASSING SIGN POSTING NOTICE letter and the PUBLIC SERVANT QUESTIONNAIRE will be shipped with your No Trespassing sign.
The hard, cold truth is, if you don't protect your property and your rights, make no mistake, government will, with malice, walk all over you because they feel empowered to do so. Why do they feel empowered? Because not enough Americans have challenged them and resisted their unlawful actions, much less their authority.
http://www.narlo.org/sign.html
Get your NO TRESPASSING signs up ASAP, before you fall victim to government's covert code enforcement. Your property may be your largest asset. These NO TRESPASSING signs are a small price to pay to properly protect it.
Signs should be posted in strategic areas, such as entrances to the property and where roads or trails touch the property. They are printed on 18" x 24" .03 inch (approx. 22 gauge) aluminum with mounting holes centered at top and bottom. Printed in black ink on a white background. (Minimum quantity = 3)
We strongly suggest that when you install your No Trespassing signs, you send a NO TRESPASSING SIGN POSTING NOTICE letter, or similar letter as modified by you, Certified - Return Receipt Requested, to: The county sheriff, each county commissioner, the director of the planning department, if any, the Governor and Attorney General of the State, or other government officials of your choosing.
RESIST! RESIST! RESIST! If government agents do show up, assume they are up to no good. Take pictures of them, record their voices, use a video camera or other device and get them on the record. Don't be shy. Have at-the-ready a Public Servant Questionnaire to log the information of their visit. Be sure to give them a blank copy of your Questionnaire. You fill it out, sign it and send a copy to the agent's office address. A copy of the NO TRESPASSING SIGN POSTING NOTICE letter and the PUBLIC SERVANT QUESTIONNAIRE will be shipped with your No Trespassing sign.
The hard, cold truth is, if you don't protect your property and your rights, make no mistake, government will, with malice, walk all over you because they feel empowered to do so. Why do they feel empowered? Because not enough Americans have challenged them and resisted their unlawful actions, much less their authority.
http://www.narlo.org/sign.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)